Nergiz Erkut, Merve Kestane, Selim Demir, Ahmet Mentese, Ozlen Balta, Mehmet Sonmez
{"title":"Perk和ATF6信号通路在慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者未折叠蛋白反应中的作用","authors":"Nergiz Erkut, Merve Kestane, Selim Demir, Ahmet Mentese, Ozlen Balta, Mehmet Sonmez","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2025.2553628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PERK, ATF6, and IRE1α signalling pathways are unfolded protein response (UPR) signalling pathways. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways, which are UPR signalling pathways, in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ELISA was performed on peripheral blood plasma samples from CLL patients and the control group for the markers eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6, CHOP, HIF-1α and caspase 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the levels of eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6 and CHOP were higher in the CLL group than in the control group (p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, respectively). While no difference was observed between the CLL group and the control group in terms of HIF-1α level, caspase 3 level was higher in the CLL group (p = <0.001). There was a positive relationship between the level of HIF-1α and the levels of ATF6 and CHOP (r = 0.648, p = <0.001; r = 0.727, p = <0.001, respectively). Also, a positive correlation was observed between caspase 3 level and ATF6 level (r = 0.301, p = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, markers associated with PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways were higher in CLL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involvement of Perk and ATF6 Signal Pathways in Indicating Unfolded Protein Response in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"Nergiz Erkut, Merve Kestane, Selim Demir, Ahmet Mentese, Ozlen Balta, Mehmet Sonmez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1354750X.2025.2553628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PERK, ATF6, and IRE1α signalling pathways are unfolded protein response (UPR) signalling pathways. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways, which are UPR signalling pathways, in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ELISA was performed on peripheral blood plasma samples from CLL patients and the control group for the markers eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6, CHOP, HIF-1α and caspase 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the levels of eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6 and CHOP were higher in the CLL group than in the control group (p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, respectively). While no difference was observed between the CLL group and the control group in terms of HIF-1α level, caspase 3 level was higher in the CLL group (p = <0.001). There was a positive relationship between the level of HIF-1α and the levels of ATF6 and CHOP (r = 0.648, p = <0.001; r = 0.727, p = <0.001, respectively). Also, a positive correlation was observed between caspase 3 level and ATF6 level (r = 0.301, p = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, markers associated with PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways were higher in CLL patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2025.2553628\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2025.2553628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Involvement of Perk and ATF6 Signal Pathways in Indicating Unfolded Protein Response in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia.
Introduction: PERK, ATF6, and IRE1α signalling pathways are unfolded protein response (UPR) signalling pathways. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways, which are UPR signalling pathways, in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients.
Methods: ELISA was performed on peripheral blood plasma samples from CLL patients and the control group for the markers eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6, CHOP, HIF-1α and caspase 3.
Results: In this study, the levels of eIF2AK3, GRP78, ATF6 and CHOP were higher in the CLL group than in the control group (p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, p = <0.001, respectively). While no difference was observed between the CLL group and the control group in terms of HIF-1α level, caspase 3 level was higher in the CLL group (p = <0.001). There was a positive relationship between the level of HIF-1α and the levels of ATF6 and CHOP (r = 0.648, p = <0.001; r = 0.727, p = <0.001, respectively). Also, a positive correlation was observed between caspase 3 level and ATF6 level (r = 0.301, p = 0.030).
Discussion: In this study, markers associated with PERK and ATF6 signalling pathways were higher in CLL patients.
期刊介绍:
The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source.
Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged:
• Biomarkers of disease
• Biomarkers of exposure
• Biomarkers of response
• Biomarkers of susceptibility
Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.