青少年焦虑症分步治疗与分层治疗:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Elin Olsson, Per Andrén, Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson, Kajsa Dellgran, Oscar Cardona Castro, Annika Möttus, David Mataix-Cols, Sabina Gušić, Sean Perrin, Eva Serlachius, Matti Cervin
{"title":"青少年焦虑症分步治疗与分层治疗:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Elin Olsson, Per Andrén, Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson, Kajsa Dellgran, Oscar Cardona Castro, Annika Möttus, David Mataix-Cols, Sabina Gušić, Sean Perrin, Eva Serlachius, Matti Cervin","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01908-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, but access to evidence-based treatment is limited. Most clinical guidelines recommend stratified care, where less complex patients are offered low intensity interventions and complex patients more intensive options. Stepped care, where all patients initially receive low-intensity treatment, has gained traction due to its potential cost-effectiveness. Research on care models for youth with anxiety disorders is very limited. In this pre-registered (NCT06016907) pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), we examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth with anxiety disorders. In stepped care, all began with internet-delivered CBT. In stratified care, complex cases (based on a baseline risk score incorporating symptom severity, co-existing disorders, functional impairment, and family conflict) started with in-person CBT. Non-responders in both groups were offered in-person CBT. Over six months, 51 youth with anxiety disorders were enrolled (mean age = 14.18 years, range = 9.25-17.50; 71% girls), with 80% meeting criteria for more than one mental disorder. Treatment adherence (≥ 50% completion) was 78-84% across interventions. Masked outcome assessments were attended by 96% of participants. No serious adverse effects were reported. At the primary endpoint, 40% of participants in stepped care and 75% in stratified care were classified as treatment responders. However, the trial was not powered to detect efficacy differences, and no between-group comparisons were conducted. Results indicate that a definitive trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth anxiety disorders is feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stepped Care Versus Stratified Care for Youth with Anxiety Disorders: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elin Olsson, Per Andrén, Emma Claesdotter-Knutsson, Kajsa Dellgran, Oscar Cardona Castro, Annika Möttus, David Mataix-Cols, Sabina Gušić, Sean Perrin, Eva Serlachius, Matti Cervin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10578-025-01908-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, but access to evidence-based treatment is limited. Most clinical guidelines recommend stratified care, where less complex patients are offered low intensity interventions and complex patients more intensive options. Stepped care, where all patients initially receive low-intensity treatment, has gained traction due to its potential cost-effectiveness. Research on care models for youth with anxiety disorders is very limited. In this pre-registered (NCT06016907) pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), we examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth with anxiety disorders. In stepped care, all began with internet-delivered CBT. In stratified care, complex cases (based on a baseline risk score incorporating symptom severity, co-existing disorders, functional impairment, and family conflict) started with in-person CBT. Non-responders in both groups were offered in-person CBT. Over six months, 51 youth with anxiety disorders were enrolled (mean age = 14.18 years, range = 9.25-17.50; 71% girls), with 80% meeting criteria for more than one mental disorder. Treatment adherence (≥ 50% completion) was 78-84% across interventions. Masked outcome assessments were attended by 96% of participants. No serious adverse effects were reported. At the primary endpoint, 40% of participants in stepped care and 75% in stratified care were classified as treatment responders. However, the trial was not powered to detect efficacy differences, and no between-group comparisons were conducted. Results indicate that a definitive trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth anxiety disorders is feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Psychiatry & Human Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Psychiatry & Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01908-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01908-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑症在儿童和青少年中很常见,但获得循证治疗的机会有限。大多数临床指南推荐分层护理,为病情较轻的患者提供低强度干预,为病情较复杂的患者提供更密集的选择。阶梯式护理,即所有患者最初接受低强度治疗,由于其潜在的成本效益而受到关注。对青少年焦虑症护理模式的研究非常有限。在这项预注册(NCT06016907)的先导随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们检验了一项比较青少年焦虑症阶梯式和分层式护理的可行性、可接受性和安全性。在分步护理中,所有人都从互联网提供的认知行为治疗开始。在分层护理中,复杂病例(基于包含症状严重程度、共存障碍、功能损害和家庭冲突的基线风险评分)从面对面的CBT开始。两组无应答者均接受了面对面的CBT治疗。在6个月的时间里,51名患有焦虑症的青少年被纳入研究(平均年龄= 14.18岁,范围= 9.25-17.50;71%为女孩),其中80%符合一种以上精神障碍的标准。所有干预措施的治疗依从性(≥50%完成率)为78-84%。96%的参与者参加了隐性结果评估。没有严重的不良反应报告。在主要终点,40%的阶梯式治疗参与者和75%的分层治疗参与者被归类为治疗应答者。然而,该试验没有检测到疗效差异,也没有进行组间比较。结果表明,一个明确的试验比较梯级和分层护理青年焦虑症是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stepped Care Versus Stratified Care for Youth with Anxiety Disorders: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, but access to evidence-based treatment is limited. Most clinical guidelines recommend stratified care, where less complex patients are offered low intensity interventions and complex patients more intensive options. Stepped care, where all patients initially receive low-intensity treatment, has gained traction due to its potential cost-effectiveness. Research on care models for youth with anxiety disorders is very limited. In this pre-registered (NCT06016907) pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), we examined the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth with anxiety disorders. In stepped care, all began with internet-delivered CBT. In stratified care, complex cases (based on a baseline risk score incorporating symptom severity, co-existing disorders, functional impairment, and family conflict) started with in-person CBT. Non-responders in both groups were offered in-person CBT. Over six months, 51 youth with anxiety disorders were enrolled (mean age = 14.18 years, range = 9.25-17.50; 71% girls), with 80% meeting criteria for more than one mental disorder. Treatment adherence (≥ 50% completion) was 78-84% across interventions. Masked outcome assessments were attended by 96% of participants. No serious adverse effects were reported. At the primary endpoint, 40% of participants in stepped care and 75% in stratified care were classified as treatment responders. However, the trial was not powered to detect efficacy differences, and no between-group comparisons were conducted. Results indicate that a definitive trial comparing stepped and stratified care for youth anxiety disorders is feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Child Psychiatry & Human Development is an interdisciplinary international journal serving the groups represented by child and adolescent psychiatry, clinical child/pediatric/family psychology, pediatrics, social science, and human development. The journal publishes research on diagnosis, assessment, treatment, epidemiology, development, advocacy, training, cultural factors, ethics, policy, and professional issues as related to clinical disorders in children, adolescents, and families. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original empirical research in addition to substantive and theoretical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信