剂量密集化疗在乳腺癌中的疗效和安全性:真实临床数据和文献综述。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Keiko Yanagihara, Masato Yoshida, Tamami Yamakawa, Sena Kato, Miki Tamura, Koji Nagata
{"title":"剂量密集化疗在乳腺癌中的疗效和安全性:真实临床数据和文献综述。","authors":"Keiko Yanagihara, Masato Yoshida, Tamami Yamakawa, Sena Kato, Miki Tamura, Koji Nagata","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32080441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen included epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel, with pegfilgrastim support. The overall treatment completion rate was 82.5%. Of the 80 patients, 55 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (59.1%) compared to that in luminal-type cancer (9.1%). Common adverse events included anemia, liver dysfunction, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% of patients, with some cases linked to pegfilgrastim body pod use, particularly in individuals with low subcutaneous fat. Notably, two patients developed pneumocystis pneumonia, potentially associated with steroid administration. Despite these toxicities, most were manageable and resolved after treatment. Our findings support the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, while highlighting the importance of individualized supportive care and vigilance regarding hematologic and infectious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Keiko Yanagihara, Masato Yoshida, Tamami Yamakawa, Sena Kato, Miki Tamura, Koji Nagata\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32080441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen included epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel, with pegfilgrastim support. The overall treatment completion rate was 82.5%. Of the 80 patients, 55 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (59.1%) compared to that in luminal-type cancer (9.1%). Common adverse events included anemia, liver dysfunction, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% of patients, with some cases linked to pegfilgrastim body pod use, particularly in individuals with low subcutaneous fat. Notably, two patients developed pneumocystis pneumonia, potentially associated with steroid administration. Despite these toxicities, most were manageable and resolved after treatment. Our findings support the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, while highlighting the importance of individualized supportive care and vigilance regarding hematologic and infectious complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

剂量密集化疗缩短了化疗周期之间的间隔,在高危乳腺癌患者中显示出改善的结果。我们回顾性评估了2020年至2024年在我院治疗的80例乳腺癌患者的剂量密集化疗的疗效和安全性。该方案包括表柔比星和环磷酰胺,随后是紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇,peg非格昔汀支持。总治疗完成率为82.5%。80例患者中,55例接受了新辅助化疗,三阴性乳腺癌的病理完全缓解率(59.1%)明显高于光型乳腺癌(9.1%)。常见的不良事件包括贫血、肝功能障碍、肌痛和周围神经病变。8.8%的患者出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症,一些病例与聚非格拉西汀体荚的使用有关,特别是在皮下脂肪含量低的患者中。值得注意的是,两名患者发生肺囊虫性肺炎,可能与类固醇给药有关。尽管有这些毒性,但大多数是可控的,并在治疗后消退。我们的研究结果支持剂量密集化疗的疗效,特别是在三阴性乳腺癌中,同时强调个体化支持治疗和警惕血液学和感染并发症的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review.

Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review.

Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review.

Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen included epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel, with pegfilgrastim support. The overall treatment completion rate was 82.5%. Of the 80 patients, 55 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (59.1%) compared to that in luminal-type cancer (9.1%). Common adverse events included anemia, liver dysfunction, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% of patients, with some cases linked to pegfilgrastim body pod use, particularly in individuals with low subcutaneous fat. Notably, two patients developed pneumocystis pneumonia, potentially associated with steroid administration. Despite these toxicities, most were manageable and resolved after treatment. Our findings support the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, while highlighting the importance of individualized supportive care and vigilance regarding hematologic and infectious complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信