George Kokkinos, Maryam Hafeez, Joseph De Leon, Georgios E Romanos
{"title":"脉冲红外激光对体外不同温度氧化锆植入物的热效应。","authors":"George Kokkinos, Maryam Hafeez, Joseph De Leon, Georgios E Romanos","doi":"10.3390/dj13080342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to determine the differential temperature produced on ceramic implants using laser irradiation on a pulsed setting of intrabony defects in vitro. <b>Methods:</b> A ceramic (Zr) dental implant (Zeramex, 4.8 × 12 mm) was placed into a bovine bone block. A three-wall intrabony defect (6 × 4 × 3 mm) was created to mimic an osseous peri-implant defect. Thermocouples were placed on the apical and coronal areas to measure temperature changes (∆T) during 60 s of laser irradiation. The bovine block was heated to 37 °C, and the defect walls were irradiated with the CO<sub>2</sub> and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The settings used were pulsed mode for both lasers, with 30 Hz and 1.5 W for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and 70 Hz and 2 W for the CO<sub>2</sub> laser. The same laser settings were repeated at room temperature (RT, 23 °C). Twenty trials were performed for each experimental group at room and body temperature for assessment of ∆T. Paired t-test were used to compare the measurements between 37 °C and 23 °C for the Er,Cr:YSGG, and CO<sub>2</sub> laser, respectively. <b>Results:</b> The CO<sub>2</sub> laser resulted in the highest ∆T (°C) at the coronal (15.22 ± 0.28/8.82 ± 0.21) and apical (5.84 ± 0.14/2.30 ± 0.28) level when this laser was used in both room temperature and body temperature, respectively. The highest ∆T (°C) for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at body temperature at the coronal thermocouple was 7.64 ± 0.55, while for the CO<sub>2</sub> laser, at body temperature was 8.82 ± 0.21. <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of our study, the use of CO<sub>2</sub> laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on peri-implant defects generally appears to be safe in treating peri-implant defects around zirconia implants in vitro.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal Effects of Pulsed Infrared Lasers on Zirconia Implants at Different Temperatures In Vitro.\",\"authors\":\"George Kokkinos, Maryam Hafeez, Joseph De Leon, Georgios E Romanos\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj13080342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to determine the differential temperature produced on ceramic implants using laser irradiation on a pulsed setting of intrabony defects in vitro. <b>Methods:</b> A ceramic (Zr) dental implant (Zeramex, 4.8 × 12 mm) was placed into a bovine bone block. A three-wall intrabony defect (6 × 4 × 3 mm) was created to mimic an osseous peri-implant defect. Thermocouples were placed on the apical and coronal areas to measure temperature changes (∆T) during 60 s of laser irradiation. The bovine block was heated to 37 °C, and the defect walls were irradiated with the CO<sub>2</sub> and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The settings used were pulsed mode for both lasers, with 30 Hz and 1.5 W for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and 70 Hz and 2 W for the CO<sub>2</sub> laser. The same laser settings were repeated at room temperature (RT, 23 °C). Twenty trials were performed for each experimental group at room and body temperature for assessment of ∆T. Paired t-test were used to compare the measurements between 37 °C and 23 °C for the Er,Cr:YSGG, and CO<sub>2</sub> laser, respectively. <b>Results:</b> The CO<sub>2</sub> laser resulted in the highest ∆T (°C) at the coronal (15.22 ± 0.28/8.82 ± 0.21) and apical (5.84 ± 0.14/2.30 ± 0.28) level when this laser was used in both room temperature and body temperature, respectively. The highest ∆T (°C) for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at body temperature at the coronal thermocouple was 7.64 ± 0.55, while for the CO<sub>2</sub> laser, at body temperature was 8.82 ± 0.21. <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of our study, the use of CO<sub>2</sub> laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on peri-implant defects generally appears to be safe in treating peri-implant defects around zirconia implants in vitro.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384814/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13080342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thermal Effects of Pulsed Infrared Lasers on Zirconia Implants at Different Temperatures In Vitro.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the differential temperature produced on ceramic implants using laser irradiation on a pulsed setting of intrabony defects in vitro. Methods: A ceramic (Zr) dental implant (Zeramex, 4.8 × 12 mm) was placed into a bovine bone block. A three-wall intrabony defect (6 × 4 × 3 mm) was created to mimic an osseous peri-implant defect. Thermocouples were placed on the apical and coronal areas to measure temperature changes (∆T) during 60 s of laser irradiation. The bovine block was heated to 37 °C, and the defect walls were irradiated with the CO2 and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The settings used were pulsed mode for both lasers, with 30 Hz and 1.5 W for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and 70 Hz and 2 W for the CO2 laser. The same laser settings were repeated at room temperature (RT, 23 °C). Twenty trials were performed for each experimental group at room and body temperature for assessment of ∆T. Paired t-test were used to compare the measurements between 37 °C and 23 °C for the Er,Cr:YSGG, and CO2 laser, respectively. Results: The CO2 laser resulted in the highest ∆T (°C) at the coronal (15.22 ± 0.28/8.82 ± 0.21) and apical (5.84 ± 0.14/2.30 ± 0.28) level when this laser was used in both room temperature and body temperature, respectively. The highest ∆T (°C) for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at body temperature at the coronal thermocouple was 7.64 ± 0.55, while for the CO2 laser, at body temperature was 8.82 ± 0.21. Conclusion: Within the limitations of our study, the use of CO2 laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on peri-implant defects generally appears to be safe in treating peri-implant defects around zirconia implants in vitro.