丛集性头痛中药物过度使用和药物过度使用的探讨。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1177/03331024251364241
Nunu Lund, Marie-Louise Kulas Søborg, Louise Ninett Carlsen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anja Sofie Petersen
{"title":"丛集性头痛中药物过度使用和药物过度使用的探讨。","authors":"Nunu Lund, Marie-Louise Kulas Søborg, Louise Ninett Carlsen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anja Sofie Petersen","doi":"10.1177/03331024251364241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIt is not well established to what extent medication-overuse occurs in cluster headache (CH), if medication-overuse headache exists in CH and whether the existing criteria for medication-overuse headache are a suitable diagnostic tool in CH. We aimed to examine the prevalence of medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache in a well characterized cohort of people with CH and describe associated factors and clinical impact.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with CH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) beta and ICHD-3 were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview investigating medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache according to ICHD-3. To add nuance to the debate, we also included a more conservative definition, applying the ICHD-3 criteria for the medication-overuse but specified the headache phenotype to a daily bilateral headache.ResultsIn total, 21% of 433 participants with CH had a medication-overuse according to ICHD-3. Of these, 16% fulfilled the criteria for probable medication-overuse headache according to the ICHD-3, and 12% if excluding isolated triptan overuse. The overused analgesics constituted simple analgesics (52.2%), triptans (37.3%), opioids (29.9%) and combination therapies (20.9%). Associated factors were having chronic CH (odds ratio = 11.4, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and comorbid migraine (odds ratio = 2.35, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Participants with probable medication-overuse headache had longer attack duration (30.0 vs. 20.0 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and less effect of acute and preventive medication than those without (20.0 vs. 55.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.05 and 13.3 vs. 37.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively). If applying the conservative definition with a daily bilateral headache along with a medication-overuse, the prevalence was reduced to 4%.ConclusionsProbable medication-overuse headache was present in every sixth participant with CH in this large cross-sectional cohort study. Interestingly, only a smaller proportion was the result of isolated triptan overuse. In CH, where patients often suffer from daily attacks and may suffer from a daily bilateral inter-ictal pain, our very conservative definition noted a prevalence of 4%. While the existing ICHD-3 criteria for medication-overuse headache may not be directly applicable in CH, the applicability and validity of the very conservative definition warrant further investigation. Still, as in other cross-sectional populations with medication-overuse, we noted an association that acute and preventive treatments were less effective in participants with probable medication-overuse headache compared to those without. Altogether, future prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact extent and presentation of medication-overuse headache in CH and determine whether it is an aggravating factor for the disease. We do not recommend discontinuing triptans if suspecting MOH due to ethical concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 8","pages":"3331024251364241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring medication-overuse and medication-overuse headache in cluster headache.\",\"authors\":\"Nunu Lund, Marie-Louise Kulas Søborg, Louise Ninett Carlsen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Anja Sofie Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024251364241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIt is not well established to what extent medication-overuse occurs in cluster headache (CH), if medication-overuse headache exists in CH and whether the existing criteria for medication-overuse headache are a suitable diagnostic tool in CH. We aimed to examine the prevalence of medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache in a well characterized cohort of people with CH and describe associated factors and clinical impact.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with CH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) beta and ICHD-3 were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview investigating medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache according to ICHD-3. To add nuance to the debate, we also included a more conservative definition, applying the ICHD-3 criteria for the medication-overuse but specified the headache phenotype to a daily bilateral headache.ResultsIn total, 21% of 433 participants with CH had a medication-overuse according to ICHD-3. Of these, 16% fulfilled the criteria for probable medication-overuse headache according to the ICHD-3, and 12% if excluding isolated triptan overuse. The overused analgesics constituted simple analgesics (52.2%), triptans (37.3%), opioids (29.9%) and combination therapies (20.9%). Associated factors were having chronic CH (odds ratio = 11.4, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and comorbid migraine (odds ratio = 2.35, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Participants with probable medication-overuse headache had longer attack duration (30.0 vs. 20.0 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and less effect of acute and preventive medication than those without (20.0 vs. 55.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.05 and 13.3 vs. 37.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively). If applying the conservative definition with a daily bilateral headache along with a medication-overuse, the prevalence was reduced to 4%.ConclusionsProbable medication-overuse headache was present in every sixth participant with CH in this large cross-sectional cohort study. Interestingly, only a smaller proportion was the result of isolated triptan overuse. In CH, where patients often suffer from daily attacks and may suffer from a daily bilateral inter-ictal pain, our very conservative definition noted a prevalence of 4%. While the existing ICHD-3 criteria for medication-overuse headache may not be directly applicable in CH, the applicability and validity of the very conservative definition warrant further investigation. Still, as in other cross-sectional populations with medication-overuse, we noted an association that acute and preventive treatments were less effective in participants with probable medication-overuse headache compared to those without. Altogether, future prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact extent and presentation of medication-overuse headache in CH and determine whether it is an aggravating factor for the disease. We do not recommend discontinuing triptans if suspecting MOH due to ethical concerns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"3331024251364241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251364241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251364241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚丛集性头痛(CH)中药物过度使用的程度,是否存在药物过度使用头痛,以及现有的药物过度使用头痛标准是否适用于CH的诊断工具。我们的目的是在一个特征明确的CH患者队列中检查药物过度使用和可能的药物过度使用头痛的患病率,并描述相关因素和临床影响。方法邀请根据国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3) beta版和ICHD-3诊断为CH的受试者,根据ICHD-3进行半结构化访谈,调查药物过度使用和可能的药物过度使用头痛。为了增加争论的细微差别,我们还纳入了一个更保守的定义,应用ICHD-3药物过度使用标准,但将头痛表型指定为每日双侧头痛。结果根据ICHD-3, 433名CH患者中有21%存在药物过度使用。根据ICHD-3,其中16%符合可能的药物过度使用头痛标准,如果排除孤立的曲坦类药物过度使用,则为12%。滥用的镇痛药包括单纯镇痛药(52.2%)、曲坦类药物(37.3%)、阿片类药物(29.9%)和联合用药(20.9%)。相关因素为慢性CH(优势比= 11.4,p p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring medication-overuse and medication-overuse headache in cluster headache.

BackgroundIt is not well established to what extent medication-overuse occurs in cluster headache (CH), if medication-overuse headache exists in CH and whether the existing criteria for medication-overuse headache are a suitable diagnostic tool in CH. We aimed to examine the prevalence of medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache in a well characterized cohort of people with CH and describe associated factors and clinical impact.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with CH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) beta and ICHD-3 were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview investigating medication-overuse and probable medication-overuse headache according to ICHD-3. To add nuance to the debate, we also included a more conservative definition, applying the ICHD-3 criteria for the medication-overuse but specified the headache phenotype to a daily bilateral headache.ResultsIn total, 21% of 433 participants with CH had a medication-overuse according to ICHD-3. Of these, 16% fulfilled the criteria for probable medication-overuse headache according to the ICHD-3, and 12% if excluding isolated triptan overuse. The overused analgesics constituted simple analgesics (52.2%), triptans (37.3%), opioids (29.9%) and combination therapies (20.9%). Associated factors were having chronic CH (odds ratio = 11.4, p < 0.00001) and comorbid migraine (odds ratio = 2.35, p < 0.05). Participants with probable medication-overuse headache had longer attack duration (30.0 vs. 20.0 minutes, p < 0.01) and less effect of acute and preventive medication than those without (20.0 vs. 55.9%, p < 0.05 and 13.3 vs. 37.3%, p < 0.01, respectively). If applying the conservative definition with a daily bilateral headache along with a medication-overuse, the prevalence was reduced to 4%.ConclusionsProbable medication-overuse headache was present in every sixth participant with CH in this large cross-sectional cohort study. Interestingly, only a smaller proportion was the result of isolated triptan overuse. In CH, where patients often suffer from daily attacks and may suffer from a daily bilateral inter-ictal pain, our very conservative definition noted a prevalence of 4%. While the existing ICHD-3 criteria for medication-overuse headache may not be directly applicable in CH, the applicability and validity of the very conservative definition warrant further investigation. Still, as in other cross-sectional populations with medication-overuse, we noted an association that acute and preventive treatments were less effective in participants with probable medication-overuse headache compared to those without. Altogether, future prospective studies are necessary to establish the exact extent and presentation of medication-overuse headache in CH and determine whether it is an aggravating factor for the disease. We do not recommend discontinuing triptans if suspecting MOH due to ethical concerns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信