Osman Yimer Mohammed, Kerstin Erlandsson, Tewodros Seyoum, Solomon Hailemeskel, Lemma Derseh, Helena Lindgren
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚助产士的动态分娩位置、意识和实践:一项平行混合方法研究。","authors":"Osman Yimer Mohammed, Kerstin Erlandsson, Tewodros Seyoum, Solomon Hailemeskel, Lemma Derseh, Helena Lindgren","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-08051-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respectful maternity care, as recommended by the World Health Organization, includes allowing women to give birth in the position of their choice. Dynamic birth positions, which enable women to adopt various positions during labor and delivery, are associated with improved obstetric outcomes. However, the extent of knowledge and practice regarding dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess midwives' awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions and explore their perspectives and experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed to evaluate midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dynamic birth positions. Quantitative data were analyzed using stepwise backward elimination logistic regression to identify key predictors, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 483 midwives, with 473 participating in the quantitative survey and 10 in the qualitative interviews. Fewer than half of the midwives demonstrated good levels of knowledge (45%) and attitude (49.5%), while only 22.6% reported regular practice of dynamic birth positions. Participation in training emerged as the strongest predictor of knowledge, attitude, and practice. Thematic analysis revealed six key themes: routine practices, awareness, clinical implementation, barriers, facilitators, and user needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives are notably low. Key barriers include limited awareness and suboptimal working conditions, whereas targeted training significantly enhances all assessed domains. To promote the adoption of dynamic birth positions, efforts should focus on increasing awareness, modifying delivery equipment, and improving the clinical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic birth position, awareness and practice by midwives in Ethiopia: a parallel mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Osman Yimer Mohammed, Kerstin Erlandsson, Tewodros Seyoum, Solomon Hailemeskel, Lemma Derseh, Helena Lindgren\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-08051-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respectful maternity care, as recommended by the World Health Organization, includes allowing women to give birth in the position of their choice. Dynamic birth positions, which enable women to adopt various positions during labor and delivery, are associated with improved obstetric outcomes. However, the extent of knowledge and practice regarding dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess midwives' awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions and explore their perspectives and experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed to evaluate midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dynamic birth positions. Quantitative data were analyzed using stepwise backward elimination logistic regression to identify key predictors, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 483 midwives, with 473 participating in the quantitative survey and 10 in the qualitative interviews. Fewer than half of the midwives demonstrated good levels of knowledge (45%) and attitude (49.5%), while only 22.6% reported regular practice of dynamic birth positions. Participation in training emerged as the strongest predictor of knowledge, attitude, and practice. Thematic analysis revealed six key themes: routine practices, awareness, clinical implementation, barriers, facilitators, and user needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives are notably low. Key barriers include limited awareness and suboptimal working conditions, whereas targeted training significantly enhances all assessed domains. To promote the adoption of dynamic birth positions, efforts should focus on increasing awareness, modifying delivery equipment, and improving the clinical environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08051-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08051-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dynamic birth position, awareness and practice by midwives in Ethiopia: a parallel mixed-methods study.
Background: Respectful maternity care, as recommended by the World Health Organization, includes allowing women to give birth in the position of their choice. Dynamic birth positions, which enable women to adopt various positions during labor and delivery, are associated with improved obstetric outcomes. However, the extent of knowledge and practice regarding dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives remains poorly understood.
Objective: To assess midwives' awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions and explore their perspectives and experiences.
Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed to evaluate midwives' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dynamic birth positions. Quantitative data were analyzed using stepwise backward elimination logistic regression to identify key predictors, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis.
Results: The study included 483 midwives, with 473 participating in the quantitative survey and 10 in the qualitative interviews. Fewer than half of the midwives demonstrated good levels of knowledge (45%) and attitude (49.5%), while only 22.6% reported regular practice of dynamic birth positions. Participation in training emerged as the strongest predictor of knowledge, attitude, and practice. Thematic analysis revealed six key themes: routine practices, awareness, clinical implementation, barriers, facilitators, and user needs.
Conclusion: Awareness and practice of dynamic birth positions among Ethiopian midwives are notably low. Key barriers include limited awareness and suboptimal working conditions, whereas targeted training significantly enhances all assessed domains. To promote the adoption of dynamic birth positions, efforts should focus on increasing awareness, modifying delivery equipment, and improving the clinical environment.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.