Alberto Barchi, C Prakash Gyawali, John Pandolfino, Gwen M C Masclee, Niek Warringa, Edoardo Vespa, Edoardo V Savarino, Renato Salvador, Sabine Roman, Dustin A Carlson, Rena Yadlapati, Albert J Bredenoord
{"title":"治疗后贲门失弛缓症的高分辨率测压:范围回顾和新命名。","authors":"Alberto Barchi, C Prakash Gyawali, John Pandolfino, Gwen M C Masclee, Niek Warringa, Edoardo Vespa, Edoardo V Savarino, Renato Salvador, Sabine Roman, Dustin A Carlson, Rena Yadlapati, Albert J Bredenoord","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Chicago Classification (CC) for high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the standard for diagnostic criteria of primary motility disorders, achalasia being the most relevant. CC does not include recommendations on HRM in treated achalasia, either after surgery or endoscopic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After systematic review of literature on 3 major databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from inception to December 2024, a group of 12 esophageal motility experts provided recommendations for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and proposed novel nomenclature and management flowchart to address gaps in diagnostic CC hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 40 articles on HRM in treated achalasia. Unsuccessful achalasia treatment results in high-integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and obstructive features especially on provocative maneuvers. We propose the term treated achalasia with outflow obstruction (TAOO) instead of achalasia. Conversely, the term adequately treated achalasia (ATA) is suggested in the absence of obstructive features, instead of absent contractility or ineffective motility, which could be misleading. We propose an IRP cutoff of the upper limit of normal according HRM system utilized, similar to that recommended for the naïve sphincter by CC to describe incomplete sphincter relaxation despite treatment. Intrabolus pressurization and abnormal IRP on rapid drink challenge (RDC) are additional obstructive features. Assessment of body contractility, either ineffective (<450 mmHg.cm.s) or spastic (<4.5 sec), is relevant to disease profiling. HRM combined with impedance represents a valuable tool to assess esophageal emptying.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review with expert recommendations provides guidance for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and introduces novel descriptive terms to describe pathophysiology following achalasia treatment. Conventional CC should not be used in treated achalasia description.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-resolution Manometry in Treated Achalasia: Scoping Review and Novel Nomenclature.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Barchi, C Prakash Gyawali, John Pandolfino, Gwen M C Masclee, Niek Warringa, Edoardo Vespa, Edoardo V Savarino, Renato Salvador, Sabine Roman, Dustin A Carlson, Rena Yadlapati, Albert J Bredenoord\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2025.08.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Chicago Classification (CC) for high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the standard for diagnostic criteria of primary motility disorders, achalasia being the most relevant. CC does not include recommendations on HRM in treated achalasia, either after surgery or endoscopic interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After systematic review of literature on 3 major databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from inception to December 2024, a group of 12 esophageal motility experts provided recommendations for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and proposed novel nomenclature and management flowchart to address gaps in diagnostic CC hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 40 articles on HRM in treated achalasia. Unsuccessful achalasia treatment results in high-integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and obstructive features especially on provocative maneuvers. We propose the term treated achalasia with outflow obstruction (TAOO) instead of achalasia. Conversely, the term adequately treated achalasia (ATA) is suggested in the absence of obstructive features, instead of absent contractility or ineffective motility, which could be misleading. We propose an IRP cutoff of the upper limit of normal according HRM system utilized, similar to that recommended for the naïve sphincter by CC to describe incomplete sphincter relaxation despite treatment. Intrabolus pressurization and abnormal IRP on rapid drink challenge (RDC) are additional obstructive features. Assessment of body contractility, either ineffective (<450 mmHg.cm.s) or spastic (<4.5 sec), is relevant to disease profiling. HRM combined with impedance represents a valuable tool to assess esophageal emptying.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review with expert recommendations provides guidance for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and introduces novel descriptive terms to describe pathophysiology following achalasia treatment. Conventional CC should not be used in treated achalasia description.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.08.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.08.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高分辨率测压(HRM)的芝加哥分类(CC)是原发性运动障碍的诊断标准,贲门失弛缓症是最相关的。CC不包括在手术或内镜干预后治疗贲门失弛缓症的HRM建议。材料和方法:在对3个主要数据库(Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science)从成立到2024年12月的文献进行系统回顾后,一个由12名食管运动专家组成的小组为治疗后贲门失弛弛症的HRM解释提供了建议,并提出了新的命名法和管理流程,以解决诊断CC层次结构的差距。结果:检索到40篇关于人力资源管理治疗贲门失弛缓症的文章。不成功的失弛缓症治疗导致高整合松弛压力(IRP)和梗阻性特征,特别是在挑衅操作。我们建议用“治疗性失弛缓症伴流出梗阻”(TAOO)来代替“失弛缓症”。相反,适当治疗的贲门失弛缓症(ATA)一词被认为是没有梗阻性特征,而不是没有收缩力或运动能力低下,这可能会产生误导。我们提出了一个IRP截止点,即所使用的正常人力资源管理系统的上限,类似于CC对naïve括约肌的推荐,以描述治疗后括约肌不完全松弛。快速饮水挑战(RDC)时的肠内加压和IRP异常是另外的梗阻特征。结论:这篇专家建议的范围综述为贲门失弛缓症治疗后的HRM解释提供了指导,并引入了新的描述性术语来描述贲门失弛缓症治疗后的病理生理。常规CC不应用于治疗后的失弛缓症描述。
High-resolution Manometry in Treated Achalasia: Scoping Review and Novel Nomenclature.
Background & aims: Chicago Classification (CC) for high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the standard for diagnostic criteria of primary motility disorders, achalasia being the most relevant. CC does not include recommendations on HRM in treated achalasia, either after surgery or endoscopic interventions.
Methods: After systematic review of literature on 3 major databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from inception to December 2024, a group of 12 esophageal motility experts provided recommendations for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and proposed novel nomenclature and management flowchart to address gaps in diagnostic CC hierarchy.
Results: The search yielded 40 articles on HRM in treated achalasia. Unsuccessful achalasia treatment results in high-integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) and obstructive features especially on provocative maneuvers. We propose the term treated achalasia with outflow obstruction (TAOO) instead of achalasia. Conversely, the term adequately treated achalasia (ATA) is suggested in the absence of obstructive features, instead of absent contractility or ineffective motility, which could be misleading. We propose an IRP cutoff of the upper limit of normal according HRM system utilized, similar to that recommended for the naïve sphincter by CC to describe incomplete sphincter relaxation despite treatment. Intrabolus pressurization and abnormal IRP on rapid drink challenge (RDC) are additional obstructive features. Assessment of body contractility, either ineffective (<450 mmHg.cm.s) or spastic (<4.5 sec), is relevant to disease profiling. HRM combined with impedance represents a valuable tool to assess esophageal emptying.
Conclusions: This scoping review with expert recommendations provides guidance for HRM interpretation in treated achalasia and introduces novel descriptive terms to describe pathophysiology following achalasia treatment. Conventional CC should not be used in treated achalasia description.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion.
As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.