{"title":"新辅助靶向治疗对可切除肺腺癌肿瘤微环境的影响。","authors":"Ling Yi, Heng Yao, Zhexin Bai, Ziwei Xu, Huimin Li, Yuting Cheng, Chong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s13402-025-01101-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant targeted therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of the immune status of tumor microenvironment (TME) after targeted therapies is crucial for understanding the impact of targeted therapy on the TME and providing a basis for synergistic therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients with resectable lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were enrolled in this study, and multiplex immunofluorescence technology was used to explore the immune status of the TME after neoadjuvant targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 42 patients, 9 (21.4%) and 33 (78.6%) had ALK and EGFR mutations, respectively, and TKIs were their first-line treatment. All patients received R0 resection, and thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery were the predominant method. Seven (16.7%) patients reached pathological complete response (pCR), 4 (9.5%) get major pathological response (MPR), and these 11 patients were classified into the MPR group. The remaining 31 (73.8%) patients were non-MPR. The densities of CD8 + T cells (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.004, P = 0.008), PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.019, P = 0.036), macrophages (P = 0.020, P = 0.007), M1 macrophages (P = 0.010, P = 0.007), and ratios of CD8 + T/Treg (P < 0.001, P = 0.026) in TME were significantly higher in the MPR group and ALK mutation group compared with non-MPR and EGFR group. There were positive correlations between CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.397, P = 0.009) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.351, P = 0.023); CD8 + T cells and macrophages (r = 0.343, P = 0.026), and M1 macrophages (r = 0.412, P = 0.007). Additionally, eleven patients experienced disease progress during the follow-up period, and the Log-Rank test revealed that MPR patients tended to get longer PFS compared with non-MPR patients (P = 0.063), especially patients with higher densities of macrophages in the TME had significantly longer PFS (P = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TKI-targeted therapy could reduce tumor burden, facilitating complete surgical resection. Patients with MPR and ALK mutations had a higher density of inflammatory immune cells in the TME and those with higher densities of macrophage had significantly longer PFS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9690,"journal":{"name":"Cellular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy on the tumor microenvironment in resectable lung adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Yi, Heng Yao, Zhexin Bai, Ziwei Xu, Huimin Li, Yuting Cheng, Chong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13402-025-01101-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant targeted therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of the immune status of tumor microenvironment (TME) after targeted therapies is crucial for understanding the impact of targeted therapy on the TME and providing a basis for synergistic therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients with resectable lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were enrolled in this study, and multiplex immunofluorescence technology was used to explore the immune status of the TME after neoadjuvant targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 42 patients, 9 (21.4%) and 33 (78.6%) had ALK and EGFR mutations, respectively, and TKIs were their first-line treatment. All patients received R0 resection, and thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery were the predominant method. Seven (16.7%) patients reached pathological complete response (pCR), 4 (9.5%) get major pathological response (MPR), and these 11 patients were classified into the MPR group. The remaining 31 (73.8%) patients were non-MPR. The densities of CD8 + T cells (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.004, P = 0.008), PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.019, P = 0.036), macrophages (P = 0.020, P = 0.007), M1 macrophages (P = 0.010, P = 0.007), and ratios of CD8 + T/Treg (P < 0.001, P = 0.026) in TME were significantly higher in the MPR group and ALK mutation group compared with non-MPR and EGFR group. There were positive correlations between CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.397, P = 0.009) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.351, P = 0.023); CD8 + T cells and macrophages (r = 0.343, P = 0.026), and M1 macrophages (r = 0.412, P = 0.007). Additionally, eleven patients experienced disease progress during the follow-up period, and the Log-Rank test revealed that MPR patients tended to get longer PFS compared with non-MPR patients (P = 0.063), especially patients with higher densities of macrophages in the TME had significantly longer PFS (P = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TKI-targeted therapy could reduce tumor burden, facilitating complete surgical resection. Patients with MPR and ALK mutations had a higher density of inflammatory immune cells in the TME and those with higher densities of macrophage had significantly longer PFS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-025-01101-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-025-01101-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy on the tumor microenvironment in resectable lung adenocarcinoma.
Background: Neoadjuvant targeted therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of the immune status of tumor microenvironment (TME) after targeted therapies is crucial for understanding the impact of targeted therapy on the TME and providing a basis for synergistic therapeutic approaches.
Methods: Forty-two patients with resectable lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were enrolled in this study, and multiplex immunofluorescence technology was used to explore the immune status of the TME after neoadjuvant targeted therapies.
Results: Among the 42 patients, 9 (21.4%) and 33 (78.6%) had ALK and EGFR mutations, respectively, and TKIs were their first-line treatment. All patients received R0 resection, and thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery were the predominant method. Seven (16.7%) patients reached pathological complete response (pCR), 4 (9.5%) get major pathological response (MPR), and these 11 patients were classified into the MPR group. The remaining 31 (73.8%) patients were non-MPR. The densities of CD8 + T cells (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.004, P = 0.008), PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.019, P = 0.036), macrophages (P = 0.020, P = 0.007), M1 macrophages (P = 0.010, P = 0.007), and ratios of CD8 + T/Treg (P < 0.001, P = 0.026) in TME were significantly higher in the MPR group and ALK mutation group compared with non-MPR and EGFR group. There were positive correlations between CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.397, P = 0.009) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.351, P = 0.023); CD8 + T cells and macrophages (r = 0.343, P = 0.026), and M1 macrophages (r = 0.412, P = 0.007). Additionally, eleven patients experienced disease progress during the follow-up period, and the Log-Rank test revealed that MPR patients tended to get longer PFS compared with non-MPR patients (P = 0.063), especially patients with higher densities of macrophages in the TME had significantly longer PFS (P = 0.042).
Conclusion: TKI-targeted therapy could reduce tumor burden, facilitating complete surgical resection. Patients with MPR and ALK mutations had a higher density of inflammatory immune cells in the TME and those with higher densities of macrophage had significantly longer PFS.
Cellular OncologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology
Focuses on translational research
Addresses the conversion of cell biology to clinical applications
Cellular Oncology publishes scientific contributions from various biomedical and clinical disciplines involved in basic and translational cancer research on the cell and tissue level, technical and bioinformatics developments in this area, and clinical applications. This includes a variety of fields like genome technology, micro-arrays and other high-throughput techniques, genomic instability, SNP, DNA methylation, signaling pathways, DNA organization, (sub)microscopic imaging, proteomics, bioinformatics, functional effects of genomics, drug design and development, molecular diagnostics and targeted cancer therapies, genotype-phenotype interactions.
A major goal is to translate the latest developments in these fields from the research laboratory into routine patient management. To this end Cellular Oncology forms a platform of scientific information exchange between molecular biologists and geneticists, technical developers, pathologists, (medical) oncologists and other clinicians involved in the management of cancer patients.
In vitro studies are preferentially supported by validations in tumor tissue with clinicopathological associations.