干细胞治疗勃起功能障碍:希望还是现实?-临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu
{"title":"干细胞治疗勃起功能障碍:希望还是现实?-临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: \"stem cell\" AND (\"erectile dysfunction\" OR \"erectile function\" OR \"erection\" OR \"impotence\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Samet Senel, Ahmet Halil Sevinc, Huseyin Gultekin, Abduvaliyev Jaxongir Ravshanbekovich, Huseyin Besiroglu, Murat Dursun, Ates Kadioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: \\\"stem cell\\\" AND (\\\"erectile dysfunction\\\" OR \\\"erectile function\\\" OR \\\"erection\\\" OR \\\"impotence\\\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01913-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:干细胞疗法(SCT)治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的临床试验结果是有希望的,但仍然没有关于其疗效的确凿证据。本荟萃分析的目的是汇编评估SCT治疗ED有效性的研究,以得出更可靠的结论。方法:meta分析注册到PROSPERO (CRD42024540511)。我们使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南来报告结果。2000年1月至2024年5月发表的文章被纳入系统评价。我们使用关键词进行了系统搜索:“干细胞”和(“勃起功能障碍”或“勃起功能”或“勃起”或“阳痿”)。结果:我们最初使用搜索词在完整出版物或摘要中确定了2013项研究。11项研究纳入系统评价,其中6项纳入荟萃分析。系统评价中包括的大多数研究报告了海绵体内SCT后勃起功能的改善。荟萃分析显示,6个月时国际勃起功能指数-5 (IIEF-5)、国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域(IIEF-EF)、勃起硬度评分(EHS)和峰值收缩速度(PSV)均有显著改善(p 0.05)。结论:与基线相比,海绵体内SCT可能会增加6个月时评估问卷的得分,这是目前报道的最长随访时间,但需要更长随访时间的比较试验来得出更明确的结论并揭示长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: promise or reality? - a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Background: The outcomes of clinical trials on stem cell therapy (SCT) on erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment are promising but there is still no conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compile studies that assess the effectiveness of SCT on ED to reach a more reliable conclusion.

Methods: The meta-analysis was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42024540511). We utilized the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline to report the outcomes. Articles published from January 2000 to May 2024 were included for systematic review. We performed a systematic search using keywords: "stem cell" AND ("erectile dysfunction" OR "erectile function" OR "erection" OR "impotence").

Results: We initially identified 2,013 studies in full publications or abstracts using the search terms. Eleven studies were included in systematic review and six of them were included in meta-analysis. Most studies included in systematic review reported improvements in erectile function following intracavernosal SCT. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvements at six months in international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), international index of erectile function-erectile function domain) IIEF-EF, erectile hardness score (EHS), and peak systolic velocity (PSV) (p < 0.05). End-diastolic velocity (EDV) increased significantly at 3 months (p = 0.031) but not at six months (p = 0.868). Heterogeneity ranged from low to high (I² = 0-71.2%). No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Intracavernosal SCT may increase scores on the questionnaires evaluated compared to baseline at six months which currently represent the longest reported follow-up duration but comparative trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw more definitive conclusions and reveal long-term effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信