Andrea C Armbrecht, Bojan Kovacevic, Maria Dyrehave Rasmussen, Michelle Katharina Bernth, Ann Merete Moeller, Peter Vilmann
{"title":"雷马唑仑联合芬太尼与咪达唑仑联合芬太尼在结肠镜筛查中的镇静效果:随机对照研究。","authors":"Andrea C Armbrecht, Bojan Kovacevic, Maria Dyrehave Rasmussen, Michelle Katharina Bernth, Ann Merete Moeller, Peter Vilmann","doi":"10.1055/a-2655-1083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a favorable safety-profile when used for sedation in endoscopy. The aim of this project was to investigate efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl compared with midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy among fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening participants.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to intravenous remimazolam + fentanyl (RF) or midazolam + fentanyl (MF). Primary outcome was total time from start of medication until discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to reach cecum, need for post-procedure recovery, patient-reported pain and satisfaction, need for additional medication, and procedure completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients were included and randomized 1:1 (RF:103, MF:102). Mean age was 62.6 years, whereas female/male ratio was 97/108. Mean time from start of medication until discharge was 29.9 minutes (RF) versus 35.0 minutes (MF) (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.94, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Mean time to reach the cecum was 15.4 minutes (RF) compared with 20.2 minutes (MF) ( <i>P</i> = 0.001). Proportion of patients requiring postoperative observation was lower for RF 0.97% vs 9.8% for MF ( <i>P</i> = 0.022). Patients receiving remimazolam reported an average lower pain score (mean 2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) <i>P</i> = 0.012) and higher overall satisfaction score (4.65 vs 4.33, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows clear superiority of the combination of remimazolam with fentanyl over midazolam with fentanyl for conscious sedation in screening colonoscopy, obtaining shorter procedure time, less postoperative need for observation, lower patient pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26551083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl vs midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in screening colonoscopy: Randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea C Armbrecht, Bojan Kovacevic, Maria Dyrehave Rasmussen, Michelle Katharina Bernth, Ann Merete Moeller, Peter Vilmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2655-1083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a favorable safety-profile when used for sedation in endoscopy. The aim of this project was to investigate efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl compared with midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy among fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening participants.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to intravenous remimazolam + fentanyl (RF) or midazolam + fentanyl (MF). Primary outcome was total time from start of medication until discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to reach cecum, need for post-procedure recovery, patient-reported pain and satisfaction, need for additional medication, and procedure completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 patients were included and randomized 1:1 (RF:103, MF:102). Mean age was 62.6 years, whereas female/male ratio was 97/108. Mean time from start of medication until discharge was 29.9 minutes (RF) versus 35.0 minutes (MF) (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.94, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Mean time to reach the cecum was 15.4 minutes (RF) compared with 20.2 minutes (MF) ( <i>P</i> = 0.001). Proportion of patients requiring postoperative observation was lower for RF 0.97% vs 9.8% for MF ( <i>P</i> = 0.022). Patients receiving remimazolam reported an average lower pain score (mean 2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) <i>P</i> = 0.012) and higher overall satisfaction score (4.65 vs 4.33, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows clear superiority of the combination of remimazolam with fentanyl over midazolam with fentanyl for conscious sedation in screening colonoscopy, obtaining shorter procedure time, less postoperative need for observation, lower patient pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a26551083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371649/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-1083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2655-1083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与研究目的:雷马唑仑是一种新型超短效苯二氮卓类药物,在内镜下镇静时具有良好的安全性。本项目的目的是在粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)阳性筛查参与者中,比较雷马唑仑与芬太尼联合使用咪达唑仑与芬太尼在结肠镜检查中的镇静效果。患者和方法:本研究为前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。接受结肠镜检查的fit阳性参与者随机分为静脉注射雷马唑仑+芬太尼(RF)或咪达唑仑+芬太尼(MF)组。主要结局是从开始用药到出院的总时间。次要结局包括到达盲肠的时间、术后恢复的需要、患者报告的疼痛和满意度、需要额外的药物治疗和手术完成情况。结果:共纳入205例患者,按1:1随机分组(RF:103, MF:102)。平均年龄62.6岁,男女比例为97/108。从开始用药到出院的平均时间为29.9分钟(RF),而35.0分钟(MF)(95%置信区间0.77 ~ 0.94,P = 0.012)。到达盲肠的平均时间为15.4分钟(RF),而20.2分钟(MF) (P = 0.001)。RF组术后需要观察的患者比例为0.97%,MF组为9.8% (P = 0.022)。接受雷马唑仑治疗的患者报告的平均疼痛评分较低(平均2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) P = 0.012),总体满意度评分较高(4.65 vs 4.33, P = 0.012)。结论:本研究显示雷马唑仑联合芬太尼在结肠镜筛查中明显优于咪达唑仑联合芬太尼进行意识镇静,手术时间更短,术后观察需要更少,患者疼痛评分更低,患者满意度更高。
Efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl vs midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in screening colonoscopy: Randomized controlled study.
Background and study aims: Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a favorable safety-profile when used for sedation in endoscopy. The aim of this project was to investigate efficacy of remimazolam with fentanyl compared with midazolam with fentanyl for sedation in colonoscopy among fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive screening participants.
Patients and methods: The study was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to intravenous remimazolam + fentanyl (RF) or midazolam + fentanyl (MF). Primary outcome was total time from start of medication until discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to reach cecum, need for post-procedure recovery, patient-reported pain and satisfaction, need for additional medication, and procedure completion.
Results: A total of 205 patients were included and randomized 1:1 (RF:103, MF:102). Mean age was 62.6 years, whereas female/male ratio was 97/108. Mean time from start of medication until discharge was 29.9 minutes (RF) versus 35.0 minutes (MF) (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.94, P = 0.012). Mean time to reach the cecum was 15.4 minutes (RF) compared with 20.2 minutes (MF) ( P = 0.001). Proportion of patients requiring postoperative observation was lower for RF 0.97% vs 9.8% for MF ( P = 0.022). Patients receiving remimazolam reported an average lower pain score (mean 2.25 (RF) vs 3.25 (MF) P = 0.012) and higher overall satisfaction score (4.65 vs 4.33, P = 0.012).
Conclusions: This study shows clear superiority of the combination of remimazolam with fentanyl over midazolam with fentanyl for conscious sedation in screening colonoscopy, obtaining shorter procedure time, less postoperative need for observation, lower patient pain scores, and higher patient satisfaction.