直接可视化内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的比较。

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-08-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2638-6177
Jun-Yu Pan, Hui-Xin Zhi, Jie-Li Chen, Hao-Xin Chen, De-Feng Li, Jun Yao, Li-Sheng Wang
{"title":"直接可视化内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的比较。","authors":"Jun-Yu Pan, Hui-Xin Zhi, Jie-Li Chen, Hao-Xin Chen, De-Feng Li, Jun Yao, Li-Sheng Wang","doi":"10.1055/a-2638-6177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), an advanced technique building upon conventional ERAT, represents a novel endoscopic approach for managing acute uncomplicated appendicitis. This study aimed to assess clinical efficacy and safety of employing cholangioscope-guided endoscopic intervention as a therapeutic approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 656 patients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis between February 2024 and November 2024. To minimize baseline differences, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in a final study population of 34 patients undergoing direct visualization ERAT and 68 patients treated with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Key outcome measures included technical and clinical success rates, operative time, time to postoperative pain resolution, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and overall patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 97.06% (33/34) in the ERAT group and 100% in the LA group ( <i>P</i> = 0.333), while clinical success was achieved in 94.12% (32/34) of ERAT cases compared with 100% in the LA cohort ( <i>P</i> = 0.109). Notably, ERAT was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (37 vs 50 minutes; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and more rapid postoperative pain relief ( <i>P</i> = 0.001), with a greater proportion of patients reporting complete symptom resolution within 2 days of the procedure. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of AEs, length of hospital stay, or patient satisfaction. During follow-up, a recurrence of appendicitis was observed in one ERAT patient (2.94%, 1/34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Direct visualization ERAT demonstrated high feasibility and effectiveness as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, offering a promising alternative to conventional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a26386177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis.\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Yu Pan, Hui-Xin Zhi, Jie-Li Chen, Hao-Xin Chen, De-Feng Li, Jun Yao, Li-Sheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2638-6177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), an advanced technique building upon conventional ERAT, represents a novel endoscopic approach for managing acute uncomplicated appendicitis. This study aimed to assess clinical efficacy and safety of employing cholangioscope-guided endoscopic intervention as a therapeutic approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 656 patients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis between February 2024 and November 2024. To minimize baseline differences, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in a final study population of 34 patients undergoing direct visualization ERAT and 68 patients treated with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Key outcome measures included technical and clinical success rates, operative time, time to postoperative pain resolution, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and overall patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 97.06% (33/34) in the ERAT group and 100% in the LA group ( <i>P</i> = 0.333), while clinical success was achieved in 94.12% (32/34) of ERAT cases compared with 100% in the LA cohort ( <i>P</i> = 0.109). Notably, ERAT was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (37 vs 50 minutes; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and more rapid postoperative pain relief ( <i>P</i> = 0.001), with a greater proportion of patients reporting complete symptom resolution within 2 days of the procedure. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of AEs, length of hospital stay, or patient satisfaction. During follow-up, a recurrence of appendicitis was observed in one ERAT patient (2.94%, 1/34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Direct visualization ERAT demonstrated high feasibility and effectiveness as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, offering a promising alternative to conventional approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a26386177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2638-6177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2638-6177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与研究目的:内镜逆行性阑尾炎直接可视化治疗(ERAT)是在传统内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗基础上发展起来的一种先进技术,是治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎的一种新的内镜方法。本研究旨在评估胆道镜引导下的内镜干预作为治疗方法的临床疗效和安全性。患者与方法:回顾性分析2024年2月至11月656例疑似急性阑尾炎患者的临床资料。为了尽量减少基线差异,采用倾向评分匹配,最终研究人群为34例接受直接可视化ERAT的患者和68例接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的患者。主要结局指标包括技术和临床成功率、手术时间、术后疼痛缓解时间、住院时间、复发率、不良事件发生率(ae)和患者总体满意度。结果:ERAT组的技术成功率为97.06% (33/34),LA组为100% (P = 0.333); ERAT组的临床成功率为94.12% (32/34),LA组为100% (P = 0.109)。值得注意的是,ERAT与更短的手术时间(37 vs 50分钟;P < 0.001)和更快的术后疼痛缓解(P = 0.001)相关,更大比例的患者报告在手术后2天内症状完全缓解。两组在ae、住院时间或患者满意度方面无显著差异。随访期间,1例ERAT患者阑尾炎复发(2.94%,1/34)。结论:直接可视化ERAT作为急性无并发症阑尾炎的诊断和治疗方式具有很高的可行性和有效性,是传统方法的一种有希望的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

Background and study aims: Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), an advanced technique building upon conventional ERAT, represents a novel endoscopic approach for managing acute uncomplicated appendicitis. This study aimed to assess clinical efficacy and safety of employing cholangioscope-guided endoscopic intervention as a therapeutic approach.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 656 patients presenting with suspected acute appendicitis between February 2024 and November 2024. To minimize baseline differences, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in a final study population of 34 patients undergoing direct visualization ERAT and 68 patients treated with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Key outcome measures included technical and clinical success rates, operative time, time to postoperative pain resolution, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and overall patient satisfaction.

Results: The technical success rate was 97.06% (33/34) in the ERAT group and 100% in the LA group ( P = 0.333), while clinical success was achieved in 94.12% (32/34) of ERAT cases compared with 100% in the LA cohort ( P = 0.109). Notably, ERAT was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (37 vs 50 minutes; P < 0.001) and more rapid postoperative pain relief ( P = 0.001), with a greater proportion of patients reporting complete symptom resolution within 2 days of the procedure. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of AEs, length of hospital stay, or patient satisfaction. During follow-up, a recurrence of appendicitis was observed in one ERAT patient (2.94%, 1/34).

Conclusions: Direct visualization ERAT demonstrated high feasibility and effectiveness as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, offering a promising alternative to conventional approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信