个体社会经济剥夺对血液透析护理和患者行为的影响:一项多中心法国研究(Precadia)。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf201
Yves Dimitrov, François Chantrel, Thierry Krummel, Clotilde Muller, Emmanuelle Charlin, Alexandre Klein, Thierry Hannedouche
{"title":"个体社会经济剥夺对血液透析护理和患者行为的影响:一项多中心法国研究(Precadia)。","authors":"Yves Dimitrov, François Chantrel, Thierry Krummel, Clotilde Muller, Emmanuelle Charlin, Alexandre Klein, Thierry Hannedouche","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of morbidity and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. However, most prior studies have relied on area-level socioeconomic indicators and have been conducted outside of Europe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether individual-level socioeconomic status, measured using the EPICES score, influences healthcare quality and patient behaviors in adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in northeastern France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter observational study was conducted across five dialysis units. Adult patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis for ≥3 months were enrolled. The EPICES score was used to assess individual SED, and patients were stratified into deprived (P+) and non-deprived (P-) groups based on the median score. Clinical, biochemical, and behavioral variables were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 patients were included (mean age 68.5 years; 60% male). The median EPICES score was 33.1 (mean 35.8 ± 18.9). Compared with P - patients, P + patients had a significantly longer dialysis vintage (76.3 vs. 73.9 months, <i>p</i> = .002), higher normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR; 1.28 vs. 1.06 g/kg/day, <i>p</i> = .007), higher CRP concentrations (14.3 ± 4.1 vs. 9.56 ± 0.8 mg/L, <i>p</i> < .02 ), and greater smoking prevalence (34% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> = .004). No significant differences were observed in albumin and hemoglobin levels, erythropoietin (EPO) dosing, or the frequency of missed dialysis sessions. The CRP × P + interaction on nPCR was significant, suggesting that systemic inflammation could modify the association between deprivation and protein catabolism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual-level SED was associated with differences in health behaviors but not in the quality of physician-driven dialysis care. These findings challenge the notion that deprived patients inherently receive lower-quality clinical care and emphasize the need for targeted strategies that address patient-dependent behavioral factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 8","pages":"sfaf201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of individual socioeconomic deprivation on hemodialysis care and patient behavior: a multicenter French study (Precadia).\",\"authors\":\"Yves Dimitrov, François Chantrel, Thierry Krummel, Clotilde Muller, Emmanuelle Charlin, Alexandre Klein, Thierry Hannedouche\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ckj/sfaf201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of morbidity and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. However, most prior studies have relied on area-level socioeconomic indicators and have been conducted outside of Europe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether individual-level socioeconomic status, measured using the EPICES score, influences healthcare quality and patient behaviors in adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in northeastern France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter observational study was conducted across five dialysis units. Adult patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis for ≥3 months were enrolled. The EPICES score was used to assess individual SED, and patients were stratified into deprived (P+) and non-deprived (P-) groups based on the median score. Clinical, biochemical, and behavioral variables were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 patients were included (mean age 68.5 years; 60% male). The median EPICES score was 33.1 (mean 35.8 ± 18.9). Compared with P - patients, P + patients had a significantly longer dialysis vintage (76.3 vs. 73.9 months, <i>p</i> = .002), higher normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR; 1.28 vs. 1.06 g/kg/day, <i>p</i> = .007), higher CRP concentrations (14.3 ± 4.1 vs. 9.56 ± 0.8 mg/L, <i>p</i> < .02 ), and greater smoking prevalence (34% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> = .004). No significant differences were observed in albumin and hemoglobin levels, erythropoietin (EPO) dosing, or the frequency of missed dialysis sessions. The CRP × P + interaction on nPCR was significant, suggesting that systemic inflammation could modify the association between deprivation and protein catabolism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual-level SED was associated with differences in health behaviors but not in the quality of physician-driven dialysis care. These findings challenge the notion that deprived patients inherently receive lower-quality clinical care and emphasize the need for targeted strategies that address patient-dependent behavioral factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"sfaf201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Kidney Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社会经济剥夺(SED)越来越被认为是血液透析患者发病率和死亡率的关键决定因素。然而,大多数先前的研究都依赖于区域一级的社会经济指标,并在欧洲以外进行。目的:评估使用EPICES评分测量的个人水平的社会经济地位是否影响法国东北部接受维持性血液透析的成人的医疗质量和患者行为。方法:这项多中心观察性研究在五个透析单位进行。接受血液透析≥3个月的终末期肾脏疾病成年患者被纳入研究。EPICES评分用于评估个体SED,并根据中位评分将患者分为剥夺(P+)组和非剥夺(P-)组。比较两组患者的临床、生化和行为指标。结果:共纳入401例患者,平均年龄68.5岁,男性占60%。EPICES评分中位数为33.1分(平均35.8±18.9分)。与P -患者相比,P +患者的透析时间明显更长(76.3个月vs 73.9个月,P = 0.002),正常化蛋白分解代谢率更高(nPCR; 1.28 vs 1.06 g/kg/天,P = 0.007), CRP浓度更高(14.3±4.1 vs 9.56±0.8 mg/L, P = 0.004)。在白蛋白和血红蛋白水平、促红细胞生成素(EPO)剂量或错过透析次数方面没有观察到显著差异。CRP × P +对nPCR的相互作用是显著的,表明全身性炎症可以改变剥夺与蛋白质分解代谢之间的关系。结论:个体水平的SED与健康行为差异有关,但与医生驱动的透析护理质量无关。这些发现挑战了被剥夺的患者本质上接受低质量临床护理的观念,并强调需要有针对性的策略来解决患者依赖的行为因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of individual socioeconomic deprivation on hemodialysis care and patient behavior: a multicenter French study (Precadia).

Impact of individual socioeconomic deprivation on hemodialysis care and patient behavior: a multicenter French study (Precadia).

Impact of individual socioeconomic deprivation on hemodialysis care and patient behavior: a multicenter French study (Precadia).

Background: Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of morbidity and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. However, most prior studies have relied on area-level socioeconomic indicators and have been conducted outside of Europe.

Objective: To assess whether individual-level socioeconomic status, measured using the EPICES score, influences healthcare quality and patient behaviors in adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in northeastern France.

Methods: This multicenter observational study was conducted across five dialysis units. Adult patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis for ≥3 months were enrolled. The EPICES score was used to assess individual SED, and patients were stratified into deprived (P+) and non-deprived (P-) groups based on the median score. Clinical, biochemical, and behavioral variables were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 401 patients were included (mean age 68.5 years; 60% male). The median EPICES score was 33.1 (mean 35.8 ± 18.9). Compared with P - patients, P + patients had a significantly longer dialysis vintage (76.3 vs. 73.9 months, p = .002), higher normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR; 1.28 vs. 1.06 g/kg/day, p = .007), higher CRP concentrations (14.3 ± 4.1 vs. 9.56 ± 0.8 mg/L, p < .02 ), and greater smoking prevalence (34% vs. 15%, p = .004). No significant differences were observed in albumin and hemoglobin levels, erythropoietin (EPO) dosing, or the frequency of missed dialysis sessions. The CRP × P + interaction on nPCR was significant, suggesting that systemic inflammation could modify the association between deprivation and protein catabolism.

Conclusion: Individual-level SED was associated with differences in health behaviors but not in the quality of physician-driven dialysis care. These findings challenge the notion that deprived patients inherently receive lower-quality clinical care and emphasize the need for targeted strategies that address patient-dependent behavioral factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信