Katherine Hansen, Christina Sillman, Caroline Scribner, Emily Dong, Beth Kaufman, Anitra Romfh, Harvey Cohen, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, Lindsay A Edwards
{"title":"患有先天性心脏病的青少年和年轻人的预先护理计划:成人患者的观点。","authors":"Katherine Hansen, Christina Sillman, Caroline Scribner, Emily Dong, Beth Kaufman, Anitra Romfh, Harvey Cohen, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, Lindsay A Edwards","doi":"10.1017/S1047951125101510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the importance of advance care planning (ACP) for individuals with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) has been established, there is no consensus regarding the optimal age to initiate ACP discussions. We asked ACHD patients their opinions about the timing of the first ACP discussion.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Adult patients seen in an outpatient ACHD clinic from April to August 2018 completed a self-administered questionnaire that evaluated opinions regarding the content and timing of ACP discussions, end-of-life communication preferences, and anticipated emotional responses to ACP discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients participated. Median age was 34.8 years (Q1 - Q3: 28.4 - 47.1 years), 53% (<i>n</i> = 50) were female, and 91% (<i>n</i> = 86) had great or moderate disease complexity. Although 75% (<i>n/N</i> = 69/92) thought ACP was important, only 37% (<i>n/N</i> = 35/94) had completed advance directives. Most (79%, <i>n/N</i> = 72/91) preferred ACP conversations early, either before getting sick (44%, <i>n</i> = 40/91) or when first diagnosed with a life-threatening illness (35%, <i>n</i> = 32/91). Responses varied regarding the appropriate age for first ACP conversations: 28% (<i>n/N</i> = 25/88) chose options ≤ 15 years, 23% (<i>n/N</i> = 20/88) 16-17 years, 32% (<i>n/N</i> = 28/88) 18-20 years, and 17% (<i>n/N</i> = 15/88) ≥ 21 years old.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ACHD patients value ACP discussions and think they should occur early in the disease course, before patients face a life-threatening disease complication, yet most think these conversations should wait until later adolescent or young adult years. ACP readiness should be assessed to determine the optimal timing of ACP discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1602-1608"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advance care planning for adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease: the adult patient perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Hansen, Christina Sillman, Caroline Scribner, Emily Dong, Beth Kaufman, Anitra Romfh, Harvey Cohen, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, Lindsay A Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1047951125101510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the importance of advance care planning (ACP) for individuals with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) has been established, there is no consensus regarding the optimal age to initiate ACP discussions. We asked ACHD patients their opinions about the timing of the first ACP discussion.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Adult patients seen in an outpatient ACHD clinic from April to August 2018 completed a self-administered questionnaire that evaluated opinions regarding the content and timing of ACP discussions, end-of-life communication preferences, and anticipated emotional responses to ACP discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients participated. Median age was 34.8 years (Q1 - Q3: 28.4 - 47.1 years), 53% (<i>n</i> = 50) were female, and 91% (<i>n</i> = 86) had great or moderate disease complexity. Although 75% (<i>n/N</i> = 69/92) thought ACP was important, only 37% (<i>n/N</i> = 35/94) had completed advance directives. Most (79%, <i>n/N</i> = 72/91) preferred ACP conversations early, either before getting sick (44%, <i>n</i> = 40/91) or when first diagnosed with a life-threatening illness (35%, <i>n</i> = 32/91). Responses varied regarding the appropriate age for first ACP conversations: 28% (<i>n/N</i> = 25/88) chose options ≤ 15 years, 23% (<i>n/N</i> = 20/88) 16-17 years, 32% (<i>n/N</i> = 28/88) 18-20 years, and 17% (<i>n/N</i> = 15/88) ≥ 21 years old.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ACHD patients value ACP discussions and think they should occur early in the disease course, before patients face a life-threatening disease complication, yet most think these conversations should wait until later adolescent or young adult years. ACP readiness should be assessed to determine the optimal timing of ACP discussions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1602-1608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125101510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125101510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:虽然预先护理计划(ACP)对成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者的重要性已经确立,但关于启动ACP讨论的最佳年龄尚未达成共识。我们询问了ACHD患者对第一次ACP讨论时间的意见。材料/方法:2018年4月至8月在门诊ACHD诊所就诊的成年患者完成了一份自我管理的问卷,评估了ACP讨论的内容和时间、临终沟通偏好以及对ACP讨论的预期情绪反应。结果:95例患者参与。中位年龄34.8岁(Q1 - Q3: 28.4 - 47.1岁),53% (n = 50)为女性,91% (n = 86)有严重或中度疾病复杂性。虽然75% (n/ n = 69/92)认为ACP很重要,但只有37% (n/ n = 35/94)完成了预先指示。大多数人(79%,n/ n = 72/91)更喜欢在生病之前(44%,n = 40/91)或在首次诊断出危及生命的疾病时(35%,n = 32/91)尽早进行ACP对话。对于首次ACP对话的合适年龄,受访者的回答各不相同:28% (n/ n = 25/88)的受访者选择≤15岁,23% (n/ n = 20/88)的受访者选择16-17岁,32% (n/ n = 28/88)的受访者选择18-20岁,17% (n/ n = 15/88)的受访者选择≥21岁。讨论:ACHD患者重视ACP讨论,并认为他们应该在疾病过程的早期,在患者面临危及生命的疾病并发症之前进行讨论,但大多数人认为这些对话应该等到青少年后期或青年时期。应评估ACP的准备情况,以确定讨论ACP的最佳时机。
Advance care planning for adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease: the adult patient perspective.
Introduction: Although the importance of advance care planning (ACP) for individuals with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) has been established, there is no consensus regarding the optimal age to initiate ACP discussions. We asked ACHD patients their opinions about the timing of the first ACP discussion.
Materials/methods: Adult patients seen in an outpatient ACHD clinic from April to August 2018 completed a self-administered questionnaire that evaluated opinions regarding the content and timing of ACP discussions, end-of-life communication preferences, and anticipated emotional responses to ACP discussions.
Results: Ninety-five patients participated. Median age was 34.8 years (Q1 - Q3: 28.4 - 47.1 years), 53% (n = 50) were female, and 91% (n = 86) had great or moderate disease complexity. Although 75% (n/N = 69/92) thought ACP was important, only 37% (n/N = 35/94) had completed advance directives. Most (79%, n/N = 72/91) preferred ACP conversations early, either before getting sick (44%, n = 40/91) or when first diagnosed with a life-threatening illness (35%, n = 32/91). Responses varied regarding the appropriate age for first ACP conversations: 28% (n/N = 25/88) chose options ≤ 15 years, 23% (n/N = 20/88) 16-17 years, 32% (n/N = 28/88) 18-20 years, and 17% (n/N = 15/88) ≥ 21 years old.
Discussion: ACHD patients value ACP discussions and think they should occur early in the disease course, before patients face a life-threatening disease complication, yet most think these conversations should wait until later adolescent or young adult years. ACP readiness should be assessed to determine the optimal timing of ACP discussions.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.