胞嘧啶碱基编辑器dna结合域融合编辑窗口调制在RNP格式。

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Erin Brettmann, Fuqiang Chen, Stephen Beishir, Graeme Garvey
{"title":"胞嘧啶碱基编辑器dna结合域融合编辑窗口调制在RNP格式。","authors":"Erin Brettmann, Fuqiang Chen, Stephen Beishir, Graeme Garvey","doi":"10.1186/s12896-025-01020-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Base editing technologies allow for the precise and efficient installation of defined nucleotide substitutions into a target genome without the introduction of double strand breaks or DNA templates. Here we describe two recombinant, protein format cytosine base editors (CBEs) that efficiently catalyze the installation of cytosine-to-thymine edits, termed \"Flexible\" and \"Precision.\" Flexible exhibits a wide editing window, while Precision uses a fused single-stranded DNA binding protein to narrow the editing window, lowering the risk of editing multiple cytosine residues at the target site. We show that co-transfection with uracil glycosylase inhibitor protein increases the proportion of substitutions that are C-to-T and the ratio of C-to-T editing to indel formation, thus reducing undesired editing outcomes. We use in vitro editing assays to characterize our editors and show a preference for cytosine residues preceded by thymine (TpC dinucleotides) and unmethylated cytosine residues.</p>","PeriodicalId":8905,"journal":{"name":"BMC Biotechnology","volume":"25 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytosine base editor-DNA binding domain fusions for editing window modulation in the RNP format.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Brettmann, Fuqiang Chen, Stephen Beishir, Graeme Garvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12896-025-01020-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Base editing technologies allow for the precise and efficient installation of defined nucleotide substitutions into a target genome without the introduction of double strand breaks or DNA templates. Here we describe two recombinant, protein format cytosine base editors (CBEs) that efficiently catalyze the installation of cytosine-to-thymine edits, termed \\\"Flexible\\\" and \\\"Precision.\\\" Flexible exhibits a wide editing window, while Precision uses a fused single-stranded DNA binding protein to narrow the editing window, lowering the risk of editing multiple cytosine residues at the target site. We show that co-transfection with uracil glycosylase inhibitor protein increases the proportion of substitutions that are C-to-T and the ratio of C-to-T editing to indel formation, thus reducing undesired editing outcomes. We use in vitro editing assays to characterize our editors and show a preference for cytosine residues preceded by thymine (TpC dinucleotides) and unmethylated cytosine residues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-01020-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-01020-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碱基编辑技术允许在不引入双链断裂或DNA模板的情况下,将定义的核苷酸替换精确有效地安装到目标基因组中。在这里,我们描述了两种重组蛋白形式的胞嘧啶碱基编辑器(CBEs),它们有效地催化了胞嘧啶到胸腺嘧啶编辑的安装,称为“灵活”和“精确”。Flexible展示了一个宽的编辑窗口,而Precision使用融合的单链DNA结合蛋白来缩小编辑窗口,降低了在目标位点编辑多个胞嘧啶残基的风险。我们发现,尿嘧啶糖基酶抑制剂蛋白的共转染增加了C-to-T取代的比例,以及C-to-T编辑与indel形成的比例,从而减少了不想要的编辑结果。我们使用体外编辑实验来表征我们的编辑器,并显示出对胸腺嘧啶(TpC二核苷酸)和未甲基化的胞嘧啶残基的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cytosine base editor-DNA binding domain fusions for editing window modulation in the RNP format.

Cytosine base editor-DNA binding domain fusions for editing window modulation in the RNP format.

Cytosine base editor-DNA binding domain fusions for editing window modulation in the RNP format.

Cytosine base editor-DNA binding domain fusions for editing window modulation in the RNP format.

Base editing technologies allow for the precise and efficient installation of defined nucleotide substitutions into a target genome without the introduction of double strand breaks or DNA templates. Here we describe two recombinant, protein format cytosine base editors (CBEs) that efficiently catalyze the installation of cytosine-to-thymine edits, termed "Flexible" and "Precision." Flexible exhibits a wide editing window, while Precision uses a fused single-stranded DNA binding protein to narrow the editing window, lowering the risk of editing multiple cytosine residues at the target site. We show that co-transfection with uracil glycosylase inhibitor protein increases the proportion of substitutions that are C-to-T and the ratio of C-to-T editing to indel formation, thus reducing undesired editing outcomes. We use in vitro editing assays to characterize our editors and show a preference for cytosine residues preceded by thymine (TpC dinucleotides) and unmethylated cytosine residues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Biotechnology
BMC Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BMC Biotechnology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the manipulation of biological macromolecules or organisms for use in experimental procedures, cellular and tissue engineering or in the pharmaceutical, agricultural biotechnology and allied industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信