安全门诊儿科用药措施的主要合作伙伴优先事项。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonelle Prideaux, Maria T Britto, Lisa M Vaughn, Katherine A Auger, Cassandra Dodds Fetters, James M Hoffman, Julia M Kim, Kathleen E Walsh
{"title":"安全门诊儿科用药措施的主要合作伙伴优先事项。","authors":"Jonelle Prideaux, Maria T Britto, Lisa M Vaughn, Katherine A Auger, Cassandra Dodds Fetters, James M Hoffman, Julia M Kim, Kathleen E Walsh","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Paediatric medication use is at high risk for errors due to factors such as weight-based dosing and liquid medications. In the outpatient setting, where most children take their medicines, errors are common and can be dangerous. However, errors are not widely measured in this setting. Continuous measurement is the first step towards quality improvement. Our aim was to collaborate with a variety of professional and patient/family key partners to identify types of measures needed to assess paediatric outpatient medication errors, including those that occur in the home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews and concept mapping with parents, pharmacists, paediatricians, nurses, health system leaders and healthcare organisational leaders. Using concept mapping, a multiple-step structured process of surveys, sorting and analysis using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, participants generated measures and prioritised those they considered most important and feasible to measure in future medication error instruments. At the same time, interviews identified gaps in current measurement approaches and top priorities to fill these gaps. Results were compared during analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concept mapping participants (n=71) contributed ideas which key partner panel (n=9) mapped into seven clusters: prescribing errors, giving medication/administration, pharmacy dispensing, dosing tools and education, monitoring for problems, error surveillance and family partnership in understanding errors. Interview participants (n=24) highlighted the need for health system measures of safe outpatient medication used for quality improvement, including feasible measures related to home administration, dispensing errors and measures of harm. The ability to segment data by high-risk populations (eg, preferred language) was a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measures of safe administration at home were the highest priority for parents and healthcare professionals. Development of these measures is critical as no scalable measures for this element of care are available. These and other prioritised measures will likely need to include caregiver report.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key partner priorities for measures of safe outpatient paediatric medication use.\",\"authors\":\"Jonelle Prideaux, Maria T Britto, Lisa M Vaughn, Katherine A Auger, Cassandra Dodds Fetters, James M Hoffman, Julia M Kim, Kathleen E Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Paediatric medication use is at high risk for errors due to factors such as weight-based dosing and liquid medications. In the outpatient setting, where most children take their medicines, errors are common and can be dangerous. However, errors are not widely measured in this setting. Continuous measurement is the first step towards quality improvement. Our aim was to collaborate with a variety of professional and patient/family key partners to identify types of measures needed to assess paediatric outpatient medication errors, including those that occur in the home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative interviews and concept mapping with parents, pharmacists, paediatricians, nurses, health system leaders and healthcare organisational leaders. Using concept mapping, a multiple-step structured process of surveys, sorting and analysis using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, participants generated measures and prioritised those they considered most important and feasible to measure in future medication error instruments. At the same time, interviews identified gaps in current measurement approaches and top priorities to fill these gaps. Results were compared during analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concept mapping participants (n=71) contributed ideas which key partner panel (n=9) mapped into seven clusters: prescribing errors, giving medication/administration, pharmacy dispensing, dosing tools and education, monitoring for problems, error surveillance and family partnership in understanding errors. Interview participants (n=24) highlighted the need for health system measures of safe outpatient medication used for quality improvement, including feasible measures related to home administration, dispensing errors and measures of harm. The ability to segment data by high-risk populations (eg, preferred language) was a priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measures of safe administration at home were the highest priority for parents and healthcare professionals. Development of these measures is critical as no scalable measures for this element of care are available. These and other prioritised measures will likely need to include caregiver report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018799\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:由于体重给药和液体药物等因素,儿科用药存在较高的错误风险。在大多数儿童服药的门诊环境中,错误是常见的,而且可能是危险的。然而,在这种情况下,误差并没有被广泛测量。持续测量是质量改进的第一步。我们的目标是与各种专业人员和患者/家庭主要合作伙伴合作,确定评估儿科门诊用药错误所需的措施类型,包括发生在家中的用药错误。方法:我们对家长、药剂师、儿科医生、护士、卫生系统领导和卫生保健组织领导进行了定性访谈和概念映射。使用概念图,一个多步骤结构化的调查过程,使用多维尺度和分层聚类分析进行排序和分析,参与者生成测量并优先考虑他们认为最重要和可行的措施,以在未来的药物错误工具中进行测量。同时,访谈确定了当前测量方法中的差距和填补这些差距的首要任务。分析时比较结果。结果:概念图参与者(n=71)提供了想法,关键合作伙伴小组(n=9)将这些想法映射为七个类:处方错误、给药/给药、药房调剂、给药工具和教育、问题监测、错误监测和家庭合作理解错误。访谈参与者(n=24)强调需要卫生系统采取安全门诊用药措施以提高质量,包括与家庭管理、配药错误和危害措施相关的可行措施。按高危人群(如首选语言)划分数据的能力是一个优先事项。结论:家庭安全给药措施是家长和医疗保健专业人员最优先考虑的问题。制定这些措施至关重要,因为目前尚无针对这一护理要素的可扩展措施。这些和其他优先措施可能需要包括护理人员报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key partner priorities for measures of safe outpatient paediatric medication use.

Background and objectives: Paediatric medication use is at high risk for errors due to factors such as weight-based dosing and liquid medications. In the outpatient setting, where most children take their medicines, errors are common and can be dangerous. However, errors are not widely measured in this setting. Continuous measurement is the first step towards quality improvement. Our aim was to collaborate with a variety of professional and patient/family key partners to identify types of measures needed to assess paediatric outpatient medication errors, including those that occur in the home.

Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews and concept mapping with parents, pharmacists, paediatricians, nurses, health system leaders and healthcare organisational leaders. Using concept mapping, a multiple-step structured process of surveys, sorting and analysis using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, participants generated measures and prioritised those they considered most important and feasible to measure in future medication error instruments. At the same time, interviews identified gaps in current measurement approaches and top priorities to fill these gaps. Results were compared during analysis.

Results: Concept mapping participants (n=71) contributed ideas which key partner panel (n=9) mapped into seven clusters: prescribing errors, giving medication/administration, pharmacy dispensing, dosing tools and education, monitoring for problems, error surveillance and family partnership in understanding errors. Interview participants (n=24) highlighted the need for health system measures of safe outpatient medication used for quality improvement, including feasible measures related to home administration, dispensing errors and measures of harm. The ability to segment data by high-risk populations (eg, preferred language) was a priority.

Conclusions: Measures of safe administration at home were the highest priority for parents and healthcare professionals. Development of these measures is critical as no scalable measures for this element of care are available. These and other prioritised measures will likely need to include caregiver report.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信