Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic
{"title":"中心血液透析患者贫血管理人工智能决策支持系统的健康经济评价","authors":"Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Afschin Gandjour, Christian Apel, Dana Kendzia, Luca Neri, Francesco Bellocchio, Len Usvyat, John Larkin, Jovana Petrovic Vorkapic\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04298-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health-economic evaluation of an AI-powered decision support system for anemia management in in-center hemodialysis patients.
Background: The Anemia Control Model (ACM) is a decision support system powered by an artificial intelligence core designed to assist nephrologists in managing anemia therapy for in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ACM compared to standard of care in Germany, defined as the absence of ACM and a hemoglobin (Hb) target achievement rate of less than 70% among in-center HD patients, based on results from matched observational studies.
Methods: This simulation study adopted the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. A Markov (cohort) state-transition model was used to project the effects of the ACM over the remaining lifetime of patients. All costs were expressed in 2024 euros, and both costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. To test the sensitivity of the results, one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.
Results: This study finds that ACM provides more QALYs and incurs lower costs compared to standard of care. The net monetary value of ACM is €38,423 per patient in the base case scenario. In the sensitivity analysis, the annual cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents emerged as the variable with the largest impact on the value of ACM. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 100% of cost-effect pairs fall within the dominant southeast quadrant, indicating cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions: This modelling study demonstrates that ACM is cost-effective for managing anemia in German in-center HD patients.
期刊介绍:
BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.