输尿管膀胱交界处输尿管壁厚度是预测输尿管膀胱交界处结石药物排出治疗的重要因素。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tiancan Yang, Jian Ji, Yafei Wang, Xiaowen Gao, Lingmin Lei, Lvyang Chen, Shicheng Fan, Zhida Wu, Wei Pu, Yunbo Shang
{"title":"输尿管膀胱交界处输尿管壁厚度是预测输尿管膀胱交界处结石药物排出治疗的重要因素。","authors":"Tiancan Yang, Jian Ji, Yafei Wang, Xiaowen Gao, Lingmin Lei, Lvyang Chen, Shicheng Fan, Zhida Wu, Wei Pu, Yunbo Shang","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01890-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) measured by ultrasound for predicting spontaneous passage (SP) of uncomplicated UVJ stones.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 170 patients ≥ 18 years old, and size ≤ 10 mm of single UVJ stone, who were examined and treated in the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 2020 to January 2024. The analysis included the size of the stones, the maximum UWT at the stone site measured by ultrasound, the degree of hydronephrosis, and the time of stone removal.According to the different results after four weeks of medical expulsive therapy (MET), the patients were separated into two categories: Stone-passing group (SPG) and non-stone-passing group (NSPG). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilised to evaluate the clinical predictors of MET.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the accuracy of the UWT at the UVJ in predicting successful MET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPG comprised 112 cases (65.9%), while the NSPG consisted of 58 cases (34.2%). Univariate analysis, employing both the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test, revealed that gender, age, stone side and degree of hydronephrosis were not statistically significant. However, stone size and UWT were found to be influencing factors in regard to stone removal. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that UWT and size were independent influencing factor of MET. The ROC analysis indicated that 3.705 mm was the ideal threshold for UWT, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 72.4% and 68.7%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.737.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UWT at the UVJ has a high predictive value for the MET of stones at this position, thus avoiding the adverse consequences of delayed stone discharge caused by unnecessary surgical operation and MET.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.\",\"authors\":\"Tiancan Yang, Jian Ji, Yafei Wang, Xiaowen Gao, Lingmin Lei, Lvyang Chen, Shicheng Fan, Zhida Wu, Wei Pu, Yunbo Shang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01890-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) measured by ultrasound for predicting spontaneous passage (SP) of uncomplicated UVJ stones.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 170 patients ≥ 18 years old, and size ≤ 10 mm of single UVJ stone, who were examined and treated in the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 2020 to January 2024. The analysis included the size of the stones, the maximum UWT at the stone site measured by ultrasound, the degree of hydronephrosis, and the time of stone removal.According to the different results after four weeks of medical expulsive therapy (MET), the patients were separated into two categories: Stone-passing group (SPG) and non-stone-passing group (NSPG). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilised to evaluate the clinical predictors of MET.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the accuracy of the UWT at the UVJ in predicting successful MET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPG comprised 112 cases (65.9%), while the NSPG consisted of 58 cases (34.2%). Univariate analysis, employing both the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test, revealed that gender, age, stone side and degree of hydronephrosis were not statistically significant. However, stone size and UWT were found to be influencing factors in regard to stone removal. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that UWT and size were independent influencing factor of MET. The ROC analysis indicated that 3.705 mm was the ideal threshold for UWT, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 72.4% and 68.7%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.737.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UWT at the UVJ has a high predictive value for the MET of stones at this position, thus avoiding the adverse consequences of delayed stone discharge caused by unnecessary surgical operation and MET.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01890-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01890-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评价超声测量输尿管膀胱交界处(UVJ)输尿管壁厚度(UWT)对非复杂性UVJ结石自发通过(SP)的预测价值。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2024年1月云南省第三人民医院检查和治疗的170例≥18岁,单个UVJ结石大小≤10 mm的患者。分析包括结石的大小、超声测量的结石部位的最大UWT、肾积水的程度和取出结石的时间。根据药物排出治疗(MET) 4周后的不同结果,将患者分为结石排出组(SPG)和非结石排出组(NSPG)。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评估MET的临床预测因素。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来评估UWT在UVJ预测成功MET的准确性。结果:SPG 112例(65.9%),NSPG 58例(34.2%)。单因素分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,结果显示性别、年龄、结石侧面和肾积水程度无统计学意义。然而,结石大小和UWT被发现是影响结石去除的因素。二元logistic回归分析表明,UWT和大小是MET的独立影响因素。ROC分析显示,3.705 mm为UWT的理想阈值,灵敏度和特异度分别为72.4%和68.7%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.737。结论:UVJ处的UWT对该部位结石的MET具有较高的预测价值,避免了不必要的手术和MET导致结石延迟排出的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.

Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.

Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.

Ureteral wall thickness at the ureterovesical junction as a significant factor in predicting medical expulsive therapy of ureterovesical junction stones.

Background: To evaluate ureteral wall thickness (UWT) at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) measured by ultrasound for predicting spontaneous passage (SP) of uncomplicated UVJ stones.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 170 patients ≥ 18 years old, and size ≤ 10 mm of single UVJ stone, who were examined and treated in the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from January 2020 to January 2024. The analysis included the size of the stones, the maximum UWT at the stone site measured by ultrasound, the degree of hydronephrosis, and the time of stone removal.According to the different results after four weeks of medical expulsive therapy (MET), the patients were separated into two categories: Stone-passing group (SPG) and non-stone-passing group (NSPG). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilised to evaluate the clinical predictors of MET.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the accuracy of the UWT at the UVJ in predicting successful MET.

Results: The SPG comprised 112 cases (65.9%), while the NSPG consisted of 58 cases (34.2%). Univariate analysis, employing both the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test, revealed that gender, age, stone side and degree of hydronephrosis were not statistically significant. However, stone size and UWT were found to be influencing factors in regard to stone removal. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that UWT and size were independent influencing factor of MET. The ROC analysis indicated that 3.705 mm was the ideal threshold for UWT, with sensitivity and specificity levels of 72.4% and 68.7%, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.737.

Conclusions: The UWT at the UVJ has a high predictive value for the MET of stones at this position, thus avoiding the adverse consequences of delayed stone discharge caused by unnecessary surgical operation and MET.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信