胆汁酸组成与合成途径的关系及贝扎布特治疗胆汁淤积性肝病的疗效。

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Manami Iida, Atsuko Higashida, Shuichi Ohtomo, Akihito Takeuchi, Ryo Miura, Yoshinari Asaoka, Naoshi Horiba, Akira Honda, Atsushi Tanaka
{"title":"胆汁酸组成与合成途径的关系及贝扎布特治疗胆汁淤积性肝病的疗效。","authors":"Manami Iida, Atsuko Higashida, Shuichi Ohtomo, Akihito Takeuchi, Ryo Miura, Yoshinari Asaoka, Naoshi Horiba, Akira Honda, Atsushi Tanaka","doi":"10.3350/cmh.2025.0575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Bezafibrate (BZF), a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor/pregnane X receptor agonist, has demonstrated efficacy in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Although one of the therapeutic effects of BZF is suppression of bile acid synthesis, its specific impact on bile acid synthesis pathways has not been thoroughly explored. This study investigated bile acid profiles, synthesis intermediates, and their associations with liver biochemistries in patients with PBC and PSC, and evaluated the impact of BZF treatment on these associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 30 patients with PBC, 10 with PSC, and 30 control subjects. We measured total bile acids, bile acid components, plasma levels of 7α-hydroxycholesterol (7α-OH-C), 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OH-C) to assess the classic and alternative bile acid synthesis pathways and analyzed the association with liver biochemistries with and without BZF treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total bile acid levels were elevated in PBC and PSC compared to controls, correlating significantly with liver biochemistries. BZF treatment significantly suppressed the classic pathway, as evidenced by reduced 7α-OH-C and C4 levels. However, 27-OH-C levels, possibly reflecting the alternative pathway activity, were not reduced in those with elevated liver biochemistries despite BZF treatment, suggesting incomplete suppression of alternative pathway in patients with suboptimal BZF response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that while BZF effectively suppresses the classic pathway, alternative pathway activity may compromise its therapeutic efficacy in treatment-resistant cases, highlighting the need for novel therapies inhibiting the alternative pathway in patients with inadequate response to BZF.</p>","PeriodicalId":10275,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of bile acid composition with synthetic pathways and efficacy of bezafibrate in cholestatic liver disease.\",\"authors\":\"Manami Iida, Atsuko Higashida, Shuichi Ohtomo, Akihito Takeuchi, Ryo Miura, Yoshinari Asaoka, Naoshi Horiba, Akira Honda, Atsushi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.3350/cmh.2025.0575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Bezafibrate (BZF), a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor/pregnane X receptor agonist, has demonstrated efficacy in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Although one of the therapeutic effects of BZF is suppression of bile acid synthesis, its specific impact on bile acid synthesis pathways has not been thoroughly explored. This study investigated bile acid profiles, synthesis intermediates, and their associations with liver biochemistries in patients with PBC and PSC, and evaluated the impact of BZF treatment on these associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 30 patients with PBC, 10 with PSC, and 30 control subjects. We measured total bile acids, bile acid components, plasma levels of 7α-hydroxycholesterol (7α-OH-C), 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OH-C) to assess the classic and alternative bile acid synthesis pathways and analyzed the association with liver biochemistries with and without BZF treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total bile acid levels were elevated in PBC and PSC compared to controls, correlating significantly with liver biochemistries. BZF treatment significantly suppressed the classic pathway, as evidenced by reduced 7α-OH-C and C4 levels. However, 27-OH-C levels, possibly reflecting the alternative pathway activity, were not reduced in those with elevated liver biochemistries despite BZF treatment, suggesting incomplete suppression of alternative pathway in patients with suboptimal BZF response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that while BZF effectively suppresses the classic pathway, alternative pathway activity may compromise its therapeutic efficacy in treatment-resistant cases, highlighting the need for novel therapies inhibiting the alternative pathway in patients with inadequate response to BZF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.0575\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.0575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:Bezafibrate (BZF)是一种双过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体/孕烷X受体激动剂,已证明与熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)联合治疗原发性胆道炎(PBC)和原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)有效。虽然BZF的治疗作用之一是抑制胆汁酸合成,但其对胆汁酸合成途径的具体影响尚未被深入探讨。本研究调查了胆汁酸谱、合成中间体及其与PBC和PSC患者肝脏生化的关联,并评估了BZF治疗对这些关联的影响。方法:我们招募了30例PBC患者,10例PSC患者和30例对照组。我们测量了总胆汁酸、胆汁酸成分、7α-羟基胆固醇(7α-OH-C)、7α-羟基-4-胆固醇-3- 1 (C4)和27-羟基胆固醇(27-OH-C)的血浆水平,以评估经典和替代胆汁酸合成途径,并分析了BZF治疗前后肝脏生化的关系。结果:与对照组相比,PBC和PSC的总胆汁酸水平升高,与肝脏生物化学显著相关。BZF处理显著抑制了经典途径,降低了7α-OH-C和C4水平。然而,27-OH-C水平可能反映了替代途径的活性,在肝生化升高的患者中,尽管BZF治疗,27-OH-C水平并没有降低,这表明在BZF反应不佳的患者中,替代途径受到不完全抑制。结论:这些发现表明,虽然BZF有效抑制经典途径,但替代途径的活性可能会影响其在治疗耐药病例中的治疗效果,强调需要新的疗法来抑制BZF反应不足的患者的替代途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of bile acid composition with synthetic pathways and efficacy of bezafibrate in cholestatic liver disease.

Background & aims: Bezafibrate (BZF), a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor/pregnane X receptor agonist, has demonstrated efficacy in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Although one of the therapeutic effects of BZF is suppression of bile acid synthesis, its specific impact on bile acid synthesis pathways has not been thoroughly explored. This study investigated bile acid profiles, synthesis intermediates, and their associations with liver biochemistries in patients with PBC and PSC, and evaluated the impact of BZF treatment on these associations.

Methods: We enrolled 30 patients with PBC, 10 with PSC, and 30 control subjects. We measured total bile acids, bile acid components, plasma levels of 7α-hydroxycholesterol (7α-OH-C), 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OH-C) to assess the classic and alternative bile acid synthesis pathways and analyzed the association with liver biochemistries with and without BZF treatment.

Results: Total bile acid levels were elevated in PBC and PSC compared to controls, correlating significantly with liver biochemistries. BZF treatment significantly suppressed the classic pathway, as evidenced by reduced 7α-OH-C and C4 levels. However, 27-OH-C levels, possibly reflecting the alternative pathway activity, were not reduced in those with elevated liver biochemistries despite BZF treatment, suggesting incomplete suppression of alternative pathway in patients with suboptimal BZF response.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that while BZF effectively suppresses the classic pathway, alternative pathway activity may compromise its therapeutic efficacy in treatment-resistant cases, highlighting the need for novel therapies inhibiting the alternative pathway in patients with inadequate response to BZF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Hepatology is an internationally recognized, peer-reviewed, open-access journal published quarterly in English. Its mission is to disseminate cutting-edge knowledge, trends, and insights into hepatobiliary diseases, fostering an inclusive academic platform for robust debate and discussion among clinical practitioners, translational researchers, and basic scientists. With a multidisciplinary approach, the journal strives to enhance public health, particularly in the resource-limited Asia-Pacific region, which faces significant challenges such as high prevalence of B viral infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, Clinical and Molecular Hepatology prioritizes epidemiological studies of hepatobiliary diseases across diverse regions including East Asia, North Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, Southwest Asia, Pacific, Africa, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, Central America, and South America. The journal publishes a wide range of content, including original research papers, meta-analyses, letters to the editor, case reports, reviews, guidelines, editorials, and liver images and pathology, encompassing all facets of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信