预测机器学习模型在ICU急慢性肝衰竭和两个或两个以上器官衰竭患者中的应用。

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yee Hui Yeo, Mengyi Zhang, Martin S McCoy, Jian Zu, Yingli He, Yi Liu, Juan Li, Taotao Yan, Yuan Wang, Hirsh D Trivedi, Ju Dong Yang, Vinay Sundaram, Xiaodan Sun, Zhujun Cao, Chun-Ying Wu, Jonel Trebicka, Fanpu Ji
{"title":"预测机器学习模型在ICU急慢性肝衰竭和两个或两个以上器官衰竭患者中的应用。","authors":"Yee Hui Yeo, Mengyi Zhang, Martin S McCoy, Jian Zu, Yingli He, Yi Liu, Juan Li, Taotao Yan, Yuan Wang, Hirsh D Trivedi, Ju Dong Yang, Vinay Sundaram, Xiaodan Sun, Zhujun Cao, Chun-Ying Wu, Jonel Trebicka, Fanpu Ji","doi":"10.3350/cmh.2025.0573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (AUC of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-to-use online tool was created to predict mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":10275,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Machine Learning Model in ICU Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Two or More Organ Failures.\",\"authors\":\"Yee Hui Yeo, Mengyi Zhang, Martin S McCoy, Jian Zu, Yingli He, Yi Liu, Juan Li, Taotao Yan, Yuan Wang, Hirsh D Trivedi, Ju Dong Yang, Vinay Sundaram, Xiaodan Sun, Zhujun Cao, Chun-Ying Wu, Jonel Trebicka, Fanpu Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.3350/cmh.2025.0573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (AUC of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-to-use online tool was created to predict mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.0573\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.0573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对入住重症监护病房(ICU)的急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的短期死亡率进行预测可以提高对其的有效管理。方法:开发、解释和验证ACLF合并两个或两个以上器官衰竭(OFs)患者短期死亡率的预测机器学习(ML)模型。利用具有详细临床信息的大型ICU队列,我们根据EASL-CLIF和NACSELD的定义确定了有两个或两个以上OFs的ACLF患者。为每个定义建立ML模型来预测30天死亡率。Shapley值是用来解释这些模型的。对这些模型进行了验证和校正。结果:5994例入住ICU的肝硬化患者中,1511例符合NACSELD标准,1692例符合EASL-CLIF II级或更高标准。CatBoost ACLF (CBA)模型在NACSELD队列中准确率最高(AUC为0.87),而Random Forest ACLF (RFA)模型在EASL-CLIF队列中准确率最高(AUC为0.83)。两种模型均具有鲁棒性。通过SHAP评分分析对模型进行解释,得出一个排名表,并选出排名前12位的预测因子。两种简化模型表现出相似的性能(CBA模型:AUC 0.89, RFA模型:AUC 0.81),显著优于当代评分系统,包括CLIF-C ACLF和MELD 3.0。模型在内部和外部队列中都得到了验证。创建了一个简单易用的在线工具来预测死亡率。结论:我们提出了可解释的、经过良好验证的、校准的预测模型,用于有两个或更多OFs的ACLF患者,其预测评分优于现有的预测评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Machine Learning Model in ICU Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Two or More Organ Failures.

Background: Prediction of short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) may enhance effective management.

Methods: To develop, explain, and validate a predictive machine learning (ML) model for short-term mortality in patients with ACLF with two or more organ failures (OFs). Utilizing a large ICU cohort with detailed clinical information, we identified ACLF patients with two or more OFs according to the EASL-CLIF and NACSELD definitions. ML model was developed for each definition to predict 30-day mortality. The Shapley value was estimated to explain the models. Validation and calibration of these models were performed.

Results: Of 5994 patients with cirrhosis admitted to ICU, 1511 met NACSELD criteria, and 1692 met EASL-CLIF grade II or higher criteria. The CatBoost ACLF (CBA) model had the greatest accuracy in the NACSELD cohort (AUC of 0.87), while the Random Forest ACLF (RFA) model performed best in the EASL-CLIF cohort (AUC of 0.83). Both models showed robust calibration. The models were explained by SHAP score analysis, yielding a rank list, and the top twelve predictors were selected. Both simplified models demonstrated similar performance (CBA model: AUC 0.89, RFA model: AUC 0.81) and significantly outperformed contemporary scoring systems, including CLIF-C ACLF and MELD 3.0. The models were validated in both internal and external cohorts. A simple-to-use online tool was created to predict mortality rates.

Conclusions: We presented explainable, well-validated, and calibrated predictive models for ACLF patients with two or more OFs, which outperformed existing predictive scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Hepatology is an internationally recognized, peer-reviewed, open-access journal published quarterly in English. Its mission is to disseminate cutting-edge knowledge, trends, and insights into hepatobiliary diseases, fostering an inclusive academic platform for robust debate and discussion among clinical practitioners, translational researchers, and basic scientists. With a multidisciplinary approach, the journal strives to enhance public health, particularly in the resource-limited Asia-Pacific region, which faces significant challenges such as high prevalence of B viral infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, Clinical and Molecular Hepatology prioritizes epidemiological studies of hepatobiliary diseases across diverse regions including East Asia, North Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, Southwest Asia, Pacific, Africa, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, Central America, and South America. The journal publishes a wide range of content, including original research papers, meta-analyses, letters to the editor, case reports, reviews, guidelines, editorials, and liver images and pathology, encompassing all facets of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信