Jake T W Williams, Mbathio Dieng, Katy Bell, Scott McAlister, Rachael L Morton
{"title":"III期黑色素瘤监测成像的医疗费用和碳排放。","authors":"Jake T W Williams, Mbathio Dieng, Katy Bell, Scott McAlister, Rachael L Morton","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00998-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the health system cost and carbon emissions of diagnostic imaging tests undertaken by patients on different surveillance schedules for follow-up of stage III melanoma. We also aimed to demonstrate how different monetary valuations of carbon emissions affect overall cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative data from the Melanoma Institute Australia's Melanoma Research Database for patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma between 2000 and 2014 and followed them until 2023. Imaging tests (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET], PET-CT, ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) undertaken during follow-up were described. Healthcare costs were estimated per patient-year using data from the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Carbon emissions from tests and transport were estimated per patient-year using life cycle assessment and valued using New South Wales carbon values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 553 patients were included in this study: 115 in the 3-6-monthly surveillance imaging group, 273 in the 12-monthly surveillance imaging group, and 165 in the no routine imaging surveillance group. Healthcare costs and carbon emissions were highest in the 3-6-monthly group (Australian dollar [AUD] $1098 and 226 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions [CO<sub>2</sub>-e] per patient-year) followed by the 12-monthly imaging group (AUD $767 and 150 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e per patient-year), and the no routine imaging group (AUD $319 and 50 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e per patient-year). When carbon emissions were valued in Australian dollars they accounted for 1.8-2.6% of total costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More frequent surveillance imaging of patients with stage III melanoma is associated with higher healthcare costs and environmental impacts, the latter of which are responsible for a small proportion of total costs when valued in dollars.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Costs and Carbon Emissions of Stage III Melanoma Surveillance Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Jake T W Williams, Mbathio Dieng, Katy Bell, Scott McAlister, Rachael L Morton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-025-00998-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the health system cost and carbon emissions of diagnostic imaging tests undertaken by patients on different surveillance schedules for follow-up of stage III melanoma. We also aimed to demonstrate how different monetary valuations of carbon emissions affect overall cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative data from the Melanoma Institute Australia's Melanoma Research Database for patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma between 2000 and 2014 and followed them until 2023. Imaging tests (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET], PET-CT, ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) undertaken during follow-up were described. Healthcare costs were estimated per patient-year using data from the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Carbon emissions from tests and transport were estimated per patient-year using life cycle assessment and valued using New South Wales carbon values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 553 patients were included in this study: 115 in the 3-6-monthly surveillance imaging group, 273 in the 12-monthly surveillance imaging group, and 165 in the no routine imaging surveillance group. Healthcare costs and carbon emissions were highest in the 3-6-monthly group (Australian dollar [AUD] $1098 and 226 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions [CO<sub>2</sub>-e] per patient-year) followed by the 12-monthly imaging group (AUD $767 and 150 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e per patient-year), and the no routine imaging group (AUD $319 and 50 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-e per patient-year). When carbon emissions were valued in Australian dollars they accounted for 1.8-2.6% of total costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More frequent surveillance imaging of patients with stage III melanoma is associated with higher healthcare costs and environmental impacts, the latter of which are responsible for a small proportion of total costs when valued in dollars.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00998-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00998-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare Costs and Carbon Emissions of Stage III Melanoma Surveillance Imaging.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the health system cost and carbon emissions of diagnostic imaging tests undertaken by patients on different surveillance schedules for follow-up of stage III melanoma. We also aimed to demonstrate how different monetary valuations of carbon emissions affect overall cost.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of administrative data from the Melanoma Institute Australia's Melanoma Research Database for patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma between 2000 and 2014 and followed them until 2023. Imaging tests (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET], PET-CT, ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) undertaken during follow-up were described. Healthcare costs were estimated per patient-year using data from the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Carbon emissions from tests and transport were estimated per patient-year using life cycle assessment and valued using New South Wales carbon values.
Results: Overall, 553 patients were included in this study: 115 in the 3-6-monthly surveillance imaging group, 273 in the 12-monthly surveillance imaging group, and 165 in the no routine imaging surveillance group. Healthcare costs and carbon emissions were highest in the 3-6-monthly group (Australian dollar [AUD] $1098 and 226 kg carbon dioxide equivalent emissions [CO2-e] per patient-year) followed by the 12-monthly imaging group (AUD $767 and 150 kg CO2-e per patient-year), and the no routine imaging group (AUD $319 and 50 kg CO2-e per patient-year). When carbon emissions were valued in Australian dollars they accounted for 1.8-2.6% of total costs.
Conclusions: More frequent surveillance imaging of patients with stage III melanoma is associated with higher healthcare costs and environmental impacts, the latter of which are responsible for a small proportion of total costs when valued in dollars.
期刊介绍:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy.
While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.