草药和硝酸钾牙膏治疗牙本质过敏的比较:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
La-Ongthong Vajrabhaya, Supranee Benjasupattananan, Kraisorn Sappayatosok, Papatpong Sirikururat, Suwanna Korsuwannawong, Vittawin Dechosilpa
{"title":"草药和硝酸钾牙膏治疗牙本质过敏的比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"La-Ongthong Vajrabhaya, Supranee Benjasupattananan, Kraisorn Sappayatosok, Papatpong Sirikururat, Suwanna Korsuwannawong, Vittawin Dechosilpa","doi":"10.3390/dj13080369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed in alleviating tooth sensitivity compared to a conventional potassium nitrate toothpaste. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 90 healthy patients aged 18-70 with up to two teeth exhibiting gingival recession were recruited into this study. All selected teeth had a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 4 in response to tactile or air blast stimuli. Excluded teeth included those requiring restoration or participants undergoing treatments affecting sensitivity or taking pain medication/anti-sensitivity agents. Participants were randomly divided into three groups and instructed to brush twice daily with different toothpastes. The S1 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract, the S2 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract with 0.7% potassium nitrate, and the S3 group was prescribed toothpaste containing potassium nitrate. VAS scores were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Data were then compared and statistically analyzed between the groups. <b>Results</b>: For the tactile test, the final number of included teeth was 47 in the S1 group, 46 in the S2 group, and 22 in the S3 group. For the air blast test, the number of teeth included was 38 in the S1 group, 30 in the S2 group, and 27 in the S3 group. At baseline, mean VAS scores were comparable across groups for both tactile (S1: 6.89 ± 0.98; S2: 6.65 ± 1.52; S3: 6.82 ± 1.99) and air blast tests (S1: 7.39 ± 1.15; S2: 7.53 ± 1.31; S3: 6.89 ± 2.12). All groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores from baseline at both 2 and 4 weeks. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant between-group differences in VAS scores at 2 and 4 weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Post hoc analysis (Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction) at 2 weeks revealed that the S1 group had significantly higher VAS scores than those of S2 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.001, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.001) and S3 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.002, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.018). By 4 weeks, the S2 group demonstrated superior efficacy, with significantly lower VAS scores compared to those of S1 (tactile <i>p</i> < 0.001, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.030) and S3 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.035, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: All tested toothpastes effectively reduced dentin hypersensitivity over the study period. Potassium nitrate toothpaste provided more rapid initial relief, when compared to the herbal formulation alone; however, both achieved similar outcomes by 4 weeks. The herbal toothpaste supplemented with potassium nitrate demonstrated superior efficacy and may offer a promising natural alternative for managing dentin hypersensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Herbal and Potassium Nitrate Toothpastes in Managing Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"La-Ongthong Vajrabhaya, Supranee Benjasupattananan, Kraisorn Sappayatosok, Papatpong Sirikururat, Suwanna Korsuwannawong, Vittawin Dechosilpa\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed in alleviating tooth sensitivity compared to a conventional potassium nitrate toothpaste. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 90 healthy patients aged 18-70 with up to two teeth exhibiting gingival recession were recruited into this study. All selected teeth had a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 4 in response to tactile or air blast stimuli. Excluded teeth included those requiring restoration or participants undergoing treatments affecting sensitivity or taking pain medication/anti-sensitivity agents. Participants were randomly divided into three groups and instructed to brush twice daily with different toothpastes. The S1 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract, the S2 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract with 0.7% potassium nitrate, and the S3 group was prescribed toothpaste containing potassium nitrate. VAS scores were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Data were then compared and statistically analyzed between the groups. <b>Results</b>: For the tactile test, the final number of included teeth was 47 in the S1 group, 46 in the S2 group, and 22 in the S3 group. For the air blast test, the number of teeth included was 38 in the S1 group, 30 in the S2 group, and 27 in the S3 group. At baseline, mean VAS scores were comparable across groups for both tactile (S1: 6.89 ± 0.98; S2: 6.65 ± 1.52; S3: 6.82 ± 1.99) and air blast tests (S1: 7.39 ± 1.15; S2: 7.53 ± 1.31; S3: 6.89 ± 2.12). All groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores from baseline at both 2 and 4 weeks. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant between-group differences in VAS scores at 2 and 4 weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Post hoc analysis (Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction) at 2 weeks revealed that the S1 group had significantly higher VAS scores than those of S2 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.001, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.001) and S3 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.002, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.018). By 4 weeks, the S2 group demonstrated superior efficacy, with significantly lower VAS scores compared to those of S1 (tactile <i>p</i> < 0.001, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.030) and S3 (tactile <i>p</i> = 0.035, air blast <i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: All tested toothpastes effectively reduced dentin hypersensitivity over the study period. Potassium nitrate toothpaste provided more rapid initial relief, when compared to the herbal formulation alone; however, both achieved similar outcomes by 4 weeks. The herbal toothpaste supplemented with potassium nitrate demonstrated superior efficacy and may offer a promising natural alternative for managing dentin hypersensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究比较了含有爪哇茶和小铁草的牙膏与传统硝酸钾牙膏在缓解牙齿敏感方面的效果。方法:选取年龄在18-70岁之间且伴有2颗以上牙龈萎缩的健康患者90例。所有选择的牙齿对触觉或空气冲击刺激的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均≥4分。排除的牙齿包括需要修复的牙齿或正在接受影响敏感性治疗或服用止痛药/抗敏感性药物的参与者。参与者被随机分成三组,并被要求每天用不同的牙膏刷两次牙。S1组处方含爪哇茶和小铁提取物的牙膏,S2组处方含爪哇茶和小铁提取物加0.7%硝酸钾的牙膏,S3组处方含硝酸钾的牙膏。分别在基线、2周和4周时记录VAS评分。然后对两组之间的数据进行比较和统计分析。结果:触觉测试中,S1组最终包含牙齿47颗,S2组46颗,S3组22颗。空气爆破试验中,S1组38颗牙齿,S2组30颗牙齿,S3组27颗牙齿。在基线时,两组间触觉测试(S1: 6.89±0.98;S2: 6.65±1.52;S3: 6.82±1.99)和空气爆炸测试(S1: 7.39±1.15;S2: 7.53±1.31;S3: 6.89±2.12)的平均VAS评分具有可比性。在第2周和第4周,所有组的VAS评分均较基线显著降低。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示2周和4周VAS评分组间差异显著(p = 0.001)。事后分析(Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction)显示,2周后,S1组的VAS评分显著高于S2组(触觉p = 0.001,空气冲击p = 0.001)和S3组(触觉p = 0.002,空气冲击p = 0.018)。4周时,S2组疗效显著,VAS评分明显低于S1组(触觉p < 0.001,空气冲击波p = 0.030)和S3组(触觉p = 0.035,空气冲击波p = 0.001)。结论:在研究期间,所有测试的牙膏都有效地减少了牙本质过敏。与单独使用草药制剂相比,硝酸钾牙膏提供了更快速的初始缓解;然而,两组在4周后都取得了相似的结果。草药牙膏补充硝酸钾证明了优越的功效,并可能提供一个有前途的自然替代管理牙本质过敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Herbal and Potassium Nitrate Toothpastes in Managing Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of Herbal and Potassium Nitrate Toothpastes in Managing Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the effectiveness of a toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed in alleviating tooth sensitivity compared to a conventional potassium nitrate toothpaste. Methods: A total of 90 healthy patients aged 18-70 with up to two teeth exhibiting gingival recession were recruited into this study. All selected teeth had a visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 4 in response to tactile or air blast stimuli. Excluded teeth included those requiring restoration or participants undergoing treatments affecting sensitivity or taking pain medication/anti-sensitivity agents. Participants were randomly divided into three groups and instructed to brush twice daily with different toothpastes. The S1 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract, the S2 group was prescribed toothpaste containing Java Tea and Little Ironweed extract with 0.7% potassium nitrate, and the S3 group was prescribed toothpaste containing potassium nitrate. VAS scores were recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Data were then compared and statistically analyzed between the groups. Results: For the tactile test, the final number of included teeth was 47 in the S1 group, 46 in the S2 group, and 22 in the S3 group. For the air blast test, the number of teeth included was 38 in the S1 group, 30 in the S2 group, and 27 in the S3 group. At baseline, mean VAS scores were comparable across groups for both tactile (S1: 6.89 ± 0.98; S2: 6.65 ± 1.52; S3: 6.82 ± 1.99) and air blast tests (S1: 7.39 ± 1.15; S2: 7.53 ± 1.31; S3: 6.89 ± 2.12). All groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores from baseline at both 2 and 4 weeks. A Kruskal-Wallis test indicated significant between-group differences in VAS scores at 2 and 4 weeks (p = 0.001). Post hoc analysis (Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction) at 2 weeks revealed that the S1 group had significantly higher VAS scores than those of S2 (tactile p = 0.001, air blast p = 0.001) and S3 (tactile p = 0.002, air blast p = 0.018). By 4 weeks, the S2 group demonstrated superior efficacy, with significantly lower VAS scores compared to those of S1 (tactile p < 0.001, air blast p = 0.030) and S3 (tactile p = 0.035, air blast p = 0.001). Conclusions: All tested toothpastes effectively reduced dentin hypersensitivity over the study period. Potassium nitrate toothpaste provided more rapid initial relief, when compared to the herbal formulation alone; however, both achieved similar outcomes by 4 weeks. The herbal toothpaste supplemented with potassium nitrate demonstrated superior efficacy and may offer a promising natural alternative for managing dentin hypersensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信