电穿孔治疗胰腺导管腺癌,临床前和临床研究的系统综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gabriel Marcellier, Theo Le Berre, Paul Rivallin, Marie Frenea-Robin, Frédéric Prat
{"title":"电穿孔治疗胰腺导管腺癌,临床前和临床研究的系统综述。","authors":"Gabriel Marcellier, Theo Le Berre, Paul Rivallin, Marie Frenea-Robin, Frédéric Prat","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Electroporation-based therapies, such as electrochemotherapy (ECT) and irreversible electroporation (IRE), could be promising alternatives. ECT combines reversible electroporation with chemotherapy, enhancing intracellular drug uptake, while IRE leads to nonthermal tumor ablation. Both have been suggested as immunotherapy potentiators (electroimmunotherapy) in some tumor locations. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ECT, IRE, and immunoelectroporation in PDAC treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Google-Scholar for ECT, IRE, and electroimmunotherapy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. For ECT and electroimmunotherapy, regarding the scarcity of the data, we described independently each study protocol and results. For IRE, we collected protocol, efficiency, and safety data to provide a global analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies described the effects of ECT for PDAC treatment: Safety and efficiency were promising in both preclinical and human models. Thirty-eight clinical studies including 2,245 patients were analyzed for IRE, with patients mostly treated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and a median overall survival of 17.2 months at the expanse of a 36% adverse event rate, half of which severe. Seven (preclinical and clinical) studies investigated electroimmunotherapy suggesting significant potentiation of immunotherapy in both preclinical and human models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the largest systematic review to date regarding electroporation in PDAC treatment, analysis of study results plead against the use of IRE but highlight the potential benefits of ECT and electroimmunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroporation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Marcellier, Theo Le Berre, Paul Rivallin, Marie Frenea-Robin, Frédéric Prat\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Electroporation-based therapies, such as electrochemotherapy (ECT) and irreversible electroporation (IRE), could be promising alternatives. ECT combines reversible electroporation with chemotherapy, enhancing intracellular drug uptake, while IRE leads to nonthermal tumor ablation. Both have been suggested as immunotherapy potentiators (electroimmunotherapy) in some tumor locations. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ECT, IRE, and immunoelectroporation in PDAC treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Google-Scholar for ECT, IRE, and electroimmunotherapy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. For ECT and electroimmunotherapy, regarding the scarcity of the data, we described independently each study protocol and results. For IRE, we collected protocol, efficiency, and safety data to provide a global analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies described the effects of ECT for PDAC treatment: Safety and efficiency were promising in both preclinical and human models. Thirty-eight clinical studies including 2,245 patients were analyzed for IRE, with patients mostly treated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and a median overall survival of 17.2 months at the expanse of a 36% adverse event rate, half of which severe. Seven (preclinical and clinical) studies investigated electroimmunotherapy suggesting significant potentiation of immunotherapy in both preclinical and human models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the largest systematic review to date regarding electroporation in PDAC treatment, analysis of study results plead against the use of IRE but highlight the potential benefits of ECT and electroimmunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000911\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰腺导管腺癌(Pancreatic ductal adencarcinoma, PDAC)是一种高度侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,预后差,治疗方案有限。以电穿孔为基础的治疗,如电化疗(ECT)和不可逆电穿孔(IRE)可能是有希望的替代方案。ECT结合可逆电穿孔和化疗,增强细胞内药物摄取,而IRE则导致非热肿瘤消融。两者都被认为是某些肿瘤部位的免疫治疗增强剂(电免疫治疗)。我们对ECT、IRE和免疫电穿孔治疗PDAC的有效性和安全性进行了系统评价。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南,在Medline、Embase、Cochrane和Google-Scholar上检索ECT、IRE和电免疫治疗。对于ECT和电免疫治疗,考虑到数据的稀缺性,我们独立描述了每个研究方案和结果。对于IRE,我们收集了协议、效率和安全性数据,以提供全局分析。结果:15项研究描述了ECT治疗PDAC的效果:在临床前和人体模型中,安全性和有效性都很有希望。38项临床研究包括2245例患者对IRE进行了分析,其中大多数患者接受LAPC治疗,中位总生存期为17.2个月,不良事件发生率为36%,其中一半为严重不良事件。7项(临床前和临床)研究调查了电免疫治疗,表明免疫治疗在临床前和人体模型中都有显著的增强作用。结论:在迄今为止关于PDAC治疗中电穿孔的最大系统综述中,对研究结果的分析反对使用IRE,但强调ECT和电免疫治疗的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electroporation for the Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Electroporation-based therapies, such as electrochemotherapy (ECT) and irreversible electroporation (IRE), could be promising alternatives. ECT combines reversible electroporation with chemotherapy, enhancing intracellular drug uptake, while IRE leads to nonthermal tumor ablation. Both have been suggested as immunotherapy potentiators (electroimmunotherapy) in some tumor locations. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficiency and safety of ECT, IRE, and immunoelectroporation in PDAC treatment.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Google-Scholar for ECT, IRE, and electroimmunotherapy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. For ECT and electroimmunotherapy, regarding the scarcity of the data, we described independently each study protocol and results. For IRE, we collected protocol, efficiency, and safety data to provide a global analysis.

Results: Fifteen studies described the effects of ECT for PDAC treatment: Safety and efficiency were promising in both preclinical and human models. Thirty-eight clinical studies including 2,245 patients were analyzed for IRE, with patients mostly treated for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and a median overall survival of 17.2 months at the expanse of a 36% adverse event rate, half of which severe. Seven (preclinical and clinical) studies investigated electroimmunotherapy suggesting significant potentiation of immunotherapy in both preclinical and human models.

Discussion: In the largest systematic review to date regarding electroporation in PDAC treatment, analysis of study results plead against the use of IRE but highlight the potential benefits of ECT and electroimmunotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信