Cia Solanke, Hassan Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Andreas Schedle, Katrin Bekes
{"title":"不同胶粘剂及预处理下复合树脂与mih影响硬组织的剪切结合强度。","authors":"Cia Solanke, Hassan Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Andreas Schedle, Katrin Bekes","doi":"10.3390/dj13080377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Reduced bond strengths in hypmineralised enamel have been reported with increased restorative failures. This study aimed to investigate the shear bond strengths of resin composite to hypomineralised enamel and dentin bonded with two different adhesive systems and pre-treatments. <b>Methods</b>: Thirty-six freshly extracted first permanent molars with MIH and 17 sound third molars were used for shear bond strength tests in enamel and dentin. Specimens of control groups were bonded to resin composite using Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus and Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond 1XT. MIH-affected enamel specimens of six test groups were pre-treated with various chemical agents, such as 35% phosphoric acid, 5% NaOCl, resin infiltration with ICON<sup>®</sup>, or a combination of these agents prior to bonding with composite resin using Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus. Bonded specimens were subsequently sheared at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min, after which their fracture modes were recorded. The mean bond strengths of all groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni-Holm analysis was performed for pairwise comparison between the groups. The association between modes of failure was examined with Pearson's chi-square test. <b>Results</b>: Mean shear bond strength values were highest for sound dentin specimens (Group SD 2) bonded with Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus (23.76 ± 7.68 MPa). Sound enamel specimens (Group SE 2) exhibited significantly higher mean bond strength values than MIH-enamel specimens (Group HE 2) when bonded with Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus (19.68 ± 6.25 vs. 11.53 ± 3.29 MPa, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Oxidative pre-treatment followed by resin infiltration significantly improved bond strengths to hypomineralised enamel (Group HE 6) (17.84 ± 2.98 MPa, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Bond strengths to sound and hypomineralised enamel and dentin did not differ significantly for both adhesives. <b>Conclusions</b>: Within the limitations of an in vitro study, oxidative pre-treatment in combination with resin infiltration seems to be beneficial when planning adhesive restorations with composite in hypomineralised enamel. Both Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus and Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond 1XT can be used for bonding of resin composite to MIH-affected enamel and dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear Bond Strengths of Composite Resin Bonded to MIH-Affected Hard Tissues with Different Adhesives and Pre-Treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Cia Solanke, Hassan Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Andreas Schedle, Katrin Bekes\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Reduced bond strengths in hypmineralised enamel have been reported with increased restorative failures. This study aimed to investigate the shear bond strengths of resin composite to hypomineralised enamel and dentin bonded with two different adhesive systems and pre-treatments. <b>Methods</b>: Thirty-six freshly extracted first permanent molars with MIH and 17 sound third molars were used for shear bond strength tests in enamel and dentin. Specimens of control groups were bonded to resin composite using Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus and Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond 1XT. MIH-affected enamel specimens of six test groups were pre-treated with various chemical agents, such as 35% phosphoric acid, 5% NaOCl, resin infiltration with ICON<sup>®</sup>, or a combination of these agents prior to bonding with composite resin using Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus. Bonded specimens were subsequently sheared at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min, after which their fracture modes were recorded. The mean bond strengths of all groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni-Holm analysis was performed for pairwise comparison between the groups. The association between modes of failure was examined with Pearson's chi-square test. <b>Results</b>: Mean shear bond strength values were highest for sound dentin specimens (Group SD 2) bonded with Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus (23.76 ± 7.68 MPa). Sound enamel specimens (Group SE 2) exhibited significantly higher mean bond strength values than MIH-enamel specimens (Group HE 2) when bonded with Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus (19.68 ± 6.25 vs. 11.53 ± 3.29 MPa, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Oxidative pre-treatment followed by resin infiltration significantly improved bond strengths to hypomineralised enamel (Group HE 6) (17.84 ± 2.98 MPa, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Bond strengths to sound and hypomineralised enamel and dentin did not differ significantly for both adhesives. <b>Conclusions</b>: Within the limitations of an in vitro study, oxidative pre-treatment in combination with resin infiltration seems to be beneficial when planning adhesive restorations with composite in hypomineralised enamel. Both Scotchbond<sup>TM</sup> Universal Plus and Adper<sup>TM</sup> Scotchbond 1XT can be used for bonding of resin composite to MIH-affected enamel and dentin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shear Bond Strengths of Composite Resin Bonded to MIH-Affected Hard Tissues with Different Adhesives and Pre-Treatments.
Background: Reduced bond strengths in hypmineralised enamel have been reported with increased restorative failures. This study aimed to investigate the shear bond strengths of resin composite to hypomineralised enamel and dentin bonded with two different adhesive systems and pre-treatments. Methods: Thirty-six freshly extracted first permanent molars with MIH and 17 sound third molars were used for shear bond strength tests in enamel and dentin. Specimens of control groups were bonded to resin composite using ScotchbondTM Universal Plus and AdperTM Scotchbond 1XT. MIH-affected enamel specimens of six test groups were pre-treated with various chemical agents, such as 35% phosphoric acid, 5% NaOCl, resin infiltration with ICON®, or a combination of these agents prior to bonding with composite resin using ScotchbondTM Universal Plus. Bonded specimens were subsequently sheared at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min, after which their fracture modes were recorded. The mean bond strengths of all groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni-Holm analysis was performed for pairwise comparison between the groups. The association between modes of failure was examined with Pearson's chi-square test. Results: Mean shear bond strength values were highest for sound dentin specimens (Group SD 2) bonded with ScotchbondTM Universal Plus (23.76 ± 7.68 MPa). Sound enamel specimens (Group SE 2) exhibited significantly higher mean bond strength values than MIH-enamel specimens (Group HE 2) when bonded with ScotchbondTM Universal Plus (19.68 ± 6.25 vs. 11.53 ± 3.29 MPa, p < 0.001). Oxidative pre-treatment followed by resin infiltration significantly improved bond strengths to hypomineralised enamel (Group HE 6) (17.84 ± 2.98 MPa, p < 0.05). Bond strengths to sound and hypomineralised enamel and dentin did not differ significantly for both adhesives. Conclusions: Within the limitations of an in vitro study, oxidative pre-treatment in combination with resin infiltration seems to be beneficial when planning adhesive restorations with composite in hypomineralised enamel. Both ScotchbondTM Universal Plus and AdperTM Scotchbond 1XT can be used for bonding of resin composite to MIH-affected enamel and dentin.