多室剂量法反复经动脉放射栓塞的安全性。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Cigdem Soydal, Burak Demir, Mine Araz, Irem Mesci, Emre Can Çelebioğlu, Nuriye Ozlem Kucuk
{"title":"多室剂量法反复经动脉放射栓塞的安全性。","authors":"Cigdem Soydal, Burak Demir, Mine Araz, Irem Mesci, Emre Can Çelebioğlu, Nuriye Ozlem Kucuk","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02094-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the local treatment options for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, our knowledge regarding the safety of repeated TARE remains limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of repeated transarterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed the data of the patients who were treated with at least two separate sessions of radioembolization with <sup>90</sup>Y microspheres. Multi-compartment and voxel-wise dosimetry was performed for every treatment session and cumulative whole-liver normal tissue absorbed radiation dose (D<sub>norm</sub>), V20-V100 values for whole-liver normal tissue were calculated. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading system for alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/bilirubin levels and International Normalized Ratio (INR) before and after each treatment. In addition, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores, grades, and changes in ALBI score (ΔALBI) were recorded. Difference between the ALBI scores before and after the treatment was compared with Wilcoxon tests, and relationships between ΔALBI and dosimetric variables were compared using linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (6 males, 18 females; median age: 57 years) were included in the analysis. The most common diagnosis was colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (46%). Seventeen patients (71%) underwent two TARE treatments, five (21%) underwent three, and two (8%) underwent four. The median interval between the first and second treatments was 138 days (range: 34-782), and between the second and third treatments was 210 days (range: 72-435). No CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. ALBI score analysis revealed no significant changes after the first two treatments, but a significant difference was noted after the third treatment (P = 0.043), with one patient progressing to ALBI Grade 3 with significant hypoalbuminemia. No significant relationship was found between ΔALBI and treatment intervals. ALT/AST elevations were mostly transient and mild, with only one case of Grade 2 hepatotoxicity in each of the first two treatments. In patients treated with glass microspheres in their first two treatments (n = 12), a significant linear correlation was found between cumulative D<sub>norm</sub> and ΔALBI (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.512, P = 0.007). Cumulative dose-volume histogram parameters, particularly V30, V40, and V50, showed significant correlations with ΔALBI. However, in patients treated with resin microspheres (n = 6), no statistically significant relationship was observed between cumulative D<sub>norm</sub> and ΔALBI (P = 0.718).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeated TARE with a multi-compartment personalized dosimetric approach appears to be safe for the first two cycles, with limited low-grade toxicity. However, significant increase in ALBI scores after the third treatment was observed. ALBI score changes after second TARE were associated with cumulative liver radiation exposure in patients treated with glass microspheres. Larger studies are needed to further explore predictors of hepatotoxicity in repeated TARE.</p>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of repeated trans-arterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.\",\"authors\":\"Cigdem Soydal, Burak Demir, Mine Araz, Irem Mesci, Emre Can Çelebioğlu, Nuriye Ozlem Kucuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12149-025-02094-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the local treatment options for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, our knowledge regarding the safety of repeated TARE remains limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of repeated transarterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed the data of the patients who were treated with at least two separate sessions of radioembolization with <sup>90</sup>Y microspheres. Multi-compartment and voxel-wise dosimetry was performed for every treatment session and cumulative whole-liver normal tissue absorbed radiation dose (D<sub>norm</sub>), V20-V100 values for whole-liver normal tissue were calculated. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading system for alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/bilirubin levels and International Normalized Ratio (INR) before and after each treatment. In addition, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores, grades, and changes in ALBI score (ΔALBI) were recorded. Difference between the ALBI scores before and after the treatment was compared with Wilcoxon tests, and relationships between ΔALBI and dosimetric variables were compared using linear regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (6 males, 18 females; median age: 57 years) were included in the analysis. The most common diagnosis was colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (46%). Seventeen patients (71%) underwent two TARE treatments, five (21%) underwent three, and two (8%) underwent four. The median interval between the first and second treatments was 138 days (range: 34-782), and between the second and third treatments was 210 days (range: 72-435). No CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. ALBI score analysis revealed no significant changes after the first two treatments, but a significant difference was noted after the third treatment (P = 0.043), with one patient progressing to ALBI Grade 3 with significant hypoalbuminemia. No significant relationship was found between ΔALBI and treatment intervals. ALT/AST elevations were mostly transient and mild, with only one case of Grade 2 hepatotoxicity in each of the first two treatments. In patients treated with glass microspheres in their first two treatments (n = 12), a significant linear correlation was found between cumulative D<sub>norm</sub> and ΔALBI (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.512, P = 0.007). Cumulative dose-volume histogram parameters, particularly V30, V40, and V50, showed significant correlations with ΔALBI. However, in patients treated with resin microspheres (n = 6), no statistically significant relationship was observed between cumulative D<sub>norm</sub> and ΔALBI (P = 0.718).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeated TARE with a multi-compartment personalized dosimetric approach appears to be safe for the first two cycles, with limited low-grade toxicity. However, significant increase in ALBI scores after the third treatment was observed. ALBI score changes after second TARE were associated with cumulative liver radiation exposure in patients treated with glass microspheres. Larger studies are needed to further explore predictors of hepatotoxicity in repeated TARE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02094-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-025-02094-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)是原发性和转移性肝肿瘤的局部治疗选择之一。然而,我们对重复TARE安全性的了解仍然有限。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估多室剂量法反复经动脉放射栓塞的安全性。方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了至少两次使用90Y微球进行放射栓塞治疗的患者的数据。每个疗程进行多室和体素剂量测定,计算全肝正常组织累积吸收辐射剂量(Dnorm), V20-V100值。采用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)评分系统对每次治疗前后丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)/天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)/胆红素水平和国际标准化比率(INR)进行毒性评估。此外,记录白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分、分级和ALBI评分的变化(ΔALBI)。采用Wilcoxon检验比较治疗前后ALBI评分的差异,并采用线性回归分析比较ΔALBI与剂量学变量之间的关系。结果:共纳入24例患者,其中男性6例,女性18例,中位年龄57岁。最常见的诊断是大肠癌肝转移(46%)。17例患者(71%)接受了2次TARE治疗,5例(21%)接受了3次TARE治疗,2例(8%)接受了4次TARE治疗。第一次和第二次治疗之间的中位间隔为138天(范围:34-782),第二次和第三次治疗之间的中位间隔为210天(范围:72-435)。未见CTCAE 3级或4级毒性反应。ALBI评分分析显示,前两次治疗后无显著变化,但第三次治疗后差异显著(P = 0.043), 1例患者进展为ALBI 3级,伴有明显的低白蛋白血症。ΔALBI与治疗间隔无显著关系。ALT/AST升高大多是短暂的和轻微的,在前两种治疗中各只有1例2级肝毒性。在前两次使用玻璃微球治疗的患者中(n = 12),累积Dnorm与ΔALBI之间存在显著的线性相关(R2 = 0.512, P = 0.007)。累积剂量-体积直方图参数,特别是V30、V40和V50,与ΔALBI有显著相关性。然而,在使用树脂微球治疗的患者中(n = 6),累积Dnorm与ΔALBI之间无统计学意义的关系(P = 0.718)。结论:重复TARE与多室个体化剂量学方法在前两个周期似乎是安全的,具有有限的低级别毒性。然而,观察到第三次治疗后ALBI评分显著增加。在接受玻璃微球治疗的患者中,第二次TARE后的ALBI评分变化与累积肝脏辐射暴露有关。需要更大规模的研究来进一步探索重复TARE的肝毒性预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of repeated trans-arterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.

Purpose: Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the local treatment options for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, our knowledge regarding the safety of repeated TARE remains limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of repeated transarterial radioembolization with multi-compartment dosimetry.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed the data of the patients who were treated with at least two separate sessions of radioembolization with 90Y microspheres. Multi-compartment and voxel-wise dosimetry was performed for every treatment session and cumulative whole-liver normal tissue absorbed radiation dose (Dnorm), V20-V100 values for whole-liver normal tissue were calculated. Toxicity was assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading system for alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/bilirubin levels and International Normalized Ratio (INR) before and after each treatment. In addition, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores, grades, and changes in ALBI score (ΔALBI) were recorded. Difference between the ALBI scores before and after the treatment was compared with Wilcoxon tests, and relationships between ΔALBI and dosimetric variables were compared using linear regression analyses.

Results: A total of 24 patients (6 males, 18 females; median age: 57 years) were included in the analysis. The most common diagnosis was colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (46%). Seventeen patients (71%) underwent two TARE treatments, five (21%) underwent three, and two (8%) underwent four. The median interval between the first and second treatments was 138 days (range: 34-782), and between the second and third treatments was 210 days (range: 72-435). No CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. ALBI score analysis revealed no significant changes after the first two treatments, but a significant difference was noted after the third treatment (P = 0.043), with one patient progressing to ALBI Grade 3 with significant hypoalbuminemia. No significant relationship was found between ΔALBI and treatment intervals. ALT/AST elevations were mostly transient and mild, with only one case of Grade 2 hepatotoxicity in each of the first two treatments. In patients treated with glass microspheres in their first two treatments (n = 12), a significant linear correlation was found between cumulative Dnorm and ΔALBI (R2 = 0.512, P = 0.007). Cumulative dose-volume histogram parameters, particularly V30, V40, and V50, showed significant correlations with ΔALBI. However, in patients treated with resin microspheres (n = 6), no statistically significant relationship was observed between cumulative Dnorm and ΔALBI (P = 0.718).

Conclusion: Repeated TARE with a multi-compartment personalized dosimetric approach appears to be safe for the first two cycles, with limited low-grade toxicity. However, significant increase in ALBI scores after the third treatment was observed. ALBI score changes after second TARE were associated with cumulative liver radiation exposure in patients treated with glass microspheres. Larger studies are needed to further explore predictors of hepatotoxicity in repeated TARE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信