美丽新世界:分子测序治疗直肠癌的早期临床经验分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jared T Yee, Ahmed A Eltahir, Oluseye K Oduyale, Austin R Dosch, Nathan Kau, Catherine N Zivanov, Michelle Cowan, Kerri A Ohman, Paul E Wise, Steven R Hunt, Matthew G Mutch, Matthew L Silviera, William C Chapman
{"title":"美丽新世界:分子测序治疗直肠癌的早期临床经验分析。","authors":"Jared T Yee, Ahmed A Eltahir, Oluseye K Oduyale, Austin R Dosch, Nathan Kau, Catherine N Zivanov, Michelle Cowan, Kerri A Ohman, Paul E Wise, Steven R Hunt, Matthew G Mutch, Matthew L Silviera, William C Chapman","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in genetic sequencing technologies, including somatic next-generation sequencing and circulating tumor DNA assays, have significantly impacted rectal cancer management. However, the clinical implications of these technologies remain incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patterns and clinical utility of genetic sequencing among patients with rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis from a prospectively maintained institutional registry.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 251 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between January 2017 and April 2024, who underwent genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Somatic tumor sequencing and circulating tumor DNA analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Response to total neoadjuvant therapy, local recurrence, and distant metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic testing utilization increased substantially from 2017 to 2024, with somatic next generation sequencing testing rising from 3% to 33% and circulating tumor DNA from 2% to over 45%. Tumor mutational burden did not correlate significantly with response to total neoadjuvant therapy, recurrence, or metastasis. Mutation profiles across carcinogenesis pathways showed no significant differences between complete responders and those with residual disease after adjustment (p = 0.145). After total neoadjuvant therapy, circulating tumor DNA positivity strongly correlated with residual disease (sensitivity: 76.5%, specificity: 82.4%; p = 0.0016), with tumor-agnostic circulating tumor DNA assays demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than tumor-informed tests (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, potential selection bias, single-center data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing adoption, somatic next generation sequencing alone lacks clear prognostic or predictive utility for rectal cancer management. In contrast, circulating tumor DNA testing demonstrated substantial promise for assessing response to total neoadjuvant therapy, particularly using tumor-agnostic platforms. Further prospective studies are needed to refine clinical guidelines and fully integrate these genetic technologies into rectal cancer care. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brave New World: Analysis of Early Clinical Experience with Molecular Sequencing in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jared T Yee, Ahmed A Eltahir, Oluseye K Oduyale, Austin R Dosch, Nathan Kau, Catherine N Zivanov, Michelle Cowan, Kerri A Ohman, Paul E Wise, Steven R Hunt, Matthew G Mutch, Matthew L Silviera, William C Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in genetic sequencing technologies, including somatic next-generation sequencing and circulating tumor DNA assays, have significantly impacted rectal cancer management. However, the clinical implications of these technologies remain incompletely understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patterns and clinical utility of genetic sequencing among patients with rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis from a prospectively maintained institutional registry.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 251 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between January 2017 and April 2024, who underwent genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Somatic tumor sequencing and circulating tumor DNA analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Response to total neoadjuvant therapy, local recurrence, and distant metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic testing utilization increased substantially from 2017 to 2024, with somatic next generation sequencing testing rising from 3% to 33% and circulating tumor DNA from 2% to over 45%. Tumor mutational burden did not correlate significantly with response to total neoadjuvant therapy, recurrence, or metastasis. Mutation profiles across carcinogenesis pathways showed no significant differences between complete responders and those with residual disease after adjustment (p = 0.145). After total neoadjuvant therapy, circulating tumor DNA positivity strongly correlated with residual disease (sensitivity: 76.5%, specificity: 82.4%; p = 0.0016), with tumor-agnostic circulating tumor DNA assays demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than tumor-informed tests (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, potential selection bias, single-center data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite increasing adoption, somatic next generation sequencing alone lacks clear prognostic or predictive utility for rectal cancer management. In contrast, circulating tumor DNA testing demonstrated substantial promise for assessing response to total neoadjuvant therapy, particularly using tumor-agnostic platforms. Further prospective studies are needed to refine clinical guidelines and fully integrate these genetic technologies into rectal cancer care. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003950\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基因测序技术的进步,包括体细胞下一代测序和循环肿瘤DNA检测,已经显著影响了直肠癌的治疗。然而,这些技术的临床意义仍然不完全清楚。目的:探讨直肠癌患者基因测序模式及其临床应用价值。设计:回顾性队列分析来自前瞻性维护的机构登记。环境:单一的国家癌症研究所指定的癌症中心。患者:在2017年1月至2024年4月期间,共有251名被诊断患有直肠癌的患者接受了基因检测。干预措施:体细胞肿瘤测序和循环肿瘤DNA分析。主要观察指标:对总新辅助治疗的反应、局部复发和远处转移。结果:从2017年到2024年,基因检测的使用率大幅上升,体细胞下一代测序检测从3%上升到33%,循环肿瘤DNA检测从2%上升到45%以上。肿瘤突变负荷与对新辅助治疗的反应、复发或转移没有显著相关性。癌变途径的突变谱在完全应答者和校正后残留病变者之间没有显著差异(p = 0.145)。在全部新辅助治疗后,循环肿瘤DNA阳性与残留疾病密切相关(敏感性:76.5%,特异性:82.4%,p = 0.0016),与肿瘤无关的循环肿瘤DNA检测的敏感性显著高于肿瘤知情检测(100%比50%,p = 0.03)。局限性:回顾性设计,潜在的选择偏差,单中心数据。结论:尽管越来越多的人采用,单独的下一代体细胞测序对直肠癌治疗缺乏明确的预后或预测效用。相比之下,循环肿瘤DNA检测在评估对总新辅助治疗的反应方面表现出了巨大的希望,特别是使用肿瘤不可知平台。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来完善临床指南,并将这些基因技术充分整合到直肠癌治疗中。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brave New World: Analysis of Early Clinical Experience with Molecular Sequencing in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer.

Background: Advances in genetic sequencing technologies, including somatic next-generation sequencing and circulating tumor DNA assays, have significantly impacted rectal cancer management. However, the clinical implications of these technologies remain incompletely understood.

Objective: To evaluate patterns and clinical utility of genetic sequencing among patients with rectal cancer.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis from a prospectively maintained institutional registry.

Setting: Single National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center.

Patients: A total of 251 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer between January 2017 and April 2024, who underwent genetic testing.

Interventions: Somatic tumor sequencing and circulating tumor DNA analysis.

Main outcome measures: Response to total neoadjuvant therapy, local recurrence, and distant metastasis.

Results: Genetic testing utilization increased substantially from 2017 to 2024, with somatic next generation sequencing testing rising from 3% to 33% and circulating tumor DNA from 2% to over 45%. Tumor mutational burden did not correlate significantly with response to total neoadjuvant therapy, recurrence, or metastasis. Mutation profiles across carcinogenesis pathways showed no significant differences between complete responders and those with residual disease after adjustment (p = 0.145). After total neoadjuvant therapy, circulating tumor DNA positivity strongly correlated with residual disease (sensitivity: 76.5%, specificity: 82.4%; p = 0.0016), with tumor-agnostic circulating tumor DNA assays demonstrating significantly higher sensitivity than tumor-informed tests (100% vs. 50%, p = 0.03).

Limitations: Retrospective design, potential selection bias, single-center data.

Conclusions: Despite increasing adoption, somatic next generation sequencing alone lacks clear prognostic or predictive utility for rectal cancer management. In contrast, circulating tumor DNA testing demonstrated substantial promise for assessing response to total neoadjuvant therapy, particularly using tumor-agnostic platforms. Further prospective studies are needed to refine clinical guidelines and fully integrate these genetic technologies into rectal cancer care. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信