通过拯救婴儿生命护理捆绑包第2版了解英国产妇护理服务用户的经验:反身性专题分析。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Holly E Reid, Debbie M Smith, Kate Widdows, Alexander Ep Heazell
{"title":"通过拯救婴儿生命护理捆绑包第2版了解英国产妇护理服务用户的经验:反身性专题分析。","authors":"Holly E Reid, Debbie M Smith, Kate Widdows, Alexander Ep Heazell","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, NHS England launched the second version of the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCBv2), recommendations that maternity providers are expected to fully implement, in an ongoing effort to reduce stillbirths and preterm births. Although stillbirth rates have seen an overall significant reduction since the inception of the SBLCB, experiences of maternity care in England are deteriorating. This study aimed to explore service users' experiences of SBLCBv2-informed maternity care to help understand the aspects of care they received positively and those needing improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study captured service users' experiences of receiving maternity care across England between November 2022 and December 2023. Purposive sampling was employed to include service users from diverse backgrounds with a variety of experiences of each element of SBLCBv2. Participants (n=29) were 16 years or older, had given birth within the previous 12 months and could comprehend and speak English. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video call and the data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes with nine subthemes were developed: (1) feelings towards measuring and monitoring, (2) the importance of clear communication, (3) healthcare professionals' roles in decision-making and (4) belief in service users, trust in healthcare professionals. Each theme is discussed in relation to the five elements, and the 'Important Principles', of SBLCBv2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings echo maternity care needs reported elsewhere in the literature, suggesting the interventions introduced in SBLCBv2 are generally acceptable but that information about SBLCBv2 must be personalised, and clearly presented, to each individual. Professionals play an important role in service users' decision-making, and participants' perceptions of how collaborative and supportive professionals were in decision-making processes varied. Believing service users and trusting professionals are of paramount importance for ensuring service users have positive maternity care experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service users' experiences of maternity care in England informed by the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2: A reflexive thematic analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Holly E Reid, Debbie M Smith, Kate Widdows, Alexander Ep Heazell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, NHS England launched the second version of the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCBv2), recommendations that maternity providers are expected to fully implement, in an ongoing effort to reduce stillbirths and preterm births. Although stillbirth rates have seen an overall significant reduction since the inception of the SBLCB, experiences of maternity care in England are deteriorating. This study aimed to explore service users' experiences of SBLCBv2-informed maternity care to help understand the aspects of care they received positively and those needing improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study captured service users' experiences of receiving maternity care across England between November 2022 and December 2023. Purposive sampling was employed to include service users from diverse backgrounds with a variety of experiences of each element of SBLCBv2. Participants (n=29) were 16 years or older, had given birth within the previous 12 months and could comprehend and speak English. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video call and the data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes with nine subthemes were developed: (1) feelings towards measuring and monitoring, (2) the importance of clear communication, (3) healthcare professionals' roles in decision-making and (4) belief in service users, trust in healthcare professionals. Each theme is discussed in relation to the five elements, and the 'Important Principles', of SBLCBv2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings echo maternity care needs reported elsewhere in the literature, suggesting the interventions introduced in SBLCBv2 are generally acceptable but that information about SBLCBv2 must be personalised, and clearly presented, to each individual. Professionals play an important role in service users' decision-making, and participants' perceptions of how collaborative and supportive professionals were in decision-making processes varied. Believing service users and trusting professionals are of paramount importance for ensuring service users have positive maternity care experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年,英国国民健康服务体系推出了第二版“拯救婴儿生命护理包”(SBLCBv2),这些建议预计产科服务提供者将全面实施,以持续努力减少死产和早产。虽然死产率已经看到了整体显著减少,因为SBLCB成立以来,经验的产妇护理在英格兰正在恶化。本研究旨在探讨服务使用者对sblcbv2知情产科护理的体验,以帮助了解他们积极接受护理的方面和需要改进的方面。方法:本定性研究捕获了服务用户在2022年11月至2023年12月期间在英格兰接受产科护理的经历。采用有目的的抽样方法,将不同背景、对SBLCBv2各要素有不同体验的服务用户纳入其中。参与者(n=29)年龄在16岁或以上,在过去12个月内分娩,能够理解和说英语。通过视频电话进行半结构化访谈,并使用反身性主题分析对数据进行分析。结果:开发了四个主题和九个副主题:(1)对测量和监测的感受;(2)明确沟通的重要性;(3)卫生保健专业人员在决策中的作用;(4)对服务使用者的信念,对卫生保健专业人员的信任。每个主题都与SBLCBv2的五要素和“重要原则”有关。结论:我们的研究结果与文献中其他地方报道的产妇护理需求相呼应,表明在SBLCBv2中引入的干预措施通常是可以接受的,但关于SBLCBv2的信息必须个性化,并清楚地呈现给每个人。专业人员在服务使用者的决策中发挥重要作用,参与者对专业人员在决策过程中如何发挥协作和支持作用的看法各不相同。信任服务使用者和信任专业人员对于确保服务使用者获得积极的产妇护理体验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Service users' experiences of maternity care in England informed by the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2: A reflexive thematic analysis.

Background: In 2019, NHS England launched the second version of the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCBv2), recommendations that maternity providers are expected to fully implement, in an ongoing effort to reduce stillbirths and preterm births. Although stillbirth rates have seen an overall significant reduction since the inception of the SBLCB, experiences of maternity care in England are deteriorating. This study aimed to explore service users' experiences of SBLCBv2-informed maternity care to help understand the aspects of care they received positively and those needing improvement.

Methods: This qualitative study captured service users' experiences of receiving maternity care across England between November 2022 and December 2023. Purposive sampling was employed to include service users from diverse backgrounds with a variety of experiences of each element of SBLCBv2. Participants (n=29) were 16 years or older, had given birth within the previous 12 months and could comprehend and speak English. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video call and the data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Four main themes with nine subthemes were developed: (1) feelings towards measuring and monitoring, (2) the importance of clear communication, (3) healthcare professionals' roles in decision-making and (4) belief in service users, trust in healthcare professionals. Each theme is discussed in relation to the five elements, and the 'Important Principles', of SBLCBv2.

Conclusions: Our findings echo maternity care needs reported elsewhere in the literature, suggesting the interventions introduced in SBLCBv2 are generally acceptable but that information about SBLCBv2 must be personalised, and clearly presented, to each individual. Professionals play an important role in service users' decision-making, and participants' perceptions of how collaborative and supportive professionals were in decision-making processes varied. Believing service users and trusting professionals are of paramount importance for ensuring service users have positive maternity care experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信