{"title":"超声成像:促进牙周病的诊断。","authors":"Gaël Y Rochefort, Frédéric Denis, Matthieu Renaud","doi":"10.3390/dj13080349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: This pilot study evaluates the correlation between periodontal pocket depth (PPD) measurements obtained by manual probing and those derived from an AI-coupled ultrasound imaging device in periodontitis patients. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Thirteen patients with periodontitis underwent ultrasonic probing with an AI engine for automated PPD measurements, followed by routine manual probing. <b>Results</b>: A total of 2088 manual and 1987 AI-based PPD measurements were collected. The mean PPD was 4.2 mm (range: 2-8 mm) for manual probing and 4.5 mm (range: 2-9 mm) for AI-based ultrasound, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.73). Discrepancies were noted in cases with inflammation or calculus. AI struggled to differentiate pocket depths in complex clinical scenarios. <b>Discussion</b>: Ultrasound imaging offers non-invasive, real-time visualization of periodontal structures, but AI accuracy requires further training to address image artifacts and clinical variability. <b>Conclusions</b>: The ultrasound device shows promise for non-invasive periodontal diagnostics but is not yet a direct alternative to manual probing. Further AI optimization and validation are needed. <b>Clinical Relevance</b>: This technology could enhance patient comfort and enable frequent monitoring, pending improvements in AI reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Imaging: Advancing the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Gaël Y Rochefort, Frédéric Denis, Matthieu Renaud\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: This pilot study evaluates the correlation between periodontal pocket depth (PPD) measurements obtained by manual probing and those derived from an AI-coupled ultrasound imaging device in periodontitis patients. <b>Materials and Methods</b>: Thirteen patients with periodontitis underwent ultrasonic probing with an AI engine for automated PPD measurements, followed by routine manual probing. <b>Results</b>: A total of 2088 manual and 1987 AI-based PPD measurements were collected. The mean PPD was 4.2 mm (range: 2-8 mm) for manual probing and 4.5 mm (range: 2-9 mm) for AI-based ultrasound, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.73). Discrepancies were noted in cases with inflammation or calculus. AI struggled to differentiate pocket depths in complex clinical scenarios. <b>Discussion</b>: Ultrasound imaging offers non-invasive, real-time visualization of periodontal structures, but AI accuracy requires further training to address image artifacts and clinical variability. <b>Conclusions</b>: The ultrasound device shows promise for non-invasive periodontal diagnostics but is not yet a direct alternative to manual probing. Further AI optimization and validation are needed. <b>Clinical Relevance</b>: This technology could enhance patient comfort and enable frequent monitoring, pending improvements in AI reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound Imaging: Advancing the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease.
Objectives: This pilot study evaluates the correlation between periodontal pocket depth (PPD) measurements obtained by manual probing and those derived from an AI-coupled ultrasound imaging device in periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients with periodontitis underwent ultrasonic probing with an AI engine for automated PPD measurements, followed by routine manual probing. Results: A total of 2088 manual and 1987 AI-based PPD measurements were collected. The mean PPD was 4.2 mm (range: 2-8 mm) for manual probing and 4.5 mm (range: 2-9 mm) for AI-based ultrasound, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.73). Discrepancies were noted in cases with inflammation or calculus. AI struggled to differentiate pocket depths in complex clinical scenarios. Discussion: Ultrasound imaging offers non-invasive, real-time visualization of periodontal structures, but AI accuracy requires further training to address image artifacts and clinical variability. Conclusions: The ultrasound device shows promise for non-invasive periodontal diagnostics but is not yet a direct alternative to manual probing. Further AI optimization and validation are needed. Clinical Relevance: This technology could enhance patient comfort and enable frequent monitoring, pending improvements in AI reliability.