下一代测序提高了牙源性脓肿的病原体鉴定,这是否会影响临床结果?

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Felix Benjamin Warwas, Felix Thol, Martin A Sieber, Nikolai Spuck, Franz-Josef Kramer, Nils Heim
{"title":"下一代测序提高了牙源性脓肿的病原体鉴定,这是否会影响临床结果?","authors":"Felix Benjamin Warwas, Felix Thol, Martin A Sieber, Nikolai Spuck, Franz-Josef Kramer, Nils Heim","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06504-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of gene-based bioinformatic analysis via next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared to conventional culture and microscopy in identifying microorganisms and antibiotic resistances in odontogenic abscesses. Additionally, the influence of selected clinical indicators including prior antibiotic therapy, in-hospital antibiotic treatment, and detection of antibiotic resistance on length of stay (LOS) was analysed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In patients undergoing extraoral incision and drainage of odontogenic abscesses at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, two microbiological swabs (NGS and conventional) were taken intraoperatively from each patient. Microbial profiles and resistance patterns were assessed and correlated with clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacteria were identified in 100% of NGS swabs compared to 68.1% in conventional swabs (p < 0.001). NGS detected a median of 8 bacterial genera per sample versus 1 via conventional methods, primarily due to superior detection of anaerobes (median 7 vs. 0). Both methods equally identified aerobic genera (median 1 each). Fungal organisms and antibiotic resistances were also more frequently detected using NGS (p < 0.001). Prior antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced LOS (p = 0.030). Neither the type of in-hospital antibiotic regimen nor the presence of resistance influenced LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NGS substantially enhances the detection of polymicrobial communities, including anaerobes and fungi, and identifies antibiotic resistances more effectively than conventional diagnostics in odontogenic abscesses.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>NGS offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen profiling and resistance testing, supporting quick establishment of tailored antimicrobial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 9","pages":"430"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Felix Benjamin Warwas, Felix Thol, Martin A Sieber, Nikolai Spuck, Franz-Josef Kramer, Nils Heim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06504-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of gene-based bioinformatic analysis via next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared to conventional culture and microscopy in identifying microorganisms and antibiotic resistances in odontogenic abscesses. Additionally, the influence of selected clinical indicators including prior antibiotic therapy, in-hospital antibiotic treatment, and detection of antibiotic resistance on length of stay (LOS) was analysed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In patients undergoing extraoral incision and drainage of odontogenic abscesses at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, two microbiological swabs (NGS and conventional) were taken intraoperatively from each patient. Microbial profiles and resistance patterns were assessed and correlated with clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bacteria were identified in 100% of NGS swabs compared to 68.1% in conventional swabs (p < 0.001). NGS detected a median of 8 bacterial genera per sample versus 1 via conventional methods, primarily due to superior detection of anaerobes (median 7 vs. 0). Both methods equally identified aerobic genera (median 1 each). Fungal organisms and antibiotic resistances were also more frequently detected using NGS (p < 0.001). Prior antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced LOS (p = 0.030). Neither the type of in-hospital antibiotic regimen nor the presence of resistance influenced LOS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NGS substantially enhances the detection of polymicrobial communities, including anaerobes and fungi, and identifies antibiotic resistances more effectively than conventional diagnostics in odontogenic abscesses.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>NGS offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen profiling and resistance testing, supporting quick establishment of tailored antimicrobial therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06504-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06504-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估下一代测序(NGS)基因生物信息学分析在鉴别牙源性脓肿微生物和抗生素耐药性方面的诊断性能,并与传统培养和显微镜相比较。此外,还分析了选定的临床指标,包括既往抗生素治疗、住院抗生素治疗和抗生素耐药性检测对住院时间(LOS)的影响。材料和方法:在波恩大学医院口腔颌面整形外科行口外切开引流牙源性脓肿的患者,术中取2个微生物拭子(NGS和常规)。评估微生物谱和耐药模式,并与临床数据相关联。结果:NGS拭子的细菌检出率为100%,而常规拭子的细菌检出率为68.1% (p)。结论:NGS大大提高了厌氧菌和真菌等多微生物群落的检出率,并且在牙源性脓肿中比常规诊断更有效地识别抗生素耐药性。临床意义:NGS提供快速、全面的病原体分析和耐药性检测,支持快速建立量身定制的抗菌药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?

Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?

Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?

Next-generation sequencing improves pathogen identification in odontogenic abscesses, could this affect clinical outcomes?

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of gene-based bioinformatic analysis via next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared to conventional culture and microscopy in identifying microorganisms and antibiotic resistances in odontogenic abscesses. Additionally, the influence of selected clinical indicators including prior antibiotic therapy, in-hospital antibiotic treatment, and detection of antibiotic resistance on length of stay (LOS) was analysed.

Materials and methods: In patients undergoing extraoral incision and drainage of odontogenic abscesses at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, two microbiological swabs (NGS and conventional) were taken intraoperatively from each patient. Microbial profiles and resistance patterns were assessed and correlated with clinical data.

Results: Bacteria were identified in 100% of NGS swabs compared to 68.1% in conventional swabs (p < 0.001). NGS detected a median of 8 bacterial genera per sample versus 1 via conventional methods, primarily due to superior detection of anaerobes (median 7 vs. 0). Both methods equally identified aerobic genera (median 1 each). Fungal organisms and antibiotic resistances were also more frequently detected using NGS (p < 0.001). Prior antibiotic therapy was associated with a significantly reduced LOS (p = 0.030). Neither the type of in-hospital antibiotic regimen nor the presence of resistance influenced LOS.

Conclusions: NGS substantially enhances the detection of polymicrobial communities, including anaerobes and fungi, and identifies antibiotic resistances more effectively than conventional diagnostics in odontogenic abscesses.

Clinical relevance: NGS offers rapid, comprehensive pathogen profiling and resistance testing, supporting quick establishment of tailored antimicrobial therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信