Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew
{"title":"台湾与美国PM&R住院医师培训:台湾大学附属医院与弗吉尼亚联邦大学之比较。","authors":"Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"944-949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Training in Taiwan and the United States: A Comparison Between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University.\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Training in Taiwan and the United States: A Comparison Between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University.
Abstract: In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).