Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu
{"title":"干细胞治疗勃起功能障碍:希望还是现实?-临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: \"stem cell\" AND (\"erectile dysfunction\" OR \"erectile function\" OR \"erection\" OR \"impotence\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: \\\"stem cell\\\" AND (\\\"erectile dysfunction\\\" OR \\\"erectile function\\\" OR \\\"erection\\\" OR \\\"impotence\\\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Background: The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.
Methods: The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: "stem cell" AND ("erectile dysfunction" OR "erectile function" OR "erection" OR "impotence").
Results: We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.
期刊介绍:
BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology:
Endourology and technology
Epidemiology and health outcomes
Pediatric urology
Pre-clinical and basic research
Reconstructive urology
Sexual function and fertility
Urological imaging
Urological oncology
Voiding dysfunction
Case reports.