Omaika Victoria Criollo-Barrios, Carlos Roberto Luna-Domínguez, Carlos Alberto Luna-Lara, Ricardo de Jesus Figueroa-López, Ronaldo Câmara Cozza, Jorge Humberto Luna-Domínguez
{"title":"3d打印光敏树脂粘合正畸附着物:体外研究。","authors":"Omaika Victoria Criollo-Barrios, Carlos Roberto Luna-Domínguez, Carlos Alberto Luna-Lara, Ricardo de Jesus Figueroa-López, Ronaldo Câmara Cozza, Jorge Humberto Luna-Domínguez","doi":"10.3390/dj13080341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec<sup>®</sup>, SAREMCO Dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (<i>Ra</i>) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). <b>Results</b>: The AA group showed the highest <i>Ra</i> (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Omaika Victoria Criollo-Barrios, Carlos Roberto Luna-Domínguez, Carlos Alberto Luna-Lara, Ricardo de Jesus Figueroa-López, Ronaldo Câmara Cozza, Jorge Humberto Luna-Domínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec<sup>®</sup>, SAREMCO Dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (<i>Ra</i>) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). <b>Results</b>: The AA group showed the highest <i>Ra</i> (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:越来越多的临床集成的3d打印确定树脂需要全面了解其物理化学性质和粘合行为。然而,关于这些材料上的明确对准器复合附件的最佳表面处理和粘合策略的证据有限。本研究旨在表征3d打印的最终树脂,评估表面处理对其表面形貌的影响,并比较使用不同粘合剂系统在热循环前后粘合附着物的剪切粘合强度(SBS)。方法:采用3D打印牙科树脂(Crowntec®,SAREMCO dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico)制作120个矩形标本。为了进行物理化学表征,6个样品进行了扫描电子显微镜/能量色散光谱,x射线衍射和热重分析。为了评估表面形貌,42个抛光标本被分为三组:未经处理(对照),用4%氢氟酸(HFA)蚀刻,或用50µm Al2O3 (AA)喷砂。每组进行扫描电镜观察和表面粗糙度(Ra)测量。对于SBS测试,另外72个样品接受相同的表面处理,并根据粘合剂系统进一步细分:Transbond™XT Primer (TXT)或Single Bond Universal (SBU)。结果:AA组Ra最高(2.21±0.30µm), HFA组Ra最低(0.81±0.20µm),对照组Ra最低(0.07±0.30µm) (p < 0.001)。AA + SBU组的SBS最高,AA + TXT组次之。结论:用Al2O3颗粒喷砂,结合通用粘合剂,可以显著提高粘合强度,这表明3D打印最终复合材料在对准器附着应用中的可行方案。
Bonding Orthodontic Attachments to 3D-Printed Photosensitive Definitive Resin: An In Vitro Study.
Background/Objectives: The increasing clinical integration of 3D-printed definitive resins requires a comprehensive understanding of their physicochemical properties and adhesive behavior. However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal surface treatment and bonding strategies for clear aligner composite attachments on these materials. This study aimed to characterize a 3D-printed definitive resin, evaluate the effects of surface treatments on its surface topography, and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of the bonded attachments using different adhesive systems, both before and after thermocycling. Methods: A total of 120 rectangular specimens were fabricated from a 3D printed dental resin (Crowntec®, SAREMCO Dental AG-Mexico City, Mexico). For physicochemical characterization, six samples underwent scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analysis. To evaluate surface topography, 42 polished specimens were assigned to three groups: untreated (control), etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid (HFA), or sandblasted with 50 µm Al2O3 (AA). Each group was subdivided for SEM observation and surface roughness (Ra) measurement. For SBS testing, 72 additional samples received the same surface treatments and were further subdivided according to the adhesive system: Transbond™ XT Primer (TXT) or Single Bond Universal (SBU). Results: The AA group showed the highest Ra (2.21 ± 0.30 µm), followed by HFA (0.81 ± 0.20 µm) and control (0.07 ± 0.30 µm) (p < 0.001). The highest SBS was observed in the AA + SBU group, followed by AA + TXT. Conclusions: Sandblasting with Al2O3 particles, combined with a universal adhesive, significantly improved bond strength, suggesting a viable protocol for 3D printed definitive composites in aligner attachment applications.