Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe
{"title":"引入公共资助的基因检测项目后,BRCA1和BRCA2检测的使用趋势。","authors":"Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32080439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (<i>n</i> = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, <i>p</i> = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in the Utilization of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.\",\"authors\":\"Fahima Dossa, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen, Kelly Metcalfe\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32080439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>BRCA2</i> testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (<i>n</i> = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (<i>p</i> < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, <i>p</i> = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080439\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trends in the Utilization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program.
Purpose: To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in BRCA1/BRCA2 testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007-2016) (n = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression.
Results: Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (p < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (p < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, p = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.