旁观者对技术辅助性约会虐待干预机会的检测:量表验证及其相关关系。

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Maria Vale, Denise Hines, Marlene Matos
{"title":"旁观者对技术辅助性约会虐待干预机会的检测:量表验证及其相关关系。","authors":"Maria Vale, Denise Hines, Marlene Matos","doi":"10.1177/21522715251372433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technology-facilitated sexual dating abuse (TFSDA) involves non-consensual sexual behaviors in relationships-such as sharing nude/sexual content-often visible to bystanders, who can intervene and reduce its impact. In Portugal, the lack of assessment measures limits understanding of which intervention opportunities are detected and which adolescents detect them. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the Scale of Bystanders' Detection of Intervention Opportunities in TFSDA-adapted from the Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships Scale-estimate the prevalence of detection, and examine associations between detection and gender, age, victimization and/or perpetration. Between February and May 2023, 1,604 Portuguese adolescents (51.4% cisgender boys; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 14.92, <i>SD</i> = 1.73) in grades 7-12 from 25 schools in northern and central Portugal completed an online questionnaire. This sample was divided into calibration (<i>n</i><sub>1</sub> = 444) and validation (<i>n</i><sub>2</sub> = 579, <i>n</i><sub>3</sub> = 581). Exploratory factor analysis identified an 8-item, two-factor structure-<i>Sexual Coercion</i> and <i>Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse</i>-explaining 53% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit indices, and measurement invariance was achieved for gender and age. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable, with high reliability across samples. Results indicate that 21.3% of adolescents detected intervention opportunities in TFSDA. Cisgender girl were less likely, while older adolescents were more likely, to detect <i>Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse</i>. Victims and victim-perpetrators of TFSDA reported higher detection rates. Findings support the scale's psychometric robustness and its utility in research, clinical, and forensic contexts, while highlighting groups that may benefit from awareness or skills training to address TFSDA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":" ","pages":"636-644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bystanders' Detection of Intervention Opportunities in Technology-Facilitated Sexual Dating Abuse: Scale Validation and Correlates.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Vale, Denise Hines, Marlene Matos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21522715251372433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Technology-facilitated sexual dating abuse (TFSDA) involves non-consensual sexual behaviors in relationships-such as sharing nude/sexual content-often visible to bystanders, who can intervene and reduce its impact. In Portugal, the lack of assessment measures limits understanding of which intervention opportunities are detected and which adolescents detect them. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the Scale of Bystanders' Detection of Intervention Opportunities in TFSDA-adapted from the Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships Scale-estimate the prevalence of detection, and examine associations between detection and gender, age, victimization and/or perpetration. Between February and May 2023, 1,604 Portuguese adolescents (51.4% cisgender boys; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 14.92, <i>SD</i> = 1.73) in grades 7-12 from 25 schools in northern and central Portugal completed an online questionnaire. This sample was divided into calibration (<i>n</i><sub>1</sub> = 444) and validation (<i>n</i><sub>2</sub> = 579, <i>n</i><sub>3</sub> = 581). Exploratory factor analysis identified an 8-item, two-factor structure-<i>Sexual Coercion</i> and <i>Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse</i>-explaining 53% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit indices, and measurement invariance was achieved for gender and age. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable, with high reliability across samples. Results indicate that 21.3% of adolescents detected intervention opportunities in TFSDA. Cisgender girl were less likely, while older adolescents were more likely, to detect <i>Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse</i>. Victims and victim-perpetrators of TFSDA reported higher detection rates. Findings support the scale's psychometric robustness and its utility in research, clinical, and forensic contexts, while highlighting groups that may benefit from awareness or skills training to address TFSDA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"636-644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21522715251372433\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21522715251372433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术促进的性约会虐待(TFSDA)涉及关系中未经双方同意的性行为,例如分享裸体/性内容,这些行为通常会被旁观者看到,他们可以干预并减少其影响。在葡萄牙,缺乏评估措施限制了人们对哪些干预机会被发现以及哪些青少年发现了这些机会的了解。本研究旨在分析tfs5中旁观者干预机会检测量表(改编自《技术促进的人际关系虐待量表》)的心理测量特征,估计检测的普遍性,并研究检测与性别、年龄、受害和/或施暴者之间的关系。在2023年2月至5月期间,来自葡萄牙北部和中部25所学校的7-12年级的1604名葡萄牙青少年(51.4%为顺性别男孩;Mage = 14.92, SD = 1.73)完成了一份在线问卷。样品分为定标样品(n1 = 444)和验证样品(n2 = 579, n3 = 581)。探索性因素分析确定了一个8项的双因素结构——性胁迫和基于图像的性骚扰/虐待——解释了53%的方差。验证性因子分析显示了良好的拟合指标,并实现了性别和年龄的测量不变性。收敛效度和判别效度是可接受的,在样本间具有较高的信度。结果显示,21.3%的青少年在TFSDA中发现了干预机会。顺性别女孩不太可能察觉到基于图像的性骚扰/性虐待,而年龄较大的青少年则更可能察觉到。TFSDA的受害者和受害者加害人报告的检出率较高。研究结果支持该量表的心理测量稳健性及其在研究、临床和法医环境中的实用性,同时强调了可能从解决TFSDA的意识或技能培训中受益的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bystanders' Detection of Intervention Opportunities in Technology-Facilitated Sexual Dating Abuse: Scale Validation and Correlates.

Technology-facilitated sexual dating abuse (TFSDA) involves non-consensual sexual behaviors in relationships-such as sharing nude/sexual content-often visible to bystanders, who can intervene and reduce its impact. In Portugal, the lack of assessment measures limits understanding of which intervention opportunities are detected and which adolescents detect them. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the Scale of Bystanders' Detection of Intervention Opportunities in TFSDA-adapted from the Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Relationships Scale-estimate the prevalence of detection, and examine associations between detection and gender, age, victimization and/or perpetration. Between February and May 2023, 1,604 Portuguese adolescents (51.4% cisgender boys; Mage = 14.92, SD = 1.73) in grades 7-12 from 25 schools in northern and central Portugal completed an online questionnaire. This sample was divided into calibration (n1 = 444) and validation (n2 = 579, n3 = 581). Exploratory factor analysis identified an 8-item, two-factor structure-Sexual Coercion and Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse-explaining 53% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit indices, and measurement invariance was achieved for gender and age. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable, with high reliability across samples. Results indicate that 21.3% of adolescents detected intervention opportunities in TFSDA. Cisgender girl were less likely, while older adolescents were more likely, to detect Image-Based Sexual Harassment/Abuse. Victims and victim-perpetrators of TFSDA reported higher detection rates. Findings support the scale's psychometric robustness and its utility in research, clinical, and forensic contexts, while highlighting groups that may benefit from awareness or skills training to address TFSDA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信