历史控制数据动态借用的非参数贝叶斯方法。

IF 1.7 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Biometrics Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf118
Tomohiro Ohigashi, Kazushi Maruo, Takashi Sozu, Masahiko Gosho
{"title":"历史控制数据动态借用的非参数贝叶斯方法。","authors":"Tomohiro Ohigashi, Kazushi Maruo, Takashi Sozu, Masahiko Gosho","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujaf118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When incorporating historical control data into the analysis of current randomized controlled trial data, it is critical to account for differences between the datasets. When the cause of difference is an unmeasured factor and adjustment for only observed covariates is insufficient, it is desirable to use a dynamic borrowing method that reduces the impact of heterogeneous historical controls. We propose a nonparametric Bayesian approach that addresses between-trial heterogeneity and allows borrowing historical controls homogeneous with the current control. Additionally, to emphasize conflict resolution between historical controls and the current control, we introduce a method based on the dependent Dirichlet process (DP) mixture. The proposed methods can be implemented using the same procedure, regardless of whether the outcome data comprise aggregated study-level data or individual participant data. We also develop a novel index of similarity between the historical and current control data, based on the posterior distribution of the parameter of interest. We conduct a simulation study and analyze clinical trial examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods compared to existing methods. The proposed method, based on the dependent DP mixture, can accurately borrow from homogeneous historical controls while reducing the impact of heterogeneous historical controls compared to the typical DP mixture. The proposed methods outperform existing methods in scenarios with heterogeneous historical controls, in which the meta-analytic approach is ineffective.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonparametric Bayesian approach for dynamic borrowing of historical control data.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Ohigashi, Kazushi Maruo, Takashi Sozu, Masahiko Gosho\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomtc/ujaf118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When incorporating historical control data into the analysis of current randomized controlled trial data, it is critical to account for differences between the datasets. When the cause of difference is an unmeasured factor and adjustment for only observed covariates is insufficient, it is desirable to use a dynamic borrowing method that reduces the impact of heterogeneous historical controls. We propose a nonparametric Bayesian approach that addresses between-trial heterogeneity and allows borrowing historical controls homogeneous with the current control. Additionally, to emphasize conflict resolution between historical controls and the current control, we introduce a method based on the dependent Dirichlet process (DP) mixture. The proposed methods can be implemented using the same procedure, regardless of whether the outcome data comprise aggregated study-level data or individual participant data. We also develop a novel index of similarity between the historical and current control data, based on the posterior distribution of the parameter of interest. We conduct a simulation study and analyze clinical trial examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods compared to existing methods. The proposed method, based on the dependent DP mixture, can accurately borrow from homogeneous historical controls while reducing the impact of heterogeneous historical controls compared to the typical DP mixture. The proposed methods outperform existing methods in scenarios with heterogeneous historical controls, in which the meta-analytic approach is ineffective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrics\",\"volume\":\"81 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujaf118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujaf118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当将历史对照数据纳入当前随机对照试验数据分析时,考虑数据集之间的差异是至关重要的。当差异的原因是一个无法测量的因素,并且仅对观察到的协变量进行调整是不够的,需要使用动态借用方法来减少异质历史控制的影响。我们提出了一种非参数贝叶斯方法,该方法解决了试验之间的异质性,并允许借用与当前控制相同的历史控制。此外,为了强调历史控制和当前控制之间的冲突解决,我们引入了一种基于相关狄利克雷过程(DP)混合的方法。无论结果数据是包括总体研究水平数据还是个体参与者数据,所建议的方法都可以使用相同的程序来实施。我们还基于感兴趣参数的后验分布,开发了一种新的历史和当前控制数据之间的相似性指数。我们进行了模拟研究并分析了临床试验实例,以评估所提出的方法与现有方法的性能。该方法基于依赖的DP混合,与典型的DP混合相比,可以准确地借鉴同质历史控制,同时减少异质历史控制的影响。在具有异构历史控制的情况下,所提出的方法优于现有方法,在这种情况下,元分析方法是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonparametric Bayesian approach for dynamic borrowing of historical control data.

When incorporating historical control data into the analysis of current randomized controlled trial data, it is critical to account for differences between the datasets. When the cause of difference is an unmeasured factor and adjustment for only observed covariates is insufficient, it is desirable to use a dynamic borrowing method that reduces the impact of heterogeneous historical controls. We propose a nonparametric Bayesian approach that addresses between-trial heterogeneity and allows borrowing historical controls homogeneous with the current control. Additionally, to emphasize conflict resolution between historical controls and the current control, we introduce a method based on the dependent Dirichlet process (DP) mixture. The proposed methods can be implemented using the same procedure, regardless of whether the outcome data comprise aggregated study-level data or individual participant data. We also develop a novel index of similarity between the historical and current control data, based on the posterior distribution of the parameter of interest. We conduct a simulation study and analyze clinical trial examples to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods compared to existing methods. The proposed method, based on the dependent DP mixture, can accurately borrow from homogeneous historical controls while reducing the impact of heterogeneous historical controls compared to the typical DP mixture. The proposed methods outperform existing methods in scenarios with heterogeneous historical controls, in which the meta-analytic approach is ineffective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信