引入公共资助的基因检测项目后,BRCA1和BRCA2检测的使用趋势。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe
{"title":"引入公共资助的基因检测项目后,BRCA1和BRCA2检测的使用趋势。","authors":"Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32080439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (<i>n</i> = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, <i>p</i> = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the Utilization of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.\",\"authors\":\"Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32080439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (<i>n</i> = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, <i>p</i> = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了有效地减轻癌症负担,基因检测项目应该在癌症发展之前识别出高风险个体,从而实施降低风险的策略。我们评估了公共资助的BRCA1/BRCA2检测项目实施后的趋势。方法:我们对加拿大安大略省(2007-2016年)接受BRCA1/BRCA2检测的女性进行了一项回顾性、近人群研究(n = 15,986)。使用线性和泊松回归评估时间趋势。结果:尽管每年的检测使用率随着时间的推移而增加(p < 0.001),但检测的平均年龄从2007年的49.9岁(SD 13.8)增加到2016年的53.8岁(SD 13.7) (p < 0.001)。有癌症病史的女性接受检测的比例也从2007年的53.5%增加到2015年的66.3% (p < 0.001);无乳腺癌妇女的比例没有显著变化(2007年为49.2%,2015年为45.1%,p = 0.90)。随着时间的推移,在诊断后3个月内接受乳腺癌检测的人数占所有检测人数的比例有所增加(2007年为0.39%,2015年为13.6%;p < 0.001)。结论:虽然公共资助基因检测项目的建立与使用率上升有关,但检测年龄的增加和未受影响妇女检测的减少表明,在识别符合风险降低条件的高风险个体方面存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends in the Utilization of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.

Trends in the Utilization of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.

Trends in the Utilization of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.

Trends in the Utilization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.

Purpose: To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in BRCA1/BRCA2 testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (n = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.

Results: Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (p < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (p < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, p = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信