基于模型的双翼放射成像数据跟踪的合成计算机断层扫描的准确性和可靠性。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Seth J Kussow, Jared L Zitnay, Penny R Atkins, Andrew E Anderson
{"title":"基于模型的双翼放射成像数据跟踪的合成计算机断层扫描的准确性和可靠性。","authors":"Seth J Kussow, Jared L Zitnay, Penny R Atkins, Andrew E Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03831-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Biplane videoradiography (BVR) accurately measures hip kinematics in vivo. One downside of BVR is that it typically requires a pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan to reconstruct surfaces for model-based tracking (MBT), increasing the radiation burden to participants. Synthetic CT (sCT) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides similar volumetric image-based data. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect sCT has on the accuracy and reliability of in vivo hip kinematics from BVR data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three asymptomatic participants received CT and MRI scans and were imaged with BVR while standing and during gait. Kinematics were calculated from femur and pelvis surfaces reconstructed from CT and sCT scans. Accuracy and inter-/intra-reviewer reliability of hip kinematics using sCT were assessed against CT as the reference using mean absolute error (MAE), mean difference (MD), precision, and inter-/intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Kinematics were represented with and without correction for standing posture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAE, MD, and precision of posture-corrected sCT kinematic results were 0.85, 0.60, and 0.71° for rotations and 0.40, 0.23, and 0.39 mm for translations, respectively. Accuracy of posture-corrected joint angles was within 0.17° of prior MBT validation in the hip, while translation accuracy and precision were greater herein. Kinematic results using CT and sCT had similar reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study establish novel reliability metrics for in vivo hip kinematics from BVR. Findings indicate that sCT can be used in lieu of CT to measure in vivo hip kinematics, reducing radiation burden of BVR hip kinematic protocols by up to 73%.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Reliability of Synthetic Computed Tomography for Model-Based Tracking of Biplane Videoradiography Data.\",\"authors\":\"Seth J Kussow, Jared L Zitnay, Penny R Atkins, Andrew E Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03831-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Biplane videoradiography (BVR) accurately measures hip kinematics in vivo. One downside of BVR is that it typically requires a pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan to reconstruct surfaces for model-based tracking (MBT), increasing the radiation burden to participants. Synthetic CT (sCT) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides similar volumetric image-based data. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect sCT has on the accuracy and reliability of in vivo hip kinematics from BVR data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three asymptomatic participants received CT and MRI scans and were imaged with BVR while standing and during gait. Kinematics were calculated from femur and pelvis surfaces reconstructed from CT and sCT scans. Accuracy and inter-/intra-reviewer reliability of hip kinematics using sCT were assessed against CT as the reference using mean absolute error (MAE), mean difference (MD), precision, and inter-/intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Kinematics were represented with and without correction for standing posture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAE, MD, and precision of posture-corrected sCT kinematic results were 0.85, 0.60, and 0.71° for rotations and 0.40, 0.23, and 0.39 mm for translations, respectively. Accuracy of posture-corrected joint angles was within 0.17° of prior MBT validation in the hip, while translation accuracy and precision were greater herein. Kinematic results using CT and sCT had similar reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study establish novel reliability metrics for in vivo hip kinematics from BVR. Findings indicate that sCT can be used in lieu of CT to measure in vivo hip kinematics, reducing radiation burden of BVR hip kinematic protocols by up to 73%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03831-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03831-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双平面放射成像(BVR)精确测量体内髋关节运动学。BVR的一个缺点是,它通常需要骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)来重建基于模型的跟踪(MBT)的表面,增加了参与者的辐射负担。磁共振成像(MRI)合成CT (sCT)提供了类似的基于体积图像的数据。本研究的目的是评估sCT对基于BVR数据的体内髋关节运动学的准确性和可靠性的影响。方法:三名无症状的参与者接受CT和MRI扫描,并在站立和步态时进行BVR成像。从CT和sCT扫描重建的股骨和骨盆表面计算运动学。使用sCT评估髋关节运动学的准确性和评价者之间/内部的可靠性,以CT作为参考,使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均差(MD)、精度和类间/类内相关系数(icc)进行评估。运动学表示有和没有校正的站立姿势。结果:姿态校正后的sCT运动学结果的MAE、MD和精度分别为0.85、0.60和0.71°旋转和0.40、0.23和0.39 mm平移。姿态矫正关节角度的精度与先前髋关节MBT验证相比在0.17°以内,而此处的平移精度和精度更高。CT和sCT的运动学结果具有相似的可靠性。结论:本研究的结果为BVR的体内髋关节运动学建立了新的可靠性指标。研究结果表明,sCT可以代替CT来测量体内髋关节运动学,减少BVR髋关节运动学方案的辐射负担高达73%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy and Reliability of Synthetic Computed Tomography for Model-Based Tracking of Biplane Videoradiography Data.

Purpose: Biplane videoradiography (BVR) accurately measures hip kinematics in vivo. One downside of BVR is that it typically requires a pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan to reconstruct surfaces for model-based tracking (MBT), increasing the radiation burden to participants. Synthetic CT (sCT) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides similar volumetric image-based data. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect sCT has on the accuracy and reliability of in vivo hip kinematics from BVR data.

Methods: Three asymptomatic participants received CT and MRI scans and were imaged with BVR while standing and during gait. Kinematics were calculated from femur and pelvis surfaces reconstructed from CT and sCT scans. Accuracy and inter-/intra-reviewer reliability of hip kinematics using sCT were assessed against CT as the reference using mean absolute error (MAE), mean difference (MD), precision, and inter-/intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Kinematics were represented with and without correction for standing posture.

Results: MAE, MD, and precision of posture-corrected sCT kinematic results were 0.85, 0.60, and 0.71° for rotations and 0.40, 0.23, and 0.39 mm for translations, respectively. Accuracy of posture-corrected joint angles was within 0.17° of prior MBT validation in the hip, while translation accuracy and precision were greater herein. Kinematic results using CT and sCT had similar reliability.

Conclusion: The results of this study establish novel reliability metrics for in vivo hip kinematics from BVR. Findings indicate that sCT can be used in lieu of CT to measure in vivo hip kinematics, reducing radiation burden of BVR hip kinematic protocols by up to 73%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信