间充质干细胞治疗膝关节软骨缺损:系统综述。

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2025-08-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202520241426
Eduardo B DE Sousa, Renata Akemi M Matsui, Leonardo C Boldrini, Leandra S Baptista, José Mauro Granjeiro
{"title":"间充质干细胞治疗膝关节软骨缺损:系统综述。","authors":"Eduardo B DE Sousa, Renata Akemi M Matsui, Leonardo C Boldrini, Leandra S Baptista, José Mauro Granjeiro","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202520241426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no consensus on the ideal type, dose, expansion, and differentiation of MSCs for treating knee cartilage defects. Our goal was to perform an overview of systematic reviews regarding the use of MSCs for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. The overview of systematic reviews followed the Population (patients aged between 18 and 50 years with traumatic knee articular cartilage lesions), Intervention (MSCs treatment), Comparison (autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture), and Outcomes (magnetic resonance imaging or second-look knee arthroscopy) matrix. No language restrictions were applied. We assessed methodological quality, reporting standards, and evidence levels. A total of 529 records were retrieved from six databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included, and three were updated with recent data. Most reviews suggested a positive effect of MSCs on cartilage regeneration; however, considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding MSC source, preparation methods, and outcome measures. MSCs show promise in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Nonetheless, due to methodological differences and limited high-quality evidence, no standardized clinical protocol can yet be recommended. Further research is needed to establish consensus and guide clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"97 3","pages":"e20241426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee: an overview of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo B DE Sousa, Renata Akemi M Matsui, Leonardo C Boldrini, Leandra S Baptista, José Mauro Granjeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0001-3765202520241426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is no consensus on the ideal type, dose, expansion, and differentiation of MSCs for treating knee cartilage defects. Our goal was to perform an overview of systematic reviews regarding the use of MSCs for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. The overview of systematic reviews followed the Population (patients aged between 18 and 50 years with traumatic knee articular cartilage lesions), Intervention (MSCs treatment), Comparison (autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture), and Outcomes (magnetic resonance imaging or second-look knee arthroscopy) matrix. No language restrictions were applied. We assessed methodological quality, reporting standards, and evidence levels. A total of 529 records were retrieved from six databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included, and three were updated with recent data. Most reviews suggested a positive effect of MSCs on cartilage regeneration; however, considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding MSC source, preparation methods, and outcome measures. MSCs show promise in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Nonetheless, due to methodological differences and limited high-quality evidence, no standardized clinical protocol can yet be recommended. Further research is needed to establish consensus and guide clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias\",\"volume\":\"97 3\",\"pages\":\"e20241426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520241426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520241426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于治疗膝关节软骨缺损的MSCs的理想类型、剂量、扩展和分化尚无共识。我们的目的是对MSCs治疗膝关节关节软骨病变的系统回顾进行概述。系统综述遵循人群(年龄在18至50岁之间的创伤性膝关节软骨病变患者),干预(MSCs治疗),比较(自体软骨细胞植入或微骨折)和结果(磁共振成像或二次膝关节镜检查)矩阵。没有语言限制。我们评估了方法学质量、报告标准和证据水平。从6个数据库中共检索到529条记录。在重复删除和资格筛选后,纳入了9项系统评价,其中3项更新了最近的数据。大多数综述认为间充质干细胞对软骨再生有积极作用;然而,在MSC来源、制备方法和结果测量方面观察到相当大的异质性。骨髓间充质干细胞在治疗膝关节软骨缺损方面显示出良好的前景。然而,由于方法学的差异和有限的高质量证据,尚不能推荐标准化的临床方案。需要进一步的研究来建立共识和指导临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee: an overview of systematic reviews.

There is no consensus on the ideal type, dose, expansion, and differentiation of MSCs for treating knee cartilage defects. Our goal was to perform an overview of systematic reviews regarding the use of MSCs for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. The overview of systematic reviews followed the Population (patients aged between 18 and 50 years with traumatic knee articular cartilage lesions), Intervention (MSCs treatment), Comparison (autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture), and Outcomes (magnetic resonance imaging or second-look knee arthroscopy) matrix. No language restrictions were applied. We assessed methodological quality, reporting standards, and evidence levels. A total of 529 records were retrieved from six databases. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included, and three were updated with recent data. Most reviews suggested a positive effect of MSCs on cartilage regeneration; however, considerable heterogeneity was observed regarding MSC source, preparation methods, and outcome measures. MSCs show promise in the treatment of knee cartilage defects. Nonetheless, due to methodological differences and limited high-quality evidence, no standardized clinical protocol can yet be recommended. Further research is needed to establish consensus and guide clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信