Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier
{"title":"实验室内外的血糖测量:分析前和分析前的挑战。","authors":"Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges.
Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.