坦桑尼亚切割女性生殖器官的相关因素:来自坦桑尼亚2022年人口与健康调查的见解。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tumaini Nyamhanga, Oliva Kapinga, Brian A Muro, Pankras Luoga
{"title":"坦桑尼亚切割女性生殖器官的相关因素:来自坦桑尼亚2022年人口与健康调查的见解。","authors":"Tumaini Nyamhanga, Oliva Kapinga, Brian A Muro, Pankras Luoga","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03965-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, female genital mutilation (FGM) remains a significant public health concern. The practice is disproportionately high in African countries. In Tanzania, FGM poses serious health risks to both women, girls and children. However, there is limited empirical literature on the factors associated with FGM in Tanzania. This study intended to fill the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we analysed secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, involving a weighted sample of 7,678 women aged 15-49 from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS). In this study, the binary dependent variable indicates whether the respondent is mutilated or not mutilated while the independent variables include various demographic characteristics of women, such as age, education level, socioeconomic status, and region of residence. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. A threshold of p-value < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to determine a statistically significant association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2% and types I and II (a cut with or without removal of flesh) were the dominant types of FGM practice by 89.2%. After controlling for other variables, higher odds of being mutilated was reported in; older ages 45-49 years (adjusted Odds Ratio(aOR));3.09, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54), in rural areas (aOR;2.30, 95%CI:1.4,3.6), in women in unions (aOR;1.60, 95%CI:1.20,2.10), in Northern zone (aOR;9.10, 95%CI: 4.60, 17.80), those who ever heard about FGM had 2.27 times (aOR; 2.27, 95%CI: 0.82, 6.29), those who said FGM required by religion had 8.3 times (aOR; 8.30, 95%CI: 4.30,16.03), those who supported FGM had 5.29 times (aOR; 5.29, 95%CI: 2.69, 10.40) higher odds of reporting having undergone FGM compared to those who said the practice should be stopped. Conversely, lower odds of experiencing FGM was reported in; women with at least secondary education (aOR;0.40, 95%CI:0.20,0.60), those from richest households (aOR;0.40, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.60) and those who said distance to a health facility was not a big problem (aOR;0.70, 95%CI: 0.50, 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2%. The factors associated with experiencing FGM included woman's socio-demographic factors like older age, rural residency, lower or no education, poorest wealth quintile, supporting FGM to continue and being in unions. This calls for collaborative efforts between the government and other stakeholders to design targeted interventions as ending FGM require a multisectoral approach addressing aforementioned determinants across multiple levels including education and wealth creation programs particularly to uneducated and poorest women from rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with female genital mutilation/cutting in Tanzania: insights from Tanzania demographic and health survey 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Tumaini Nyamhanga, Oliva Kapinga, Brian A Muro, Pankras Luoga\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03965-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, female genital mutilation (FGM) remains a significant public health concern. The practice is disproportionately high in African countries. In Tanzania, FGM poses serious health risks to both women, girls and children. However, there is limited empirical literature on the factors associated with FGM in Tanzania. This study intended to fill the gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we analysed secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, involving a weighted sample of 7,678 women aged 15-49 from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS). In this study, the binary dependent variable indicates whether the respondent is mutilated or not mutilated while the independent variables include various demographic characteristics of women, such as age, education level, socioeconomic status, and region of residence. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. A threshold of p-value < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to determine a statistically significant association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2% and types I and II (a cut with or without removal of flesh) were the dominant types of FGM practice by 89.2%. After controlling for other variables, higher odds of being mutilated was reported in; older ages 45-49 years (adjusted Odds Ratio(aOR));3.09, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54), in rural areas (aOR;2.30, 95%CI:1.4,3.6), in women in unions (aOR;1.60, 95%CI:1.20,2.10), in Northern zone (aOR;9.10, 95%CI: 4.60, 17.80), those who ever heard about FGM had 2.27 times (aOR; 2.27, 95%CI: 0.82, 6.29), those who said FGM required by religion had 8.3 times (aOR; 8.30, 95%CI: 4.30,16.03), those who supported FGM had 5.29 times (aOR; 5.29, 95%CI: 2.69, 10.40) higher odds of reporting having undergone FGM compared to those who said the practice should be stopped. Conversely, lower odds of experiencing FGM was reported in; women with at least secondary education (aOR;0.40, 95%CI:0.20,0.60), those from richest households (aOR;0.40, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.60) and those who said distance to a health facility was not a big problem (aOR;0.70, 95%CI: 0.50, 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2%. The factors associated with experiencing FGM included woman's socio-demographic factors like older age, rural residency, lower or no education, poorest wealth quintile, supporting FGM to continue and being in unions. This calls for collaborative efforts between the government and other stakeholders to design targeted interventions as ending FGM require a multisectoral approach addressing aforementioned determinants across multiple levels including education and wealth creation programs particularly to uneducated and poorest women from rural areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03965-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03965-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在全球范围内,切割女性生殖器官仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题。这种做法在非洲国家尤为普遍。在坦桑尼亚,切割女性生殖器官对妇女、女童和儿童构成严重的健康风险。然而,关于坦桑尼亚女性生殖器切割相关因素的经验文献有限。本研究旨在填补这一空白。方法:在本研究中,我们分析了横断面调查的次要数据,涉及2022年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查(TDHS)中7,678名15-49岁女性的加权样本。在这项研究中,二元因变量表示被调查者是否残废,而自变量包括女性的各种人口统计学特征,如年龄、教育水平、社会经济地位和居住地区。进行了双变量和多变量logistic回归分析。p值阈值结果:坦桑尼亚女性生殖器切割的患病率为8.2%,I型和II型(切除或不切除肉)是女性生殖器切割的主要类型,占89.2%。在控制了其他变量之后,在;老年人45-49岁(调整比值比(aOR);3.09, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54),农村地区(aOR;2.30, 95%CI:1.4,3.6),工会妇女(aOR;1.60, 95%CI:1.20,2.10),北部地区(aOR;9.10, 95%CI: 4.60, 17.80),曾经听说过女性生殖器切割的人有2.27次(aOR; 2.27, 95%CI: 0.82, 6.29),说宗教要求女性生殖器切割的人有8.3次(aOR; 8.30, 95%CI: 4.30,16.03),支持女性生殖器切割的人有5.29次(aOR; 1.72, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54);(5.29, 95%可信区间:2.69,10.40)与那些认为应该停止这种做法的人相比,报告经历过女性生殖器切割的几率更高。相反,据报道经历女性生殖器切割的几率较低;至少受过中等教育的妇女(aOR;0.40, 95%可信区间:0.20,0.60)、来自最富裕家庭的妇女(aOR;0.40, 95%可信区间:0.20,0.60)和认为距离卫生设施不是大问题的妇女(aOR;0.70, 95%可信区间:0.50,0.90)。结论:我们的研究发现坦桑尼亚女性生殖器切割的患病率为8.2%。与经历女性生殖器切割相关的因素包括妇女的社会人口因素,如年龄较大、居住在农村、受教育程度较低或没有教育、最贫穷的五分之一、支持女性生殖器切割继续以及参加工会。这需要政府和其他利益攸关方共同努力,设计有针对性的干预措施,因为终止女性生殖器切割需要采取多部门方法,在多个层面解决上述决定因素,包括教育和财富创造计划,特别是针对农村地区未受教育和最贫困的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with female genital mutilation/cutting in Tanzania: insights from Tanzania demographic and health survey 2022.

Background: Globally, female genital mutilation (FGM) remains a significant public health concern. The practice is disproportionately high in African countries. In Tanzania, FGM poses serious health risks to both women, girls and children. However, there is limited empirical literature on the factors associated with FGM in Tanzania. This study intended to fill the gap.

Methods: In this study, we analysed secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, involving a weighted sample of 7,678 women aged 15-49 from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS). In this study, the binary dependent variable indicates whether the respondent is mutilated or not mutilated while the independent variables include various demographic characteristics of women, such as age, education level, socioeconomic status, and region of residence. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. A threshold of p-value < 0.05 at 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to determine a statistically significant association.

Results: The prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2% and types I and II (a cut with or without removal of flesh) were the dominant types of FGM practice by 89.2%. After controlling for other variables, higher odds of being mutilated was reported in; older ages 45-49 years (adjusted Odds Ratio(aOR));3.09, 95%CI: 1.72, 5.54), in rural areas (aOR;2.30, 95%CI:1.4,3.6), in women in unions (aOR;1.60, 95%CI:1.20,2.10), in Northern zone (aOR;9.10, 95%CI: 4.60, 17.80), those who ever heard about FGM had 2.27 times (aOR; 2.27, 95%CI: 0.82, 6.29), those who said FGM required by religion had 8.3 times (aOR; 8.30, 95%CI: 4.30,16.03), those who supported FGM had 5.29 times (aOR; 5.29, 95%CI: 2.69, 10.40) higher odds of reporting having undergone FGM compared to those who said the practice should be stopped. Conversely, lower odds of experiencing FGM was reported in; women with at least secondary education (aOR;0.40, 95%CI:0.20,0.60), those from richest households (aOR;0.40, 95%CI: 0.20, 0.60) and those who said distance to a health facility was not a big problem (aOR;0.70, 95%CI: 0.50, 0.90).

Conclusion: Our study found that prevalence of FGM in Tanzania is 8.2%. The factors associated with experiencing FGM included woman's socio-demographic factors like older age, rural residency, lower or no education, poorest wealth quintile, supporting FGM to continue and being in unions. This calls for collaborative efforts between the government and other stakeholders to design targeted interventions as ending FGM require a multisectoral approach addressing aforementioned determinants across multiple levels including education and wealth creation programs particularly to uneducated and poorest women from rural areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信