用于青少年和年轻人牙齿美白的无过氧化氢颜色校正剂:体外和临床证据的系统综述。

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Madalina Boruga, Gianina Tapalaga, Magda Mihaela Luca, Bogdan Andrei Bumbu
{"title":"用于青少年和年轻人牙齿美白的无过氧化氢颜色校正剂:体外和临床证据的系统综述。","authors":"Madalina Boruga, Gianina Tapalaga, Magda Mihaela Luca, Bogdan Andrei Bumbu","doi":"10.3390/dj13080346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rising demand for aesthetic dental treatments has spurred interest in peroxide-free color correctors as alternatives to traditional hydrogen peroxide formulations, which are associated with tooth sensitivity and potential enamel demineralization. This systematic review evaluates the whitening efficacy and safety profile of hydrogen peroxide-free color corrector (HPFCC) products, focusing on color change metrics, enamel and dentin integrity, and adverse effects. <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science throughout January 2025 for randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and in vitro experiments comparing HPFCC to placebo or peroxide-based agents. The data extraction covered study design, sample characteristics, intervention details, shade improvement (ΔE00 or CIE Lab), enamel/dentin mechanical properties (microhardness, roughness, elastic modulus), and incidence of sensitivity or tissue irritation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for clinical studies and the QUIN tool for in vitro research. <b>Results:</b> Six studies (<i>n</i> = 20-80 samples or subjects) met the inclusion criteria. In vitro, HPFCC achieved mean ΔE00 values of 3.5 (bovine incisors; <i>n</i> = 80) and 2.8 (human molars; <i>n</i> = 20), versus up to 8.9 for carbamide peroxide (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Across studies, HPFCC achieved a mean ΔE00 of 2.8-3.5 surpassing the perceptibility threshold of 2.7 and approaching the clinical acceptability benchmark of 3.3. Surface microhardness increased by 12.9 ± 11.7 VHN with HPFCC (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and ultramicrohardness rose by 110 VHN over 56 days in prolonged use studies. No significant enamel erosion or dentin roughness changes were observed, and the sensitivity incidence remained below 3%. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings derive from one clinical trial (<i>n</i> = 60) and five in vitro studies (<i>n</i> = 20-80), encompassing violet-pigment serums and gels with differing concentrations. Due to heterogeneity in designs, formulations, and outcome measures, we conducted a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. Although HPFCC ΔE00 values were lower than those of carbamide peroxide, they consistently exceeded perceptibility thresholds while maintaining enamel integrity and causing sensitivity in fewer than 3% of subjects, supporting HPFCCs as moderate but safe alternatives for young patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Color Correctors for Tooth Whitening in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and Clinical Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Madalina Boruga, Gianina Tapalaga, Magda Mihaela Luca, Bogdan Andrei Bumbu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The rising demand for aesthetic dental treatments has spurred interest in peroxide-free color correctors as alternatives to traditional hydrogen peroxide formulations, which are associated with tooth sensitivity and potential enamel demineralization. This systematic review evaluates the whitening efficacy and safety profile of hydrogen peroxide-free color corrector (HPFCC) products, focusing on color change metrics, enamel and dentin integrity, and adverse effects. <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science throughout January 2025 for randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and in vitro experiments comparing HPFCC to placebo or peroxide-based agents. The data extraction covered study design, sample characteristics, intervention details, shade improvement (ΔE00 or CIE Lab), enamel/dentin mechanical properties (microhardness, roughness, elastic modulus), and incidence of sensitivity or tissue irritation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for clinical studies and the QUIN tool for in vitro research. <b>Results:</b> Six studies (<i>n</i> = 20-80 samples or subjects) met the inclusion criteria. In vitro, HPFCC achieved mean ΔE00 values of 3.5 (bovine incisors; <i>n</i> = 80) and 2.8 (human molars; <i>n</i> = 20), versus up to 8.9 for carbamide peroxide (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Across studies, HPFCC achieved a mean ΔE00 of 2.8-3.5 surpassing the perceptibility threshold of 2.7 and approaching the clinical acceptability benchmark of 3.3. Surface microhardness increased by 12.9 ± 11.7 VHN with HPFCC (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and ultramicrohardness rose by 110 VHN over 56 days in prolonged use studies. No significant enamel erosion or dentin roughness changes were observed, and the sensitivity incidence remained below 3%. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings derive from one clinical trial (<i>n</i> = 60) and five in vitro studies (<i>n</i> = 20-80), encompassing violet-pigment serums and gels with differing concentrations. Due to heterogeneity in designs, formulations, and outcome measures, we conducted a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. Although HPFCC ΔE00 values were lower than those of carbamide peroxide, they consistently exceeded perceptibility thresholds while maintaining enamel integrity and causing sensitivity in fewer than 3% of subjects, supporting HPFCCs as moderate but safe alternatives for young patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙科美容治疗需求的增长激发了人们对无过氧化氢颜色校正剂的兴趣,作为传统过氧化氢配方的替代品,过氧化氢配方与牙齿敏感和潜在的牙釉质脱矿有关。本系统综述评估了无过氧化氢颜色校正剂(HPFCC)产品的美白功效和安全性,重点关注颜色变化指标,牙釉质和牙本质完整性以及不良反应。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们在2025年1月检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,查找随机对照试验、观察性研究和体外实验,比较HPFCC与安慰剂或过氧化氢药物。数据提取包括研究设计、样品特征、干预细节、阴影改善(ΔE00或CIE Lab)、牙釉质/牙本质机械性能(显微硬度、粗糙度、弹性模量)以及敏感性或组织刺激的发生率。临床研究使用Cochrane工具,体外研究使用QUIN工具评估偏倚风险。结果:6项研究(n = 20-80个样本或受试者)符合纳入标准。体外,HPFCC的平均ΔE00值为3.5(牛门牙,n = 80)和2.8(人磨牙,n = 20),而过氧化脲的平均值为8.9 (p < 0.01)。在所有研究中,HPFCC的平均得分ΔE00为2.8-3.5,超过了2.7的感知阈值,接近3.3的临床可接受基准。HPFCC组表面显微硬度提高了12.9±11.7 VHN (p < 0.001),在长期使用研究中,超显微硬度在56天内提高了110 VHN。未观察到明显的牙釉质腐蚀或牙本质粗糙度变化,敏感性发生率保持在3%以下。结论:这些发现来自一项临床试验(n = 60)和五项体外研究(n = 20-80),涉及不同浓度的紫罗兰色素血清和凝胶。由于设计、配方和结果测量的异质性,我们进行了叙述性综合而不是荟萃分析。虽然HPFCC ΔE00值低于过氧化脲,但在保持牙釉质完整性的同时,它们始终超过感知阈值,并且在不到3%的受试者中引起敏感性,支持HPFCC作为年轻患者适度但安全的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Color Correctors for Tooth Whitening in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and Clinical Evidence.

Hydrogen Peroxide-Free Color Correctors for Tooth Whitening in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and Clinical Evidence.

Background: The rising demand for aesthetic dental treatments has spurred interest in peroxide-free color correctors as alternatives to traditional hydrogen peroxide formulations, which are associated with tooth sensitivity and potential enamel demineralization. This systematic review evaluates the whitening efficacy and safety profile of hydrogen peroxide-free color corrector (HPFCC) products, focusing on color change metrics, enamel and dentin integrity, and adverse effects. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science throughout January 2025 for randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and in vitro experiments comparing HPFCC to placebo or peroxide-based agents. The data extraction covered study design, sample characteristics, intervention details, shade improvement (ΔE00 or CIE Lab), enamel/dentin mechanical properties (microhardness, roughness, elastic modulus), and incidence of sensitivity or tissue irritation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for clinical studies and the QUIN tool for in vitro research. Results: Six studies (n = 20-80 samples or subjects) met the inclusion criteria. In vitro, HPFCC achieved mean ΔE00 values of 3.5 (bovine incisors; n = 80) and 2.8 (human molars; n = 20), versus up to 8.9 for carbamide peroxide (p < 0.01). Across studies, HPFCC achieved a mean ΔE00 of 2.8-3.5 surpassing the perceptibility threshold of 2.7 and approaching the clinical acceptability benchmark of 3.3. Surface microhardness increased by 12.9 ± 11.7 VHN with HPFCC (p < 0.001), and ultramicrohardness rose by 110 VHN over 56 days in prolonged use studies. No significant enamel erosion or dentin roughness changes were observed, and the sensitivity incidence remained below 3%. Conclusions: These findings derive from one clinical trial (n = 60) and five in vitro studies (n = 20-80), encompassing violet-pigment serums and gels with differing concentrations. Due to heterogeneity in designs, formulations, and outcome measures, we conducted a narrative synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. Although HPFCC ΔE00 values were lower than those of carbamide peroxide, they consistently exceeded perceptibility thresholds while maintaining enamel integrity and causing sensitivity in fewer than 3% of subjects, supporting HPFCCs as moderate but safe alternatives for young patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信