对有牙周炎病史的患者进行后牙狭窄直径种植体的长期评价:一项平均随访11.5年的回顾性研究。

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maria Costanza Soldini, Isabel Arroyo, Riccardo Peragine, Enrique Roldán, Cristina Valles, Ramón Pons
{"title":"对有牙周炎病史的患者进行后牙狭窄直径种植体的长期评价:一项平均随访11.5年的回顾性研究。","authors":"Maria Costanza Soldini, Isabel Arroyo, Riccardo Peragine, Enrique Roldán, Cristina Valles, Ramón Pons","doi":"10.1111/clr.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the factors influencing the survival and success rates of narrow diameter implants (NDIs) placed in the posterior area; additionally, the study evaluated marginal bone changes, along with biological and prosthetic complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 227 NDIs placed in the premolar and molar regions of 119 patients. The analysis focused on implant survival and success rates, marginal bone levels (MBL), and the incidence of biological and mechanical complications. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to assess the impact of patient- and implant-related characteristics on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up period of 11.51 years (SD: 4.03) the study recorded the loss of 12 NDIs in seven patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 90.3% (95% CI: 85.4%-95.4%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 77.2%-95.0%) respectively. The average marginal bone loss (MBL) was estimated at -0.75 (SD 1.34) mm. Mucositis was observed in 33.18% of the implants and peri-implantitis in 9.86% of the sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers valuable understanding of NDIs as a predictable option in implant dentistry, particularly for patients with challenging anatomical conditions. However, careful case selection and comprehensive treatment planning are crucial to minimize the risk of implant fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants in Posterior Sites in Patients With History of Periodontitis: A Retrospective Study With an 11.5-Year Mean Follow-Up.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Costanza Soldini, Isabel Arroyo, Riccardo Peragine, Enrique Roldán, Cristina Valles, Ramón Pons\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the factors influencing the survival and success rates of narrow diameter implants (NDIs) placed in the posterior area; additionally, the study evaluated marginal bone changes, along with biological and prosthetic complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 227 NDIs placed in the premolar and molar regions of 119 patients. The analysis focused on implant survival and success rates, marginal bone levels (MBL), and the incidence of biological and mechanical complications. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to assess the impact of patient- and implant-related characteristics on these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a mean follow-up period of 11.51 years (SD: 4.03) the study recorded the loss of 12 NDIs in seven patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 90.3% (95% CI: 85.4%-95.4%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 77.2%-95.0%) respectively. The average marginal bone loss (MBL) was estimated at -0.75 (SD 1.34) mm. Mucositis was observed in 33.18% of the implants and peri-implantitis in 9.86% of the sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers valuable understanding of NDIs as a predictable option in implant dentistry, particularly for patients with challenging anatomical conditions. However, careful case selection and comprehensive treatment planning are crucial to minimize the risk of implant fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响后路狭窄直径种植体成活率和成功率的因素;此外,该研究评估了边缘骨变化,以及生物和假体并发症。材料和方法:本回顾性单中心研究调查了119例患者放置在前磨牙和磨牙区域的227例ndi的临床和影像学结果。分析的重点是种植体的存活率和成功率,边缘骨水平(MBL),以及生物和机械并发症的发生率。采用广义估计方程(GEE)来评估患者和植入物相关特征对这些结果的影响。结果:在平均11.51年的随访期间(SD: 4.03),研究记录了7例患者12个ndi的丢失。Kaplan-Meier生存率分别为90.3% (95% CI: 85.4% ~ 95.4%)和85.7% (95% CI: 77.2% ~ 95.0%)。平均边缘骨损失(MBL)估计为-0.75 (SD 1.34) mm。33.18%的种植体出现粘膜炎,9.86%的种植体周围出现炎。结论:这项研究提供了有价值的理解ndi作为种植牙科可预测的选择,特别是对于具有挑战性解剖条件的患者。然而,谨慎的病例选择和全面的治疗计划对于减少种植体骨折的风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Evaluation of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants in Posterior Sites in Patients With History of Periodontitis: A Retrospective Study With an 11.5-Year Mean Follow-Up.

Aim: To assess the factors influencing the survival and success rates of narrow diameter implants (NDIs) placed in the posterior area; additionally, the study evaluated marginal bone changes, along with biological and prosthetic complications.

Materials and methods: This retrospective single-center study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 227 NDIs placed in the premolar and molar regions of 119 patients. The analysis focused on implant survival and success rates, marginal bone levels (MBL), and the incidence of biological and mechanical complications. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to assess the impact of patient- and implant-related characteristics on these outcomes.

Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 11.51 years (SD: 4.03) the study recorded the loss of 12 NDIs in seven patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 90.3% (95% CI: 85.4%-95.4%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 77.2%-95.0%) respectively. The average marginal bone loss (MBL) was estimated at -0.75 (SD 1.34) mm. Mucositis was observed in 33.18% of the implants and peri-implantitis in 9.86% of the sample.

Conclusion: This study offers valuable understanding of NDIs as a predictable option in implant dentistry, particularly for patients with challenging anatomical conditions. However, careful case selection and comprehensive treatment planning are crucial to minimize the risk of implant fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信