中心血液透析患者贫血管理人工智能决策支持系统的健康经济评价

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic
{"title":"中心血液透析患者贫血管理人工智能决策支持系统的健康经济评价","authors":"Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:贫血控制模型(ACM)是一个由人工智能核心驱动的决策支持系统,旨在帮助肾病学家管理中心血液透析(HD)患者的贫血治疗。本研究旨在评估ACM与德国标准护理相比的成本效益,根据匹配的观察性研究结果,ACM的定义是在中心HD患者中没有ACM和血红蛋白(Hb)目标完成率低于70%。方法:采用德国法定健康保险的视角进行模拟研究。使用马尔科夫(队列)状态转移模型来预测ACM在患者剩余生命周期中的影响。所有成本均以2024欧元表示,成本和质量调整寿命年(QALYs)均以每年3%的折现率计算。为了检验结果的敏感性,进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析。结果:本研究发现,与标准护理相比,ACM提供了更多的质量指标,并产生了更低的成本。在基本情况下,ACM的净货币价值为每位患者38,423欧元。在敏感性分析中,促红细胞生成剂的年成本成为对ACM值影响最大的变量。概率敏感性分析表明,100%的成本-效果对落在东南占主导地位的象限内,表明成本-效果。结论:该模型研究表明,ACM对于治疗德国中心HD患者的贫血具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.

Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.

Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.

Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.

Background: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.

Methods: This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.

Results: This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信