Abrar Roshdy Abouelkheir, Ana Cristina Diniz Silva, Asmaa Mohamed Ahmed Sayed, Ahmed Mohey Eldin Elbehery, Omar Haytham, Asmaa Mohammad Moawad
{"title":"注射肉毒杆菌毒素后的医源性肉毒杆菌中毒:临床特征、危险因素和皮肤因素的范围审查。","authors":"Abrar Roshdy Abouelkheir, Ana Cristina Diniz Silva, Asmaa Mohamed Ahmed Sayed, Ahmed Mohey Eldin Elbehery, Omar Haytham, Asmaa Mohammad Moawad","doi":"10.1080/15569527.2025.2547599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study purpose: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is commonly used for both cosmetic and medical purposes. However, improper use can lead to iatrogenic botulism. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the systemic and skin-related effects, identify risk factors, and highlight safety gaps in BoNT-related botulism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines to search for literature from 1997 to 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Ten case reports (113 patient cases) met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females accounted for 78.8% of cases. Systemic symptoms typically developed within four days after the injection. Notably, 46% of cases involved unlicensed BoNT products, raising safety concerns. Among the licensed formulations, Abobotulinum toxin A accounted for 33.6% of cases, Onabotulinum toxin A for 10.6%, and other or unspecified products for 9.7%. Doses ranged from 100 to 2000 units (average of 487±312 units). Intramuscular injection was the most common method at 60.2%. Common symptoms included dysphagia in 82.3% of cases, ptosis in 78.8%, and generalized weakness in 65.5%. Respiratory failure occurred in 12.4% of severe cases. Interestingly, there were no consistent reports of skin or injection-site reactions, suggesting potential underreporting of skin-related effects. Treatments included antitoxin in 59.3% of cases and pyridostigmine in 24.8%. The majority of patients, 86.7%, fully recovered, though six experienced symptoms lasting over six months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both licensed and unlicensed BoNT products can lead to iatrogenic botulism. Inconsistent reporting of skin complications highlights a gap in safety data. Adhering to proper injection protocols and thoroughly documenting adverse events is crucial for enhancing patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11023,"journal":{"name":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iatrogenic botulism following botulinum toxin injection: a scoping review of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and dermal considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Abrar Roshdy Abouelkheir, Ana Cristina Diniz Silva, Asmaa Mohamed Ahmed Sayed, Ahmed Mohey Eldin Elbehery, Omar Haytham, Asmaa Mohammad Moawad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15569527.2025.2547599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study purpose: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is commonly used for both cosmetic and medical purposes. However, improper use can lead to iatrogenic botulism. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the systemic and skin-related effects, identify risk factors, and highlight safety gaps in BoNT-related botulism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines to search for literature from 1997 to 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Ten case reports (113 patient cases) met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females accounted for 78.8% of cases. Systemic symptoms typically developed within four days after the injection. Notably, 46% of cases involved unlicensed BoNT products, raising safety concerns. Among the licensed formulations, Abobotulinum toxin A accounted for 33.6% of cases, Onabotulinum toxin A for 10.6%, and other or unspecified products for 9.7%. Doses ranged from 100 to 2000 units (average of 487±312 units). Intramuscular injection was the most common method at 60.2%. Common symptoms included dysphagia in 82.3% of cases, ptosis in 78.8%, and generalized weakness in 65.5%. Respiratory failure occurred in 12.4% of severe cases. Interestingly, there were no consistent reports of skin or injection-site reactions, suggesting potential underreporting of skin-related effects. Treatments included antitoxin in 59.3% of cases and pyridostigmine in 24.8%. The majority of patients, 86.7%, fully recovered, though six experienced symptoms lasting over six months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both licensed and unlicensed BoNT products can lead to iatrogenic botulism. Inconsistent reporting of skin complications highlights a gap in safety data. Adhering to proper injection protocols and thoroughly documenting adverse events is crucial for enhancing patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2025.2547599\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2025.2547599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Iatrogenic botulism following botulinum toxin injection: a scoping review of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and dermal considerations.
Study purpose: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is commonly used for both cosmetic and medical purposes. However, improper use can lead to iatrogenic botulism. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the systemic and skin-related effects, identify risk factors, and highlight safety gaps in BoNT-related botulism.
Methods: We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines to search for literature from 1997 to 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Ten case reports (113 patient cases) met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Females accounted for 78.8% of cases. Systemic symptoms typically developed within four days after the injection. Notably, 46% of cases involved unlicensed BoNT products, raising safety concerns. Among the licensed formulations, Abobotulinum toxin A accounted for 33.6% of cases, Onabotulinum toxin A for 10.6%, and other or unspecified products for 9.7%. Doses ranged from 100 to 2000 units (average of 487±312 units). Intramuscular injection was the most common method at 60.2%. Common symptoms included dysphagia in 82.3% of cases, ptosis in 78.8%, and generalized weakness in 65.5%. Respiratory failure occurred in 12.4% of severe cases. Interestingly, there were no consistent reports of skin or injection-site reactions, suggesting potential underreporting of skin-related effects. Treatments included antitoxin in 59.3% of cases and pyridostigmine in 24.8%. The majority of patients, 86.7%, fully recovered, though six experienced symptoms lasting over six months.
Conclusion: Both licensed and unlicensed BoNT products can lead to iatrogenic botulism. Inconsistent reporting of skin complications highlights a gap in safety data. Adhering to proper injection protocols and thoroughly documenting adverse events is crucial for enhancing patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all types of harm to cutaneous and ocular systems. Areas of particular interest include pharmaceutical and medical products; consumer, personal care, and household products; and issues in environmental and occupational exposures.
In addition to original research papers, reviews and short communications are invited, as well as concise, relevant, and critical reviews of topics of contemporary significance.