台湾与美国PM&R住院医师培训:台湾大学附属医院与弗吉尼亚联邦大学之比较。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew
{"title":"台湾与美国PM&R住院医师培训:台湾大学附属医院与弗吉尼亚联邦大学之比较。","authors":"Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"944-949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Training in Taiwan and the United States: A Comparison Between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University.\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Ping Chen, William Carter, Huey-Wen Liang, David X Cifu, Henry L Lew\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"944-949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:为了应对日益增长的需求,物理医学和康复(PM&R)住院医师项目在美国和台湾继续显著扩大。虽然台湾的PM&R方法最初是模仿美国的系统,但由于不同的医疗系统和文化背景,已经形成了实质性的差异。本文以国立台湾大学附属医院(NTUH)与美国维吉尼亚联邦大学(VCU)为例,比较两国具有代表性的PM&R住院医师培训项目的异同。两个程序的核心组成部分进行了检查和比较。在亚专业培训、团队协作模式、文化影响和报销制度方面的关键差异进行了详细探讨。这些比较为程序开发提供了可行的见解。美国的项目可能会考虑加强肌肉骨骼超声培训,并在住院和门诊轮转期间规定所需的亚专科暴露,而台湾可能会探索实施结构化的亚专科奖学金。尽管存在差异,但这两个系统都致力于全面的体育教育和跨学科的团队合作。北大与VCU之间的学术交流丰富了住院医师的经验,并有望促进持久的国际合作,为PM&R的持续临床和学术进步做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Training in Taiwan and the United States: A Comparison Between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University.

Abstract: In response to the growing need, physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs have continued to expand significantly in both the United States and Taiwan. While Taiwan's physical medicine and rehabilitation approach was initially modeled after the US system, substantial differences have evolved, shaped by distinct medical systems and cultural contexts. This article compares similarities and differences between representative physical medicine and rehabilitation residency training programs in Taiwan and the US, using National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University as examples. The core components of both programs are examined and compared. Key differences in subspecialty training, team collaboration models, cultural influences, and reimbursement systems are explored in detail. These comparisons offer actionable insights for program development. US programs may consider enhancing musculoskeletal ultrasound training and specifying required subspecialty exposures during inpatient and outpatient rotations, while Taiwan may explore implementing structured subspecialty fellowships. Despite the differences, both systems share a commitment to comprehensive physiatric education and interdisciplinary teamwork. Scholarly exchange between National Taiwan University Hospital and Virginia Commonwealth University has enriched residents' experiences and is expected to foster lasting international collaborations that contribute to the continued clinical and academic advancement of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信