体外生命支持的儿科危重血液学肿瘤学转诊途径:标准化评估和转移可以提高生存率。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hitesh S Sandhu, Kimberly Fan, Samir Shah, Xiaomeng Yuan, Laurel Metzler, Jennifer McArthur, Dai Kimura, Melissa Hines, Caitlin Hurley, Akshay Sharma, Katy Rower, Haitao Pan, Jeffery Brown, R Ray Morrison, Saad Ghafoor
{"title":"体外生命支持的儿科危重血液学肿瘤学转诊途径:标准化评估和转移可以提高生存率。","authors":"Hitesh S Sandhu, Kimberly Fan, Samir Shah, Xiaomeng Yuan, Laurel Metzler, Jennifer McArthur, Dai Kimura, Melissa Hines, Caitlin Hurley, Akshay Sharma, Katy Rower, Haitao Pan, Jeffery Brown, R Ray Morrison, Saad Ghafoor","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant has increased, with steadily improving outcomes. To standardize our approach to early evaluation and identification of ECLS candidates, we developed the Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support (CHORPE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transferred between two pediatric hospitals for ECLS evaluation. Forty-six patients were transferred for ECLS evaluation: 17 pre-CHORPE, 28 post-CHORPE implementation, and 1 index patient between January 2010 and December 2021. Six were placed on ECLS in the preprocess group; three survived decannulation, but none survived to hospital discharge. In the post-process group, nine were placed on ECLS, with six surviving to decannulation and transfer back to the referring hospital (odds ratios [OR] = 24, p = 0.01) and five surviving to hospital discharge (OR = 15.9, p = 0.03). In the post-process group, there were fewer complications during transfer (p = 0.0228), and clinical improvement was the reason for not going on ECLS (p = 0.0120). A standardized approach to ECLS candidacy evaluation, early identification, and safe transfer with continuity of care is associated with improved survival after ECLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support: Standardized Evaluation and Transfer Can Improve Survival.\",\"authors\":\"Hitesh S Sandhu, Kimberly Fan, Samir Shah, Xiaomeng Yuan, Laurel Metzler, Jennifer McArthur, Dai Kimura, Melissa Hines, Caitlin Hurley, Akshay Sharma, Katy Rower, Haitao Pan, Jeffery Brown, R Ray Morrison, Saad Ghafoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the last decade, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant has increased, with steadily improving outcomes. To standardize our approach to early evaluation and identification of ECLS candidates, we developed the Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support (CHORPE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transferred between two pediatric hospitals for ECLS evaluation. Forty-six patients were transferred for ECLS evaluation: 17 pre-CHORPE, 28 post-CHORPE implementation, and 1 index patient between January 2010 and December 2021. Six were placed on ECLS in the preprocess group; three survived decannulation, but none survived to hospital discharge. In the post-process group, nine were placed on ECLS, with six surviving to decannulation and transfer back to the referring hospital (odds ratios [OR] = 24, p = 0.01) and five surviving to hospital discharge (OR = 15.9, p = 0.03). In the post-process group, there were fewer complications during transfer (p = 0.0228), and clinical improvement was the reason for not going on ECLS (p = 0.0120). A standardized approach to ECLS candidacy evaluation, early identification, and safe transfer with continuity of care is associated with improved survival after ECLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,体外生命支持(ECLS)用于血液学或肿瘤学诊断或接受造血细胞移植的患者有所增加,结果稳步改善。为了规范我们早期评估和识别ECLS候选患者的方法,我们制定了体外生命支持关键血液肿瘤学转诊途径(CHORPE)。我们对在两家儿科医院转院进行ECLS评估的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。在2010年1月至2021年12月期间,46例患者转移进行ECLS评估:17例术前手术,28例术后手术,1例指数患者。预处理组6例接受ECLS治疗;其中3人成功摘除导管,但没有一人活到出院。在后处理组,9例患者接受ECLS治疗,其中6例存活至拔管并转回转诊医院(优势比[OR] = 24, p = 0.01), 5例存活至出院(OR = 15.9, p = 0.03)。术后组转移过程中并发症较少(p = 0.0228),临床改善是不进行ECLS的原因(p = 0.0120)。ECLS候选性评估、早期识别和安全转移的标准化方法与ECLS后生存率的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support: Standardized Evaluation and Transfer Can Improve Survival.

Over the last decade, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) use for patients with a hematologic or oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant has increased, with steadily improving outcomes. To standardize our approach to early evaluation and identification of ECLS candidates, we developed the Critical Hematology Oncology Referral Pathway for Extracorporeal Life Support (CHORPE). We performed a retrospective chart review of patients transferred between two pediatric hospitals for ECLS evaluation. Forty-six patients were transferred for ECLS evaluation: 17 pre-CHORPE, 28 post-CHORPE implementation, and 1 index patient between January 2010 and December 2021. Six were placed on ECLS in the preprocess group; three survived decannulation, but none survived to hospital discharge. In the post-process group, nine were placed on ECLS, with six surviving to decannulation and transfer back to the referring hospital (odds ratios [OR] = 24, p = 0.01) and five surviving to hospital discharge (OR = 15.9, p = 0.03). In the post-process group, there were fewer complications during transfer (p = 0.0228), and clinical improvement was the reason for not going on ECLS (p = 0.0120). A standardized approach to ECLS candidacy evaluation, early identification, and safe transfer with continuity of care is associated with improved survival after ECLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信