一种新型自制腹腔镜及腹腔镜摄像机导航模型的内容与面效度的初步研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Chirurgia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3164
Kayaththery Varathan, Adele Zacken, Havil Stephen Alexander, Tharaga Kirupakaran, Mustafa Albayati, Uzair Khan, Sanjeevi Bharadwaj
{"title":"一种新型自制腹腔镜及腹腔镜摄像机导航模型的内容与面效度的初步研究。","authors":"Kayaththery Varathan, Adele Zacken, Havil Stephen Alexander, Tharaga Kirupakaran, Mustafa Albayati, Uzair Khan, Sanjeevi Bharadwaj","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> With being introduced just over a century ago, laparoscopic surgery has become more popular than open. Although a steep learning curve is associated, a plethora of simulators, assessments and courses are available to master laparoscopic skills. However, despite a surgeon's expertise, it can be limited by the camera handler. Very little camera navigation training is provided. The aim of this study is to validate a homemade 0 and 30 deg; laparoscope and laparoscopic camera navigation models. <b>Methods:</b> Homemade laparoscope and various camera navigation models were created. 18 participants with no previous camera handling experience or training were recruited. A brief introduction was provided on the study purpose and tasks. They performed 3 tasks on the 0 deg; laparoscope and model (camera navigation, in line orientation and opposite line orientation) and 30 laparoscope and model (camera navigation). Participants were then asked to answer face-content validation questionnaires for both the laparoscopes and models. <b>Results:</b> The cost of the 0 deg; laparoscope came to 25 pounds and the 30 deg; laparoscope was 20 pounds. In the face and content validity questionnaire, the lowest average score of 7.5 was achieved for how realistic it seemed. Of the models designed for camera navigation, model 5 was used with 0 deg; and model 7 was used with 30 deg;. From the questionnaire, the lowest average score of 6.9 was achieved for how realistic the models seemed. For the 0 deg; camera navigation task, the group average of both attempts was 267 seconds. As expected, in line orientation (61 seconds) was completed quicker than opposite line (151 seconds). For 30 deg; camera navigation, the group average time taken was 134 seconds. Conclusion and future recommendations: The homemade laparoscope has proven to be inexpensive and from the exercises carried out by the participants, it is evident the models are effective. The laparoscopic models came to 2760 poubds. Improvements can be made to make them more effective and inexpensive. Subjective assessments should be looked into to see if they can be made objective. It will be interesting to assess participants again after 3-6 months. A follow up study with more participants would be recommended and also a constructive validity with novices, intermediates and experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 Ahead of print","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and Face Validity of a Novel Homemade Laparoscope and Laparoscopic Camera Navigation Model: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kayaththery Varathan, Adele Zacken, Havil Stephen Alexander, Tharaga Kirupakaran, Mustafa Albayati, Uzair Khan, Sanjeevi Bharadwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.3164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> With being introduced just over a century ago, laparoscopic surgery has become more popular than open. Although a steep learning curve is associated, a plethora of simulators, assessments and courses are available to master laparoscopic skills. However, despite a surgeon's expertise, it can be limited by the camera handler. Very little camera navigation training is provided. The aim of this study is to validate a homemade 0 and 30 deg; laparoscope and laparoscopic camera navigation models. <b>Methods:</b> Homemade laparoscope and various camera navigation models were created. 18 participants with no previous camera handling experience or training were recruited. A brief introduction was provided on the study purpose and tasks. They performed 3 tasks on the 0 deg; laparoscope and model (camera navigation, in line orientation and opposite line orientation) and 30 laparoscope and model (camera navigation). Participants were then asked to answer face-content validation questionnaires for both the laparoscopes and models. <b>Results:</b> The cost of the 0 deg; laparoscope came to 25 pounds and the 30 deg; laparoscope was 20 pounds. In the face and content validity questionnaire, the lowest average score of 7.5 was achieved for how realistic it seemed. Of the models designed for camera navigation, model 5 was used with 0 deg; and model 7 was used with 30 deg;. From the questionnaire, the lowest average score of 6.9 was achieved for how realistic the models seemed. For the 0 deg; camera navigation task, the group average of both attempts was 267 seconds. As expected, in line orientation (61 seconds) was completed quicker than opposite line (151 seconds). For 30 deg; camera navigation, the group average time taken was 134 seconds. Conclusion and future recommendations: The homemade laparoscope has proven to be inexpensive and from the exercises carried out by the participants, it is evident the models are effective. The laparoscopic models came to 2760 poubds. Improvements can be made to make them more effective and inexpensive. Subjective assessments should be looked into to see if they can be made objective. It will be interesting to assess participants again after 3-6 months. A follow up study with more participants would be recommended and also a constructive validity with novices, intermediates and experts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"120 Ahead of print\",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:一个多世纪前,腹腔镜手术被引入,比开放手术更受欢迎。虽然一个陡峭的学习曲线是相关的,大量的模拟器,评估和课程可以掌握腹腔镜技能。然而,尽管外科医生的专业知识,它可能会受到相机处理程序的限制。很少提供相机导航培训。本研究的目的是验证自制的0和30度;腹腔镜和腹腔镜相机导航模型。方法:自制腹腔镜及多种摄像机导航模型。18名之前没有相机操作经验或培训的参与者被招募。简要介绍了本次研究的目的和任务。他们在0度上做了3个任务;腹腔镜和模型(摄像机导航、直线方向和反直线方向)和30腹腔镜和模型(摄像机导航)。然后,参与者被要求回答腹腔镜和模型的面部内容验证问卷。结果:成本为0度;腹腔镜是25磅,30度;腹腔镜重20磅。在脸效度和内容效度问卷中,最低的平均得分是7.5分,因为它看起来很真实。在相机导航设计的模型中,模型5采用0°;7型用30度;从调查问卷来看,最低的平均分是6.9分,因为模型看起来是真实的。对于0度;相机导航任务,这组人两次尝试的平均时间是267秒。不出所料,排队(61秒)比排队(151秒)完成得快。对于30度;摄像机导航,组内平均拍摄时间为134秒。结论及今后建议:自制腹腔镜已被证明是廉价的,并且从参与者的练习中可以看出模型是有效的。腹腔镜下的模型重达2760磅。可以进行改进,使它们更有效,更便宜。主观评价要加以研究,看能否客观化。3-6个月后再次评估参与者将会很有趣。建议进行更多参与者的后续研究,并对新手,中级和专家进行建设性效度研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content and Face Validity of a Novel Homemade Laparoscope and Laparoscopic Camera Navigation Model: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: With being introduced just over a century ago, laparoscopic surgery has become more popular than open. Although a steep learning curve is associated, a plethora of simulators, assessments and courses are available to master laparoscopic skills. However, despite a surgeon's expertise, it can be limited by the camera handler. Very little camera navigation training is provided. The aim of this study is to validate a homemade 0 and 30 deg; laparoscope and laparoscopic camera navigation models. Methods: Homemade laparoscope and various camera navigation models were created. 18 participants with no previous camera handling experience or training were recruited. A brief introduction was provided on the study purpose and tasks. They performed 3 tasks on the 0 deg; laparoscope and model (camera navigation, in line orientation and opposite line orientation) and 30 laparoscope and model (camera navigation). Participants were then asked to answer face-content validation questionnaires for both the laparoscopes and models. Results: The cost of the 0 deg; laparoscope came to 25 pounds and the 30 deg; laparoscope was 20 pounds. In the face and content validity questionnaire, the lowest average score of 7.5 was achieved for how realistic it seemed. Of the models designed for camera navigation, model 5 was used with 0 deg; and model 7 was used with 30 deg;. From the questionnaire, the lowest average score of 6.9 was achieved for how realistic the models seemed. For the 0 deg; camera navigation task, the group average of both attempts was 267 seconds. As expected, in line orientation (61 seconds) was completed quicker than opposite line (151 seconds). For 30 deg; camera navigation, the group average time taken was 134 seconds. Conclusion and future recommendations: The homemade laparoscope has proven to be inexpensive and from the exercises carried out by the participants, it is evident the models are effective. The laparoscopic models came to 2760 poubds. Improvements can be made to make them more effective and inexpensive. Subjective assessments should be looked into to see if they can be made objective. It will be interesting to assess participants again after 3-6 months. A follow up study with more participants would be recommended and also a constructive validity with novices, intermediates and experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信