极低强度阻力运动对青年男性主动脉-肱动脉血压差异的影响。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Kaname Tagawa, Junichiro Hashimoto
{"title":"极低强度阻力运动对青年男性主动脉-肱动脉血压差异的影响。","authors":"Kaname Tagawa, Junichiro Hashimoto","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistance exercise is accompanied by pronounced elevations in pulse pressure during and following exercise. Whether an increase in aortic pulse pressure during resistance exercise is mitigated by a reduction in exercise intensity remains uncertain. We examined the effects of resistance exercise at 10% and 40% one-repetition maximum on aortic pulse pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen participants performed resistance exercise to exhaustion at 10% and 40% of one-repetition maximum, along with a sham control, on separate days in a randomized controlled crossover design. Brachial pressure waveforms were recorded using the SphygmoCor XCEL device to estimate the aortic pulse pressure, forward and backward pressure amplitudes, and augmentation index both prior to resistance exercise or equivalent seated rest and at 3-min post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in aortic pulse pressure following resistance exercise was smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum compared to 40% one-repetition maximum (p = 0.02), whereas the rise in brachial pulse pressure did not differ between these intensities. The increases in backward pressure amplitude and augmentation index were smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum (both, p<0.05), while forward pressure amplitude remained consistent across intensities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight disparities in post-exercise pulse pressure responses between the aortic and brachial arteries, which can be attributed to differences in backward pressure amplitude. The beneficial effects of 10% one-repetition maximum resistance exercise became evident when assessing aortic pressure waveforms. To attenuate excessive increases in aortic pulsatile pressure stress during and after resistance exercise, 10% one-repetition maximum may serve as a relatively low-risk intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of very low-intensity resistance exercise on aortic-brachial blood pressure disparity in young men.\",\"authors\":\"Kaname Tagawa, Junichiro Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajh/hpaf172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistance exercise is accompanied by pronounced elevations in pulse pressure during and following exercise. Whether an increase in aortic pulse pressure during resistance exercise is mitigated by a reduction in exercise intensity remains uncertain. We examined the effects of resistance exercise at 10% and 40% one-repetition maximum on aortic pulse pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen participants performed resistance exercise to exhaustion at 10% and 40% of one-repetition maximum, along with a sham control, on separate days in a randomized controlled crossover design. Brachial pressure waveforms were recorded using the SphygmoCor XCEL device to estimate the aortic pulse pressure, forward and backward pressure amplitudes, and augmentation index both prior to resistance exercise or equivalent seated rest and at 3-min post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An increase in aortic pulse pressure following resistance exercise was smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum compared to 40% one-repetition maximum (p = 0.02), whereas the rise in brachial pulse pressure did not differ between these intensities. The increases in backward pressure amplitude and augmentation index were smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum (both, p<0.05), while forward pressure amplitude remained consistent across intensities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight disparities in post-exercise pulse pressure responses between the aortic and brachial arteries, which can be attributed to differences in backward pressure amplitude. The beneficial effects of 10% one-repetition maximum resistance exercise became evident when assessing aortic pressure waveforms. To attenuate excessive increases in aortic pulsatile pressure stress during and after resistance exercise, 10% one-repetition maximum may serve as a relatively low-risk intensity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阻力运动伴随着运动期间和运动后脉压的明显升高。抗阻运动中主动脉脉压升高是否会因运动强度的降低而减轻尚不确定。我们研究了10%和40%的阻力运动对主动脉脉压的影响。方法:在随机对照交叉设计中,16名参与者分别在10%和40%的单次重复极限下进行抗阻运动,并进行假对照。使用sphygmomoor XCEL设备记录肱动脉压力波形,以估计阻力运动或等效坐位休息前和干预后3分钟的主动脉脉压、前向和后向压力振幅和增强指数。结果:阻力运动后主动脉脉压的增加在10%的最大单次重复时比40%的最大单次重复时更小(p = 0.02),而臂脉压的上升在这些强度之间没有差异。结论:这些发现突出了运动后主动脉和肱动脉脉压反应的差异,这可归因于反压幅值的差异。当评估主动脉压力波形时,10%的单次最大阻力运动的有益效果变得明显。为了减轻阻力运动期间和之后主动脉搏动压力应力的过度增加,10%的单次重复最大值可以作为相对较低的风险强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of very low-intensity resistance exercise on aortic-brachial blood pressure disparity in young men.

Background: Resistance exercise is accompanied by pronounced elevations in pulse pressure during and following exercise. Whether an increase in aortic pulse pressure during resistance exercise is mitigated by a reduction in exercise intensity remains uncertain. We examined the effects of resistance exercise at 10% and 40% one-repetition maximum on aortic pulse pressure.

Methods: Sixteen participants performed resistance exercise to exhaustion at 10% and 40% of one-repetition maximum, along with a sham control, on separate days in a randomized controlled crossover design. Brachial pressure waveforms were recorded using the SphygmoCor XCEL device to estimate the aortic pulse pressure, forward and backward pressure amplitudes, and augmentation index both prior to resistance exercise or equivalent seated rest and at 3-min post-intervention.

Results: An increase in aortic pulse pressure following resistance exercise was smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum compared to 40% one-repetition maximum (p = 0.02), whereas the rise in brachial pulse pressure did not differ between these intensities. The increases in backward pressure amplitude and augmentation index were smaller at 10% one-repetition maximum (both, p<0.05), while forward pressure amplitude remained consistent across intensities.

Conclusion: These findings highlight disparities in post-exercise pulse pressure responses between the aortic and brachial arteries, which can be attributed to differences in backward pressure amplitude. The beneficial effects of 10% one-repetition maximum resistance exercise became evident when assessing aortic pressure waveforms. To attenuate excessive increases in aortic pulsatile pressure stress during and after resistance exercise, 10% one-repetition maximum may serve as a relatively low-risk intensity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信