{"title":"[宫颈环扎术在短宫颈单胎妊娠中的疗效及宫颈长度的分层分析:一项回顾性匹配队列研究]。","authors":"L P Qiu, M Lyu, C Chen, Q Luo","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250429-00183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the clinical efficacy of cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancy with different degrees of short cervix. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of singleton pregnant women who underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination at 18-24<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation and found cervical dilation with cervical length (CL) ≤20 mm, and without history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion in Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2021 to September 2023 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. According to the case control matching, 78 pregnant women in the cerclage group and 78 women in the conservative treatment group were finally included. The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis of the two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the two groups of pregnant women were divided into three subgroups for stratification (CL≤10, 11-15, 16-20 mm). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to evaluate the effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in different subgroups. <b>Results:</b> (1) Compared with the conservative treatment group, the gestational age at delivery (median: 36 vs 37 weeks) and the duration of pregnancy extension (median: 90 vs 97 days) in the cerclage group were not significantly prolonged (all <i>P</i>>0.05). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.143). The rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (46.1% vs 31.2%, <i>P<</i>0.001), but there were no significant differences in other neonatal outcomes between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). (2) CL 16-20 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (28 cases), the cerclage group (18 cases) had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (3.6% vs 6/18, <i>P</i><0.001) and a significantly lower neonatal birth weight (median: 3 370 vs 2 925 g, <i>P</i><0.001). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.168). (3) CL 11-15 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (26 cases), the gestational age of delivery in the cerclage group (32 cases) was later (median: 36 and 37 weeks, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.001). (4) CL≤10 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (24 cases), the pregnant women in the cerclage group (28 cases) had a later gestational age at delivery (median: 34 vs 37 weeks), a longer duration of pregnancy (median: 74 vs 97 days), and a larger newborn birth weight (median: 2 300 vs 3 165 g). The rates of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation (45.8% vs 14.3%) and before 37 weeks of gestation (83.3% vs 39.3%) were lower, and the differences were all statistically significant (all <i>P</i><0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate of pregnant women in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i><0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Cervical cerclage could significantly prolong the gestational weeks and improve the perinatal outcomes for singleton pregnant women with cervical internal orifice dilation and CL≤15 mm without a history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"60 8","pages":"617-626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy of cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies with short cervix and stratified analysis of cervical length: a retrospective matched cohort study].\",\"authors\":\"L P Qiu, M Lyu, C Chen, Q Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250429-00183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the clinical efficacy of cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancy with different degrees of short cervix. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of singleton pregnant women who underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination at 18-24<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation and found cervical dilation with cervical length (CL) ≤20 mm, and without history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion in Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2021 to September 2023 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. According to the case control matching, 78 pregnant women in the cerclage group and 78 women in the conservative treatment group were finally included. The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis of the two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the two groups of pregnant women were divided into three subgroups for stratification (CL≤10, 11-15, 16-20 mm). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to evaluate the effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in different subgroups. <b>Results:</b> (1) Compared with the conservative treatment group, the gestational age at delivery (median: 36 vs 37 weeks) and the duration of pregnancy extension (median: 90 vs 97 days) in the cerclage group were not significantly prolonged (all <i>P</i>>0.05). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.143). The rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (46.1% vs 31.2%, <i>P<</i>0.001), but there were no significant differences in other neonatal outcomes between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). (2) CL 16-20 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (28 cases), the cerclage group (18 cases) had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (3.6% vs 6/18, <i>P</i><0.001) and a significantly lower neonatal birth weight (median: 3 370 vs 2 925 g, <i>P</i><0.001). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.168). (3) CL 11-15 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (26 cases), the gestational age of delivery in the cerclage group (32 cases) was later (median: 36 and 37 weeks, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i>=0.001). (4) CL≤10 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (24 cases), the pregnant women in the cerclage group (28 cases) had a later gestational age at delivery (median: 34 vs 37 weeks), a longer duration of pregnancy (median: 74 vs 97 days), and a larger newborn birth weight (median: 2 300 vs 3 165 g). The rates of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation (45.8% vs 14.3%) and before 37 weeks of gestation (83.3% vs 39.3%) were lower, and the differences were all statistically significant (all <i>P</i><0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate of pregnant women in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (<i>P</i><0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Cervical cerclage could significantly prolong the gestational weeks and improve the perinatal outcomes for singleton pregnant women with cervical internal orifice dilation and CL≤15 mm without a history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华妇产科杂志\",\"volume\":\"60 8\",\"pages\":\"617-626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华妇产科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250429-00183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20250429-00183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨宫颈环扎术治疗不同程度宫颈短的单胎妊娠的临床疗效。方法:收集2021年1月至2023年9月浙江大学医学院附属妇产医院经阴道超声检查发现宫颈扩张、宫颈长度(CL)≤20 mm、无自然早产或晚期流产史的妊娠18-24+6周单胎孕妇的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据病例对照匹配,最终纳入环扎术组78例孕妇和保守治疗组78例孕妇。比较两组妊娠结局及新生儿预后。同时将两组孕妇分为3个亚组进行分层(CL≤10、11-15、16-20 mm)。采用多因素logistic回归分析和Kaplan-Meier曲线评价宫颈环扎术对不同亚组妊娠结局的影响。结果:(1)与保守治疗组比较,环扎术组分娩胎龄(中位数:36 vs 37周)和妊娠延长时间(中位数:90 vs 97天)均无显著延长(P < 0.05)。环扎术组与保守治疗组的累计未分娩率差异无统计学意义(P=0.143)。环扎术组新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率显著高于保守治疗组(46.1% vs 31.2%, P0.001),但两组其他新生儿结局无显著差异(P < 0.05)。(2) CL 16-20 mm亚组:与保守治疗组(28例)相比,环扎组(18例)37周前早产率显著高于保守治疗组(3.6% vs 6/18, PPP=0.168)。(3) CL 11-15 mm亚组:与保守治疗组(26例)相比,环扎组(32例)分娩胎龄较晚(中位:分别为36周和37周),差异有统计学意义(PP=0.001)。(4) CL≤10 mm亚组:与保守治疗组(24例)相比,环扎术组(28例)孕妇分娩时胎龄较晚(中位数:34 vs 37周),妊娠持续时间较长(中位数:74 vs 97天),新生儿体重较大(中位数:2 300 vs 3 165 g)。妊娠34周前早产率(45.8% vs 14.3%)和妊娠37周前早产率(83.3% vs 39.3%)均较低,差异均有统计学意义(均ppp)。结论:宫颈内孔扩张、CL≤15 mm且无自然早产或晚期流产史的单胎妊娠孕妇行宫颈环切术可显著延长妊娠周,改善围产儿结局。
[Efficacy of cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies with short cervix and stratified analysis of cervical length: a retrospective matched cohort study].
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancy with different degrees of short cervix. Methods: The clinical data of singleton pregnant women who underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination at 18-24+6 weeks of gestation and found cervical dilation with cervical length (CL) ≤20 mm, and without history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion in Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2021 to September 2023 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. According to the case control matching, 78 pregnant women in the cerclage group and 78 women in the conservative treatment group were finally included. The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis of the two groups were compared. Meanwhile, the two groups of pregnant women were divided into three subgroups for stratification (CL≤10, 11-15, 16-20 mm). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to evaluate the effect of cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcomes in different subgroups. Results: (1) Compared with the conservative treatment group, the gestational age at delivery (median: 36 vs 37 weeks) and the duration of pregnancy extension (median: 90 vs 97 days) in the cerclage group were not significantly prolonged (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (P=0.143). The rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (46.1% vs 31.2%, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in other neonatal outcomes between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) CL 16-20 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (28 cases), the cerclage group (18 cases) had a significantly higher rate of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (3.6% vs 6/18, P<0.001) and a significantly lower neonatal birth weight (median: 3 370 vs 2 925 g, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the cumulative non-delivery rate between the cerclage group and the conservative treatment group (P=0.168). (3) CL 11-15 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (26 cases), the gestational age of delivery in the cerclage group (32 cases) was later (median: 36 and 37 weeks, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (P=0.001). (4) CL≤10 mm subgroup: compared with the conservative treatment group (24 cases), the pregnant women in the cerclage group (28 cases) had a later gestational age at delivery (median: 34 vs 37 weeks), a longer duration of pregnancy (median: 74 vs 97 days), and a larger newborn birth weight (median: 2 300 vs 3 165 g). The rates of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation (45.8% vs 14.3%) and before 37 weeks of gestation (83.3% vs 39.3%) were lower, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). The cumulative non-delivery rate of pregnant women in the cerclage group was significantly higher than that in the conservative treatment group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Cervical cerclage could significantly prolong the gestational weeks and improve the perinatal outcomes for singleton pregnant women with cervical internal orifice dilation and CL≤15 mm without a history of spontaneous preterm delivery or late abortion.