{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗在台湾广泛期小细胞肺癌患者中的实际有效性和安全性。","authors":"Cheng-Yu Chang, Yu-Feng Wei, Shih-Chieh Chang, Chung-Yu Chen","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32080472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has poor prognosis. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy show survival benefits in trials, real-world data from Asia are scarce. This study evaluates real-world efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without ICIs in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC and identifies survival predictors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analyzed 114 patients with ES-SCLC treated between 2017 and 2023 at four Taiwanese medical centers. Patients received first-line chemotherapy alone (<i>n</i> = 68) or with ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, pembrolizumab; <i>n</i> = 46). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed via Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable, except poorer ECOG performance (≥2) in the chemotherapy group (27% vs. 9%; <i>p</i> = 0.021). IO-chemotherapy significantly improved OS (16.1 vs. 9.4 months; HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.52; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PFS (7.8 vs. 5.5 months; HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed IO-chemotherapy as an independent positive predictor (OS adjusted HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14-0.44; PFS adjusted HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Skin rash was more common with IO-chemotherapy (24% vs. 3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Immune-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with improved survival (median OS: 21.4 months with 1-2 AEs, 16.6 months with 3-4 AEs, 12.5 months without AEs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunochemotherapy significantly improves survival in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC, with manageable toxicity, supporting ICIs' incorporation into standard treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Taiwanese Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Yu Chang, Yu-Feng Wei, Shih-Chieh Chang, Chung-Yu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32080472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has poor prognosis. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy show survival benefits in trials, real-world data from Asia are scarce. This study evaluates real-world efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without ICIs in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC and identifies survival predictors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analyzed 114 patients with ES-SCLC treated between 2017 and 2023 at four Taiwanese medical centers. Patients received first-line chemotherapy alone (<i>n</i> = 68) or with ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, pembrolizumab; <i>n</i> = 46). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed via Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable, except poorer ECOG performance (≥2) in the chemotherapy group (27% vs. 9%; <i>p</i> = 0.021). IO-chemotherapy significantly improved OS (16.1 vs. 9.4 months; HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.52; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PFS (7.8 vs. 5.5 months; HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed IO-chemotherapy as an independent positive predictor (OS adjusted HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14-0.44; PFS adjusted HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Skin rash was more common with IO-chemotherapy (24% vs. 3%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Immune-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with improved survival (median OS: 21.4 months with 1-2 AEs, 16.6 months with 3-4 AEs, 12.5 months without AEs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immunochemotherapy significantly improves survival in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC, with manageable toxicity, supporting ICIs' incorporation into standard treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080472\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)预后不良。虽然免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)与化疗在试验中显示出生存益处,但来自亚洲的真实数据很少。本研究评估台湾ES-SCLC患者使用或不使用ICIs化疗的实际疗效和安全性,并确定生存预测因子。材料和方法:一项回顾性队列研究分析了2017年至2023年在台湾四家医疗中心接受治疗的114例ES-SCLC患者。患者接受一线化疗(n = 68)或联合使用ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, pembrolizumab; n = 46)。主要终点是通过Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归评估的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:基线特征具有可比性,除了化疗组ECOG表现较差(≥2)(27% vs. 9%; p = 0.021)。io -化疗显著改善OS (16.1 vs 9.4个月;HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.52; p < 0.001)和PFS (7.8 vs 5.5个月;HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63; p < 0.001)。多因素分析证实io化疗是独立的阳性预测因子(OS校正HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14-0.44; PFS校正HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61, p均< 0.001)。皮肤皮疹在io化疗中更为常见(24%比3%;p < 0.001)。免疫相关不良事件(ae)与改善的生存相关(中位OS: 21.4个月有1-2个ae, 16.6个月有3-4个ae, 12.5个月无ae)。结论:免疫化疗可显著提高台湾ES-SCLC患者的生存率,且毒性可控,支持将ICIs纳入标准治疗。
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Taiwanese Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Purpose: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has poor prognosis. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy show survival benefits in trials, real-world data from Asia are scarce. This study evaluates real-world efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without ICIs in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC and identifies survival predictors.
Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 114 patients with ES-SCLC treated between 2017 and 2023 at four Taiwanese medical centers. Patients received first-line chemotherapy alone (n = 68) or with ICIs (atezolizumab, durvalumab, pembrolizumab; n = 46). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), assessed via Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, except poorer ECOG performance (≥2) in the chemotherapy group (27% vs. 9%; p = 0.021). IO-chemotherapy significantly improved OS (16.1 vs. 9.4 months; HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.20-0.52; p < 0.001) and PFS (7.8 vs. 5.5 months; HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.63; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed IO-chemotherapy as an independent positive predictor (OS adjusted HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.14-0.44; PFS adjusted HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; both p < 0.001). Skin rash was more common with IO-chemotherapy (24% vs. 3%; p < 0.001). Immune-related adverse events (AEs) correlated with improved survival (median OS: 21.4 months with 1-2 AEs, 16.6 months with 3-4 AEs, 12.5 months without AEs).
Conclusion: Immunochemotherapy significantly improves survival in Taiwanese patients with ES-SCLC, with manageable toxicity, supporting ICIs' incorporation into standard treatment.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.