从心脏损伤到组学特征:脓毒性心肌病生物标志物的叙述性回顾。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Matteo Guarino, Francesco Luppi, Giacomo Maroncelli, Paolo Baldin, Anna Costanzini, Martina Maritati, Carlo Contini, Biagio Sassone, Roberto De Giorgio, Michele Domenico Spampinato
{"title":"从心脏损伤到组学特征:脓毒性心肌病生物标志物的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Matteo Guarino, Francesco Luppi, Giacomo Maroncelli, Paolo Baldin, Anna Costanzini, Martina Maritati, Carlo Contini, Biagio Sassone, Roberto De Giorgio, Michele Domenico Spampinato","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01842-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) is a frequent and underdiagnosed complication of sepsis that contributes significantly to patient morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology involves myocardial inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and microcirculatory abnormalities. Despite growing recognition, the diagnostic approach to SCM remains inconsistent, and validated biomarkers are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review explores the current landscape of SCM biomarkers. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional biomarkers are useful, but nonspecific in the septic context. Emerging biomarkers offer promising diagnostic and prognostic information, particularly in combination. Multi-omics strategies revealed transcriptomic and proteomic profiles to be potentially specific for SCM and may facilitate early detection and risk stratification. However, limitations remain in terms of standardization, assay reproducibility, and clinical translation. Composite biomarker panels and longitudinal monitoring appear to be more informative than single-point measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCM remains a diagnostic challenge, although biomarker research is rapidly evolving. Integrating traditional and emerging biomarkers, supported by multi-omics and computational tools, may enable a shift toward precision medicine in sepsis-related cardiac dysfunction. Future efforts should focus on consensus definitions, validation in prospective cohorts, and biomarker-guided interventions to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Guarino, Francesco Luppi, Giacomo Maroncelli, Paolo Baldin, Anna Costanzini, Martina Maritati, Carlo Contini, Biagio Sassone, Roberto De Giorgio, Michele Domenico Spampinato\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10238-025-01842-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) is a frequent and underdiagnosed complication of sepsis that contributes significantly to patient morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology involves myocardial inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and microcirculatory abnormalities. Despite growing recognition, the diagnostic approach to SCM remains inconsistent, and validated biomarkers are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review explores the current landscape of SCM biomarkers. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception to June 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Traditional biomarkers are useful, but nonspecific in the septic context. Emerging biomarkers offer promising diagnostic and prognostic information, particularly in combination. Multi-omics strategies revealed transcriptomic and proteomic profiles to be potentially specific for SCM and may facilitate early detection and risk stratification. However, limitations remain in terms of standardization, assay reproducibility, and clinical translation. Composite biomarker panels and longitudinal monitoring appear to be more informative than single-point measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SCM remains a diagnostic challenge, although biomarker research is rapidly evolving. Integrating traditional and emerging biomarkers, supported by multi-omics and computational tools, may enable a shift toward precision medicine in sepsis-related cardiac dysfunction. Future efforts should focus on consensus definitions, validation in prospective cohorts, and biomarker-guided interventions to improve patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01842-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01842-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒性心肌病(SCM)是脓毒症的一种常见且未被诊断的并发症,对患者的发病率和死亡率有重要影响。其病理生理包括心肌炎症、线粒体功能障碍和微循环异常。尽管越来越多的人认识到,SCM的诊断方法仍然不一致,并且缺乏有效的生物标志物。方法:本文综述了SCM生物标志物的现状。PubMed, Scopus和EMBASE从创建到2025年6月进行了检索。结果:传统的生物标志物是有用的,但在脓毒性背景下非特异性。新兴的生物标志物提供了有希望的诊断和预后信息,特别是结合使用。多组学策略显示,转录组学和蛋白质组学特征对SCM具有潜在的特异性,可能有助于早期发现和风险分层。然而,在标准化、分析可重复性和临床翻译方面仍然存在局限性。复合生物标志物面板和纵向监测似乎比单点测量更能提供信息。结论:尽管生物标志物研究正在迅速发展,但SCM仍然是一个诊断挑战。在多组学和计算工具的支持下,整合传统和新兴的生物标志物,可能会使败血症相关心功能障碍的精准医学转向。未来的努力应集中在共识定义、前瞻性队列验证和生物标志物引导的干预措施上,以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.

From cardiac injury to omics signatures: a narrative review on biomarkers in septic cardiomyopathy.

Background: Septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) is a frequent and underdiagnosed complication of sepsis that contributes significantly to patient morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology involves myocardial inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and microcirculatory abnormalities. Despite growing recognition, the diagnostic approach to SCM remains inconsistent, and validated biomarkers are lacking.

Methods: This narrative review explores the current landscape of SCM biomarkers. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception to June 2025.

Results: Traditional biomarkers are useful, but nonspecific in the septic context. Emerging biomarkers offer promising diagnostic and prognostic information, particularly in combination. Multi-omics strategies revealed transcriptomic and proteomic profiles to be potentially specific for SCM and may facilitate early detection and risk stratification. However, limitations remain in terms of standardization, assay reproducibility, and clinical translation. Composite biomarker panels and longitudinal monitoring appear to be more informative than single-point measurements.

Conclusions: SCM remains a diagnostic challenge, although biomarker research is rapidly evolving. Integrating traditional and emerging biomarkers, supported by multi-omics and computational tools, may enable a shift toward precision medicine in sepsis-related cardiac dysfunction. Future efforts should focus on consensus definitions, validation in prospective cohorts, and biomarker-guided interventions to improve patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信