基于人工智能的TIRADS算法与已建立的甲状腺结节分类系统的诊断性能比较

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Abdilkadir Bozkuş, Yeliz Başar, Koray Güven
{"title":"基于人工智能的TIRADS算法与已建立的甲状腺结节分类系统的诊断性能比较","authors":"Abdilkadir Bozkuş, Yeliz Başar, Koray Güven","doi":"10.4274/dir.2025.253428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), with a particular focus on the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS (AI-TIRADS), in characterizing thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study conducted between April 2016 and May 2022, 1,322 thyroid nodules from 1,139 patients with confirmed cytopathological diagnoses were included. Each nodule was assessed using TIRADS classifications defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association (ATA-TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), the Korean Thyroid Association (K-TIRADS), and the AI-TIRADS. Three radiologists independently evaluated the ultrasound (US) characteristics of the nodules using all classification systems. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value, and comparisons were made using the McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the nodules, 846 (64%) were benign, 299 (22.6%) were of intermediate risk, and 147 (11.1%) were malignant. The AI-TIRADS demonstrated a PPV of 21.2% and a specificity of 53.6%, outperforming the other systems in specificity without compromising sensitivity. The specificities of the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 44.6%, 39.3%, 40.1%, and 40.1%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS: <i>P</i> < 0.001). The PPVs for the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 18.5%, 17.9%, 17.9%, and 17.4%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS, excluding the ACR-TIRADS: <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-TIRADS shows promise in improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies in thyroid nodule assessment while maintaining high sensitivity. The findings suggest that the AI-TIRADS may enhance risk stratification, leading to better patient management. Additionally, the study found that the presence of multiple suspicious US features markedly increases the risk of malignancy, whereas isolated features do not substantially elevate the risk.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The AI-TIRADS can enhance thyroid nodule risk stratification by improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies, potentially leading to more efficient patient management and better utilization of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS algorithm with established classification systems for thyroid nodules.\",\"authors\":\"Abdilkadir Bozkuş, Yeliz Başar, Koray Güven\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2025.253428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), with a particular focus on the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS (AI-TIRADS), in characterizing thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study conducted between April 2016 and May 2022, 1,322 thyroid nodules from 1,139 patients with confirmed cytopathological diagnoses were included. Each nodule was assessed using TIRADS classifications defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association (ATA-TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), the Korean Thyroid Association (K-TIRADS), and the AI-TIRADS. Three radiologists independently evaluated the ultrasound (US) characteristics of the nodules using all classification systems. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value, and comparisons were made using the McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the nodules, 846 (64%) were benign, 299 (22.6%) were of intermediate risk, and 147 (11.1%) were malignant. The AI-TIRADS demonstrated a PPV of 21.2% and a specificity of 53.6%, outperforming the other systems in specificity without compromising sensitivity. The specificities of the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 44.6%, 39.3%, 40.1%, and 40.1%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS: <i>P</i> < 0.001). The PPVs for the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 18.5%, 17.9%, 17.9%, and 17.4%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS, excluding the ACR-TIRADS: <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI-TIRADS shows promise in improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies in thyroid nodule assessment while maintaining high sensitivity. The findings suggest that the AI-TIRADS may enhance risk stratification, leading to better patient management. Additionally, the study found that the presence of multiple suspicious US features markedly increases the risk of malignancy, whereas isolated features do not substantially elevate the risk.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The AI-TIRADS can enhance thyroid nodule risk stratification by improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies, potentially leading to more efficient patient management and better utilization of healthcare resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2025.253428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估和比较各种甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)的诊断性能,特别关注基于人工智能的TIRADS (AI-TIRADS)在甲状腺结节特征方面的诊断性能。方法:本回顾性研究于2016年4月至2022年5月进行,纳入了1139例确诊的细胞病理学诊断的1,322例甲状腺结节。每个结节采用美国放射学会(ACR-TIRADS)、美国甲状腺协会(ATA-TIRADS)、欧洲甲状腺协会(EU-TIRADS)、韩国甲状腺协会(K-TIRADS)和AI-TIRADS定义的TIRADS分类进行评估。三位放射科医生使用所有分类系统独立评估结节的超声(US)特征。采用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值评估诊断效果,并采用McNemar试验进行比较。结果:良性846例(64%),中危299例(22.6%),恶性147例(11.1%)。AI-TIRADS的PPV为21.2%,特异性为53.6%,在不影响灵敏度的情况下,特异性优于其他系统。ACR-TIRADS、ATA-TIRADS、EU-TIRADS和K-TIRADS的特异性分别为44.6%、39.3%、40.1%和40.1%(与AI-TIRADS的两组比较均P < 0.001)。ACR-TIRADS、ATA-TIRADS、EU-TIRADS和K-TIRADS的ppv分别为18.5%、17.9%、17.9%和17.4%(均与AI-TIRADS两两比较,不包括ACR-TIRADS: P < 0.05)。结论:AI-TIRADS在提高甲状腺结节诊断特异性和减少不必要活检的同时保持了较高的敏感性。研究结果表明,AI-TIRADS可以增强风险分层,从而改善患者管理。此外,该研究发现,存在多个可疑的US特征会显著增加恶性肿瘤的风险,而孤立的特征不会显著提高风险。临床意义:AI-TIRADS可以通过提高诊断特异性和减少不必要的活检来加强甲状腺结节的风险分层,可能导致更有效的患者管理和更好地利用医疗资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS algorithm with established classification systems for thyroid nodules.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), with a particular focus on the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS (AI-TIRADS), in characterizing thyroid nodules.

Methods: In this retrospective study conducted between April 2016 and May 2022, 1,322 thyroid nodules from 1,139 patients with confirmed cytopathological diagnoses were included. Each nodule was assessed using TIRADS classifications defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association (ATA-TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), the Korean Thyroid Association (K-TIRADS), and the AI-TIRADS. Three radiologists independently evaluated the ultrasound (US) characteristics of the nodules using all classification systems. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value, and comparisons were made using the McNemar test.

Results: Among the nodules, 846 (64%) were benign, 299 (22.6%) were of intermediate risk, and 147 (11.1%) were malignant. The AI-TIRADS demonstrated a PPV of 21.2% and a specificity of 53.6%, outperforming the other systems in specificity without compromising sensitivity. The specificities of the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 44.6%, 39.3%, 40.1%, and 40.1%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS: P < 0.001). The PPVs for the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 18.5%, 17.9%, 17.9%, and 17.4%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS, excluding the ACR-TIRADS: P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The AI-TIRADS shows promise in improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies in thyroid nodule assessment while maintaining high sensitivity. The findings suggest that the AI-TIRADS may enhance risk stratification, leading to better patient management. Additionally, the study found that the presence of multiple suspicious US features markedly increases the risk of malignancy, whereas isolated features do not substantially elevate the risk.

Clinical significance: The AI-TIRADS can enhance thyroid nodule risk stratification by improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies, potentially leading to more efficient patient management and better utilization of healthcare resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信