Ela Giladi, Ilya Losin, Ziad Arow, Ranin Hilu, Oded Sabah, Rami Barashi, Alexander Omelchenko, Yoav Arnson, Abid Assali, David Pereg
{"title":"-受体阻滞剂治疗急性心肌梗死的时间趋势及其对预后的影响。","authors":"Ela Giladi, Ilya Losin, Ziad Arow, Ranin Hilu, Oded Sabah, Rami Barashi, Alexander Omelchenko, Yoav Arnson, Abid Assali, David Pereg","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early beta-blocker treatment has long been recommended for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is reduced; however, whether beta-blocker therapy improves outcomes in patients with AMI receiving contemporary treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends in the effect of beta-blocker therapy on outcomes of patients with AMI in a large, nationwide cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AMI enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes Israeli Survey from 2000 to 2021 were included. They were categorized into three periods: early (2000-2004), mid (2006-2016), and late (2018-2021). Each period group was further divided into two subgroups based on LVEF (>40 and ≤40%) and then stratified by beta-blocker treatment status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 11 569 patients. Among patients with LVEF less than 40%, beta-blocker treatment was associated with improved 1-year survival rates in the early (9.1 vs. 20.4%; P < 0.001) and mid (10 vs. 20.6%; P < 0.001) periods only. Among patients with LVEF greater than or equal to 40%, beta-blocker treatment was linked to enhanced 1-year survival in patients enrolled in the early period (3.4 vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001), but not in the mid and late periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between beta-blocker treatment and improved survival in patients with AMI has diminished over recent decades, regardless of LVEF. These findings are likely attributed to the advancements in contemporary medical and revascularization therapy. As such, our results may challenge current recommendations regarding beta-blocker therapy in AMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal trends in the treatment with beta-blocker and the effect on outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Ela Giladi, Ilya Losin, Ziad Arow, Ranin Hilu, Oded Sabah, Rami Barashi, Alexander Omelchenko, Yoav Arnson, Abid Assali, David Pereg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early beta-blocker treatment has long been recommended for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is reduced; however, whether beta-blocker therapy improves outcomes in patients with AMI receiving contemporary treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends in the effect of beta-blocker therapy on outcomes of patients with AMI in a large, nationwide cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AMI enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes Israeli Survey from 2000 to 2021 were included. They were categorized into three periods: early (2000-2004), mid (2006-2016), and late (2018-2021). Each period group was further divided into two subgroups based on LVEF (>40 and ≤40%) and then stratified by beta-blocker treatment status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 11 569 patients. Among patients with LVEF less than 40%, beta-blocker treatment was associated with improved 1-year survival rates in the early (9.1 vs. 20.4%; P < 0.001) and mid (10 vs. 20.6%; P < 0.001) periods only. Among patients with LVEF greater than or equal to 40%, beta-blocker treatment was linked to enhanced 1-year survival in patients enrolled in the early period (3.4 vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001), but not in the mid and late periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association between beta-blocker treatment and improved survival in patients with AMI has diminished over recent decades, regardless of LVEF. These findings are likely attributed to the advancements in contemporary medical and revascularization therapy. As such, our results may challenge current recommendations regarding beta-blocker therapy in AMI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001568\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:长期以来,急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者推荐早期β受体阻滞剂治疗,特别是当左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低时;然而,受体阻滞剂治疗是否能改善AMI患者接受当代治疗的预后仍不确定。本研究旨在调查β受体阻滞剂治疗对急性心肌梗死患者预后影响的时间趋势。方法:纳入2000年至2021年急性冠脉综合征以色列调查的AMI患者。它们被分为三个时期:早期(2000-2004年)、中期(2006-2016年)和晚期(2018-2021年)。每个周期组根据LVEF(>40和≤40%)进一步分为2个亚组,再根据受体阻滞剂治疗情况分层。结果:该队列包括11 569例患者。在LVEF小于40%的患者中,β受体阻滞剂治疗仅在早期(9.1比20.4%,P < 0.001)和中期(10比20.6%,P < 0.001)与1年生存率的提高相关。在LVEF大于或等于40%的患者中,β受体阻滞剂治疗与早期入组患者1年生存率的提高有关(3.4 vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001),但在中晚期没有。结论:近几十年来,无论LVEF如何,β受体阻滞剂治疗与AMI患者生存率改善之间的相关性已经减弱。这些发现可能归因于当代医学和血运重建治疗的进步。因此,我们的结果可能会挑战目前关于AMI β受体阻滞剂治疗的建议。
Temporal trends in the treatment with beta-blocker and the effect on outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Background: Early beta-blocker treatment has long been recommended for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is reduced; however, whether beta-blocker therapy improves outcomes in patients with AMI receiving contemporary treatment remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate temporal trends in the effect of beta-blocker therapy on outcomes of patients with AMI in a large, nationwide cohort.
Methods: Patients with AMI enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes Israeli Survey from 2000 to 2021 were included. They were categorized into three periods: early (2000-2004), mid (2006-2016), and late (2018-2021). Each period group was further divided into two subgroups based on LVEF (>40 and ≤40%) and then stratified by beta-blocker treatment status.
Results: The cohort consisted of 11 569 patients. Among patients with LVEF less than 40%, beta-blocker treatment was associated with improved 1-year survival rates in the early (9.1 vs. 20.4%; P < 0.001) and mid (10 vs. 20.6%; P < 0.001) periods only. Among patients with LVEF greater than or equal to 40%, beta-blocker treatment was linked to enhanced 1-year survival in patients enrolled in the early period (3.4 vs. 7.6%; P < 0.001), but not in the mid and late periods.
Conclusion: The association between beta-blocker treatment and improved survival in patients with AMI has diminished over recent decades, regardless of LVEF. These findings are likely attributed to the advancements in contemporary medical and revascularization therapy. As such, our results may challenge current recommendations regarding beta-blocker therapy in AMI.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.