欧洲麻疹疫情的教训:加强队列研究,以防备未来的大流行。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Alessandro Visentin, Alessandra Nazeri, José Luis Peñalvo, Anna Gorska, Ruth Joanna Davis, Rosanna Louise Flett, Victoria Charlotte Simensen, Nina Langeland, Quentin Gaday, Massimo Mirandola, Valentina Mazzotta, Liem Binh Luong Nguyen, Beatriz Mothe, Christophe Van Dijck, Andreas Meyerhans, Christoph Boesecke, Carlo Giaquinto, Ali Judd, Evelina Tacconelli
{"title":"欧洲麻疹疫情的教训:加强队列研究,以防备未来的大流行。","authors":"Alessandro Visentin, Alessandra Nazeri, José Luis Peñalvo, Anna Gorska, Ruth Joanna Davis, Rosanna Louise Flett, Victoria Charlotte Simensen, Nina Langeland, Quentin Gaday, Massimo Mirandola, Valentina Mazzotta, Liem Binh Luong Nguyen, Beatriz Mothe, Christophe Van Dijck, Andreas Meyerhans, Christoph Boesecke, Carlo Giaquinto, Ali Judd, Evelina Tacconelli","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Well-designed cohort studies are crucial for pandemic preparedness, informing evidence-based infection prevention and treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following the 2022 mpox outbreak in Europe, this scoping review critically evaluates the design, implementation, and characteristics of cohort studies focusing on mpox. The aim is to inform recommendations for the Cohort Coordination Board and the COordination MEchanism for Cohorts and Trials (CoMeCT) to enhance cohort study research and improve preparedness.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) metadata repository up to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Forty-nine cohorts were identified, encompassing 10 728 individuals with primary or breakthrough mpox and 34 010 individuals without mpox (vaccinated and unvaccinated). The majority of cohorts collected data prospectively (30, 63%) and were multicentre (25, 52%). The primary aims were the natural history of mpox (31, 65%); effectiveness of vaccination (15, 31%); and treatment (2, 4%). The most frequent target population was individuals at increased risk of sexually transmitted infection (18, 38%). Follow-up of participants varied widely among cohorts. Significant data heterogeneity, stemming from the inconsistent use of standardized data dictionaries, impeded data sharing and meta-analyses. Under-representation of vulnerable populations and limited biobanking further compounded these challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This review underscores critical gaps in the research response during the mpox outbreak. Based on these findings, we propose the following recommendations: (1) establishing and maintaining \"ever-warm\" cohorts of high-risk individuals during inter-epidemic periods to enable rapid data collection during future outbreaks; (2) promoting data interoperability through the development and adoption of standardized data collection tools and ontologies; (3) improving the quality of study reporting through strict adherence to relevant guidelines; and (4) strengthening European and global coordination through the establishment of collaborative research networks. Sustained investment in research infrastructure is essential for a more effective, equitable, and timely public health response to future outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from the European mpox outbreak: strengthening cohort research for future pandemic preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Visentin, Alessandra Nazeri, José Luis Peñalvo, Anna Gorska, Ruth Joanna Davis, Rosanna Louise Flett, Victoria Charlotte Simensen, Nina Langeland, Quentin Gaday, Massimo Mirandola, Valentina Mazzotta, Liem Binh Luong Nguyen, Beatriz Mothe, Christophe Van Dijck, Andreas Meyerhans, Christoph Boesecke, Carlo Giaquinto, Ali Judd, Evelina Tacconelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Well-designed cohort studies are crucial for pandemic preparedness, informing evidence-based infection prevention and treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following the 2022 mpox outbreak in Europe, this scoping review critically evaluates the design, implementation, and characteristics of cohort studies focusing on mpox. The aim is to inform recommendations for the Cohort Coordination Board and the COordination MEchanism for Cohorts and Trials (CoMeCT) to enhance cohort study research and improve preparedness.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) metadata repository up to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Forty-nine cohorts were identified, encompassing 10 728 individuals with primary or breakthrough mpox and 34 010 individuals without mpox (vaccinated and unvaccinated). The majority of cohorts collected data prospectively (30, 63%) and were multicentre (25, 52%). The primary aims were the natural history of mpox (31, 65%); effectiveness of vaccination (15, 31%); and treatment (2, 4%). The most frequent target population was individuals at increased risk of sexually transmitted infection (18, 38%). Follow-up of participants varied widely among cohorts. Significant data heterogeneity, stemming from the inconsistent use of standardized data dictionaries, impeded data sharing and meta-analyses. Under-representation of vulnerable populations and limited biobanking further compounded these challenges.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This review underscores critical gaps in the research response during the mpox outbreak. Based on these findings, we propose the following recommendations: (1) establishing and maintaining \\\"ever-warm\\\" cohorts of high-risk individuals during inter-epidemic periods to enable rapid data collection during future outbreaks; (2) promoting data interoperability through the development and adoption of standardized data collection tools and ontologies; (3) improving the quality of study reporting through strict adherence to relevant guidelines; and (4) strengthening European and global coordination through the establishment of collaborative research networks. Sustained investment in research infrastructure is essential for a more effective, equitable, and timely public health response to future outbreaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.08.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:设计良好的队列研究对于为基于证据的感染预防和治疗策略提供信息至关重要。目的:继2022年欧洲m痘暴发后,本范围综述严格评估了以m痘为重点的队列研究的设计、实施和特征。其目的是为队列协调委员会和CoMeCT提供建议,以加强队列研究和改进准备工作。来源:在PubMed、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov、EU临床试验注册和ECRIN元数据存储库中进行了全面的文献检索,截止到2024年12月。内容:确定了49个队列,包括10,728例原发性或突破性m痘患者和34,010例非m痘患者(接种疫苗和未接种疫苗)。大多数队列是前瞻性收集数据(30.63%),并且是多中心的(25.52%)。主要目的是m痘的自然史(31.65%);疫苗接种的有效性(15.31%);治疗(2.4%)。最常见的目标人群是性传播感染风险增加的个体(18.38%)。参与者的随访在不同的队列中差异很大。由于标准化数据字典的使用不一致,显著的数据异质性阻碍了数据共享和元分析。弱势群体的代表性不足和有限的生物库进一步加剧了这些挑战。意义:本综述强调了在麻疹暴发期间研究应对方面的重大空白。根据这些发现,我们提出以下建议:(1)在疫情间期建立和维持“永远温暖”的高危人群队列,以便在未来疫情期间快速收集数据;(2)通过开发和采用标准化的数据收集工具和本体,促进数据互操作性;(3)严格遵守相关准则,提高研究报告质量;(4)通过建立合作研究网络加强欧洲和全球的协调。对研究基础设施的持续投资对于对未来疫情作出更有效、公平和及时的公共卫生反应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons from the European mpox outbreak: strengthening cohort research for future pandemic preparedness.

Background: Well-designed cohort studies are crucial for pandemic preparedness, informing evidence-based infection prevention and treatment strategies.

Objectives: Following the 2022 mpox outbreak in Europe, this scoping review critically evaluates the design, implementation, and characteristics of cohort studies focusing on mpox. The aim is to inform recommendations for the Cohort Coordination Board and the COordination MEchanism for Cohorts and Trials (CoMeCT) to enhance cohort study research and improve preparedness.

Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Union Clinical Trials Register, and the European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) metadata repository up to December 2024.

Content: Forty-nine cohorts were identified, encompassing 10 728 individuals with primary or breakthrough mpox and 34 010 individuals without mpox (vaccinated and unvaccinated). The majority of cohorts collected data prospectively (30, 63%) and were multicentre (25, 52%). The primary aims were the natural history of mpox (31, 65%); effectiveness of vaccination (15, 31%); and treatment (2, 4%). The most frequent target population was individuals at increased risk of sexually transmitted infection (18, 38%). Follow-up of participants varied widely among cohorts. Significant data heterogeneity, stemming from the inconsistent use of standardized data dictionaries, impeded data sharing and meta-analyses. Under-representation of vulnerable populations and limited biobanking further compounded these challenges.

Implications: This review underscores critical gaps in the research response during the mpox outbreak. Based on these findings, we propose the following recommendations: (1) establishing and maintaining "ever-warm" cohorts of high-risk individuals during inter-epidemic periods to enable rapid data collection during future outbreaks; (2) promoting data interoperability through the development and adoption of standardized data collection tools and ontologies; (3) improving the quality of study reporting through strict adherence to relevant guidelines; and (4) strengthening European and global coordination through the establishment of collaborative research networks. Sustained investment in research infrastructure is essential for a more effective, equitable, and timely public health response to future outbreaks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信