{"title":"肿瘤康复在澳大利亚:全国调查更新。","authors":"Ally Lasscock, Nicholas F Taylor, Amy M Dennett","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs were available across Australia in 2015. Clinical guidelines have since recommended that exercise be included in standard cancer care. This study aimed to (1) identify and describe exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia, (2) determine whether there have been changes in the number or content of programs since 2015, and (3) describe factors associated with program implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey collected data from program coordinators of Australian oncology rehabilitation programs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using independent t-tests and chi-squared tests. Qualitative data underwent content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia increased from 31 programs in 2015 to 76 programs in 2024, equating to an 88% increase from 8 to 15 programs per 100,000 cancer survivors. Sixty-two completed surveys were returned (62/76, 82% response rate). Programs were typically for people with any cancer at any stage of treatment. The proportion of programs offering education decreased by 29% since 2015 [χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 6.011, p = 0.014]. On average, programs ran three times per week (standard deviation [SD] 4) for 11 weeks (SD 10). There was increased use of exercise testing in 2024. Program implementation was supported by an increasing presentation of cancer survivors in general rehabilitation programs (30/62, 48%) and challenged by a lack of funding (27/62, 44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia have more than doubled in the past decade, but availability remains poor. Programs were mainly exercise-only, with an increased use of objective criteria for exercise dosage and progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncology Rehabilitation in Australia: A National Survey Update.\",\"authors\":\"Ally Lasscock, Nicholas F Taylor, Amy M Dennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs were available across Australia in 2015. Clinical guidelines have since recommended that exercise be included in standard cancer care. This study aimed to (1) identify and describe exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia, (2) determine whether there have been changes in the number or content of programs since 2015, and (3) describe factors associated with program implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey collected data from program coordinators of Australian oncology rehabilitation programs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using independent t-tests and chi-squared tests. Qualitative data underwent content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia increased from 31 programs in 2015 to 76 programs in 2024, equating to an 88% increase from 8 to 15 programs per 100,000 cancer survivors. Sixty-two completed surveys were returned (62/76, 82% response rate). Programs were typically for people with any cancer at any stage of treatment. The proportion of programs offering education decreased by 29% since 2015 [χ<sup>2</sup>(1) = 6.011, p = 0.014]. On average, programs ran three times per week (standard deviation [SD] 4) for 11 weeks (SD 10). There was increased use of exercise testing in 2024. Program implementation was supported by an increasing presentation of cancer survivors in general rehabilitation programs (30/62, 48%) and challenged by a lack of funding (27/62, 44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia have more than doubled in the past decade, but availability remains poor. Programs were mainly exercise-only, with an increased use of objective criteria for exercise dosage and progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oncology Rehabilitation in Australia: A National Survey Update.
Introduction: Few exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs were available across Australia in 2015. Clinical guidelines have since recommended that exercise be included in standard cancer care. This study aimed to (1) identify and describe exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia, (2) determine whether there have been changes in the number or content of programs since 2015, and (3) describe factors associated with program implementation.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey collected data from program coordinators of Australian oncology rehabilitation programs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using independent t-tests and chi-squared tests. Qualitative data underwent content analysis.
Results: The number of oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia increased from 31 programs in 2015 to 76 programs in 2024, equating to an 88% increase from 8 to 15 programs per 100,000 cancer survivors. Sixty-two completed surveys were returned (62/76, 82% response rate). Programs were typically for people with any cancer at any stage of treatment. The proportion of programs offering education decreased by 29% since 2015 [χ2(1) = 6.011, p = 0.014]. On average, programs ran three times per week (standard deviation [SD] 4) for 11 weeks (SD 10). There was increased use of exercise testing in 2024. Program implementation was supported by an increasing presentation of cancer survivors in general rehabilitation programs (30/62, 48%) and challenged by a lack of funding (27/62, 44%).
Conclusion: Oncology rehabilitation programs in Australia have more than doubled in the past decade, but availability remains poor. Programs were mainly exercise-only, with an increased use of objective criteria for exercise dosage and progression.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.