实验室内外的血糖测量:分析前和分析前的挑战。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier
{"title":"实验室内外的血糖测量:分析前和分析前的挑战。","authors":"Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Grzych, Inès Defauwes, Pascal de Tullio, Jean David Pekar, Thierry Brousseau, Giuseppe Lippi, Etienne Cavalier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄糖测量是代谢性疾病管理的关键研究,特别是在糖尿病和遗传性疾病中。然而,基于实验室和手持点护理(HPOC)(血糖仪)血糖检测面临重大的分析前和分析挑战。在中心实验室,未离心样品的糖酵解会导致葡萄糖消耗,这可能会损害诊断的准确性。虽然氟化钠(NaF)通常被用作糖酵解抑制剂,但它具有延迟效应,需要数小时才能稳定葡萄糖浓度。最近,柠檬酸缓冲NaF-EDTA (FCE)管被引入来更有效地抑制糖酵解,但它们仍未得到充分利用。分析前变量,包括样品采集、运输和处理延迟,进一步影响葡萄糖稳定性和糖尿病的诊断,包括妊娠糖尿病(GDM)。HPOC设备通过提供快速结果和最小化分析前误差提供了另一种选择,但血糖仪容易受到生理和分析干扰,如红细胞压积变化、环境条件、氧化还原活性药物的存在和酶特异性问题。这些干扰可能导致血糖读数不准确,影响临床决策,特别是在重症监护和急诊环境中。此外,毛细血管和静脉血糖浓度的差异可能导致误诊和不适当的血糖管理。这篇综述提供了葡萄糖测量方法的全面分析,它们的局限性和潜在的改进,强调了实验室测试分析前协调和更好地理解HPOC测试中的干扰的必要性。标准化血液样本处理和采用优化的采集管可以提高血糖测量的可靠性,最终改善糖尿病的诊断和患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges.

Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信